Skip to main content
Log in

Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question if ant behaviour and biological limitations should be considered before generalisations about the ant’s defensive capabilities in ant–plant relationships was explored through a new experimental manipulation. In the Brazilian tropical savanna, we tested the protective action of Cephalotes pusillus Klug on the extrafloral nectar-bearing plant Ouratea spectabilis Engl. (Ochnaceae). Three treatments were performed: control (free ant access), Cephalotes-treatment (access permitted only to C. pusillus), and ant free treatment (no ants). No difference was found in the levels of leaf herbivory among experimental stems. Visitation by different ant species to control stems translated into significantly greater fruit and seed production by this stem category than by ant-free and Cephalotes-treated stems. Thus, results showed that an investigation of system’s natural history, ant’s morphological traits, defensive capabilities and behaviour are needed before a protective role is inferred to each associated ant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley BL (1977) Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:407–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (1998) The contribution of ant plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL, Alarcon R, Geber M (2006) The evolution of plants–insect mutualisms. New Phytol 172:412–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K (2004) Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest an mosaic. Oikos 06:344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corn ML (1980) Polymorphism and polyethism in the neotropical ant Cephalotes atratus (L.). Insect Soc 27(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, MCkey D (1993) The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant–plant relationships. J Hymenopt Res 2:13–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR, Chua TH (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Gibernau M, Durand JL (2000) Pioner plant protection against herbivory: impact of different ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on a proliferation of the variegated locust. Sociobiology 36:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K (2004) Multitrophic relationships, conditional mutualisms, and the study of interaction biodiversity in tropical savannas. Neotrop Entomol 33:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Marullo R, Mound LA (1997) New Brazilian species of Heterothrips (Insecta; Thysanoptera). Interacting with ants in Peixotoa tomentosa flowers (Malpighiaceae). J Nat Hist 31:1307–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (1996) Honeydew flicking by treehoppers provides cues to potential tending ants. Anim Behav 51:1071–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (1999) Ant-homoptera interactions in neotropical savanna: the honeydewproducing treehopper Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae) and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 31:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2000) Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific effects. oecologia 124:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Berto V, Réu W (1996) Herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit-set in an extrafloral nectary plant Qualea multiflora (Vochysiaceae) in cerrado vegetation. j trop ecol 12:887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Torezan-Silingardi H (2009) Insect-plant intractions: new pathways to a better comprehension of ecological communities in Neotropical savannas. neotrop entomol 38:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R, Dominguez CA (1995) Plant-herbivore interactions in Mesoamerican tropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Medina E, Mooney HA (eds) Seasonal tropical dry forests. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AM, Axe’n AH, Pierce NE (2001) Assessing the quality of different ant species as partners of a myrmecophilous butterfly. oecologia 129:452–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard Univ Press

  • Inouye DW, Taylor OR (1979) A temperate region plant–ant–seed predator system: consequences of extrafloral nectar secretion by Helianthella quinquenervis. ecology 60:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito F, Higashi S (1991) Variance of ant effects on the different life forms of moth caterpillars. j anim ecol 60:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (2005) Nectar as fuel for plant protectors. In: Wäckers FL, van-Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 75–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korndörfer AP, Del-Claro K (2006) Ant defense versus induced defense in Lafoensia pacari (Lythraceae), a myrmecophilous tree of the Brazilian cerrado. biotropica 38(6):786–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TEX (2007) Does having multiple partners weaken the benefits of facultative mutualism? A test with cacti and cactus-tending ants. oikos 116:500–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothershead K, Marquis RJ (2000) Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant–pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. ecology 81:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody K, Linsenmair KE (2004) Plant-attracted ants affect arthropod community structure but not necessarily herbivory. ecol entomol 29:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH (2006) A mutualism’s indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. oikos 113:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd DJ, Catchpole EA (1983) Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichryum spp.–ant interactions. oecologia 59:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Del-Claro K (2005) Multitrophic interactions in a Neotropical savanna: ant–hemipteran systems, associated insect herbivores, and a host plant. In: Burslem DFRP, Pinard, MA, Hartley SE (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 414–438

  • Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (2002) The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and natural history of a tropical Savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Sears ALW, Huxel GR, Strong DR, Maron J (2000) When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? trends ecol evol 15:473–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Diniz IR, Morais HC, Marques ESA (1995) The abundance of insect herbivore species in the tropics: high local richness of rare species. biotropica 27:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Réu WF, Del-Claro K (2005) Natural history and biology of Chlamisus minax Lacordaire (Chrysomelidae: Chlamisinae). neotrop entomol 34:357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FS, Barbosa NP, Diniz I, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T (2009) Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. oecologia 160:537–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. amer nat 174:134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (2003) Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. Am Nat 162:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillberg CV (2004) Friend or foe? A behavioral and stable isotopic investigation of an ant-plant symbiosis. oecologia 140:506–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank V. Stefani, J.R. Trigo, N. Blüthgen, and one anonymous referee for valuable comments on the text. Our laboratory thanks Clube de Caça e Pesca Itororó de Uberlândia for permiting the use of its cerrado. J. Byk thanks Capes–Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior for financial support. K. Del-Claro thanks Conselho Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia (CNPq) (research grant) and also Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (Fapemig) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kleber Del-Claro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byk, J., Del-Claro, K. Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. acta ethol 13, 33–38 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8

Keywords

Navigation