Summary
Characterstics of Australian endemic Helichrysum bracteratum and H. viscosum suggest that foraging ants act as “guards” of developing flowerheads, protecting capitula from seed predators: (1) extrafloral nectar is secreted from leaves subtending the capitula and from bracts encircling the floral disc during pre- to post-flowering periods; (2) capitula are attended by ants; and, (3) encounters between ants and other capitula visitors, including predispersal seed predators such as Tephritis sp. (Diptera), can be frequent. In experiments to test the ant-guard hypothesis, exclusion of ants from plants increased abundance of other insects on the developing capitula. The difference between ant-access and ant-exclusion treatments was related to ant abundance on the access plants. These effects were statistically significant in spite of the large variation in insect activity between sites and through the season.
The increased abundance of insects on capitula following ant-exclusion did not, however, result in significant increases in the number of adult seed predators observed on capitula, the number of immature seed predators in capitula, or capitula damage as estimated between ant-access and exclusion treatments of either H. bracteatum or H. viscosum. Further, the ant-exclusion treatment on H. bracteatum had no significant influence on pollination as measured by seed set or on the degree of parasitism of Tephritis sp. by Megastigmus sp. Site and season most strongly affected numbers of immature seed predators and damage to capitula.
We discuss these findings in relation to the ant-guard hypothesis and suggest that generalization of the protection hypothesis to all plants with extrafloral nectaries is premature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker HG, Baker I (1977) Intraspecific constancy of floral nectar amino acids. Bot Gaz 138:183–191
Baker RJ, Nelder JA (1978) The GLIM System 3 Relcase Manual. Oxford, Numerical Algorithms Group
Bentley B (1977) Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 8:407–427
Colless DH, McAlpine DK (1970) Diptera. In C.S.I.R.O. The Insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press. Victoria. pp 656–674
Corbet SA (1978) Bee visits and the nectar of Echium vulgare L. and Sinapis alba L. Ecol Ent 3:25–38
Darwin F (1877) On the glandular bodies of Acacia sphaerocephala and Cecropia peltata as food for ants, with an appendix on the nectar-glands of the common brake fern, Pteris aquilina. Bot J Linn Soc (Lond) 15:398–408
Delpino F (1986) Funzione mirmecofila nel regno vegetale. Memorie della R. Academia delle Scienze dell Istituto di Bologna, Serie Quarto Tomo VII:pp 215–323
Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and square root. Ann Math Stat 21:607–611
Frey-Wyssling A (1955) The phloem supply to nectaries. Acta Bot Neer 4:358–369
Inouye DW, Taylor OR (1979) A temperature plant-ant-seed predator system: consequences of extrafloral nectar secretion by Helianthella quinquenervis. Ecology 54:1–8
Janzen DH (1969) Seed-eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23:1–27
Keeler KH (1978) Insects feeding at extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Ent News 89:163–168
Kehat M, Wyndham M (1972) The influence of temperature on development, longevity, and fecundity in the Rutherglen bug, Nysius vinitor (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Aust J Zool 20:67–78
Koptur S (1983) Flowering phenology and floral biology of Inga (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Syst Bot, in press
Maxwell FG, Schuster MF, Meredity WR, Laster ML (1976) Influence of the nectariless character in cotton on harmful and beneficial insects. In Jermey T (ed) The Host-Plant in Relation to Insect Behavior and Reproduction. Symp Bio Hung 16:157–161
Morley B (1978) Helichrysum bracteatum and allies. J Roy Hort Soc 103:489–491
O'Dowd DJ (1979) Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia (Berlin) 43:233–248
Schemske DW (1980) The evolutionary significance of extrafloral nectar production by Costus woodsonii (Zingiberaceae): an experimental analysis of ant protection. J Ecol 68:959–967
Shuel RW (1954) Nectar secretion in relation to nitrogen supply, nutritional status, and growth of the plant. Can J Agric Sci 35:124–138
Uxkull-Guldenbrandt von, Nieuwenhuis M (1907) Extraflorale Zuckerausscheidungen und Ameisenschutz Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 21:195–327
Wettstein RR von (1889) Über die Composition der österreichisch-ungarischen Flora mit zuckerabscheidenden Hüllschuppen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte. Abteilung I. Mineralogie, Krystallographie, Botanik 97:570–589
Wheeler WM (1910) Ants, their Structure, Development and Behavior. Columbia University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Dowd, D.J., Catchpole, E.A. Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp. — ant interactions. Oecologia 59, 191–200 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378837
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378837