Skip to main content
Log in

Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp. — ant interactions

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Characterstics of Australian endemic Helichrysum bracteratum and H. viscosum suggest that foraging ants act as “guards” of developing flowerheads, protecting capitula from seed predators: (1) extrafloral nectar is secreted from leaves subtending the capitula and from bracts encircling the floral disc during pre- to post-flowering periods; (2) capitula are attended by ants; and, (3) encounters between ants and other capitula visitors, including predispersal seed predators such as Tephritis sp. (Diptera), can be frequent. In experiments to test the ant-guard hypothesis, exclusion of ants from plants increased abundance of other insects on the developing capitula. The difference between ant-access and ant-exclusion treatments was related to ant abundance on the access plants. These effects were statistically significant in spite of the large variation in insect activity between sites and through the season.

The increased abundance of insects on capitula following ant-exclusion did not, however, result in significant increases in the number of adult seed predators observed on capitula, the number of immature seed predators in capitula, or capitula damage as estimated between ant-access and exclusion treatments of either H. bracteatum or H. viscosum. Further, the ant-exclusion treatment on H. bracteatum had no significant influence on pollination as measured by seed set or on the degree of parasitism of Tephritis sp. by Megastigmus sp. Site and season most strongly affected numbers of immature seed predators and damage to capitula.

We discuss these findings in relation to the ant-guard hypothesis and suggest that generalization of the protection hypothesis to all plants with extrafloral nectaries is premature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker HG, Baker I (1977) Intraspecific constancy of floral nectar amino acids. Bot Gaz 138:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ, Nelder JA (1978) The GLIM System 3 Relcase Manual. Oxford, Numerical Algorithms Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley B (1977) Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 8:407–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Colless DH, McAlpine DK (1970) Diptera. In C.S.I.R.O. The Insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press. Victoria. pp 656–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA (1978) Bee visits and the nectar of Echium vulgare L. and Sinapis alba L. Ecol Ent 3:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin F (1877) On the glandular bodies of Acacia sphaerocephala and Cecropia peltata as food for ants, with an appendix on the nectar-glands of the common brake fern, Pteris aquilina. Bot J Linn Soc (Lond) 15:398–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpino F (1986) Funzione mirmecofila nel regno vegetale. Memorie della R. Academia delle Scienze dell Istituto di Bologna, Serie Quarto Tomo VII:pp 215–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and square root. Ann Math Stat 21:607–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey-Wyssling A (1955) The phloem supply to nectaries. Acta Bot Neer 4:358–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW, Taylor OR (1979) A temperature plant-ant-seed predator system: consequences of extrafloral nectar secretion by Helianthella quinquenervis. Ecology 54:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1969) Seed-eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler KH (1978) Insects feeding at extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Ent News 89:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehat M, Wyndham M (1972) The influence of temperature on development, longevity, and fecundity in the Rutherglen bug, Nysius vinitor (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Aust J Zool 20:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1983) Flowering phenology and floral biology of Inga (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Syst Bot, in press

  • Maxwell FG, Schuster MF, Meredity WR, Laster ML (1976) Influence of the nectariless character in cotton on harmful and beneficial insects. In Jermey T (ed) The Host-Plant in Relation to Insect Behavior and Reproduction. Symp Bio Hung 16:157–161

  • Morley B (1978) Helichrysum bracteatum and allies. J Roy Hort Soc 103:489–491

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Dowd DJ (1979) Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia (Berlin) 43:233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1980) The evolutionary significance of extrafloral nectar production by Costus woodsonii (Zingiberaceae): an experimental analysis of ant protection. J Ecol 68:959–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuel RW (1954) Nectar secretion in relation to nitrogen supply, nutritional status, and growth of the plant. Can J Agric Sci 35:124–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Uxkull-Guldenbrandt von, Nieuwenhuis M (1907) Extraflorale Zuckerausscheidungen und Ameisenschutz Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 21:195–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein RR von (1889) Über die Composition der österreichisch-ungarischen Flora mit zuckerabscheidenden Hüllschuppen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte. Abteilung I. Mineralogie, Krystallographie, Botanik 97:570–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler WM (1910) Ants, their Structure, Development and Behavior. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Dowd, D.J., Catchpole, E.A. Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp. — ant interactions. Oecologia 59, 191–200 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378837

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378837

Keywords

Navigation