Skip to main content
Log in

Aggressiveness during monogamous pairing in the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa: a test of the mate guarding hypothesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Australian sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa, maintains monogamous associations for an average of 6 weeks before mating each spring. One hypothesis to explain this prolonged partnership is that males are guarding their female partners from rival males. This hypothesis has three predictions, that males are more aggressive than females to conspecific males, that male aggression will increase as the time of mating gets closer, and that males will be more aggressive towards conspecific males when they are with their partner than when they are alone. We tested those predictions with indirect evidence of aggression, using counts of scale damage on randomly encountered lizards, and with direct observations of their responses to approaches by conspecific and heterospecific models. As predicted by the mate guarding hypothesis, males showed more evidence of aggression towards conspecifics than did females. However, in contrast to the hypothesis, males did not become more aggressive as the time of mating came closer, and males in pairs were less aggressive than males on their own. Mate guarding cannot be the only process that has led to the prolonged monogamous associations in this species. Parental care is also unknown in these lizards, and we suggest that monogamy may be maintained through some form of female coercion, allowing females to gain additional fitness from the enhanced vigilance that results from male proximity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson DP (2002) Low extra-pair paternity in the white-tailed ptarmigan. Condor 104:192–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JM (1996) Introduction: pair bonds and partnerships. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University, Oxford, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist D, Kempenaers B, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK (2002) Genetic parentage and mate guarding in the arctic breeding western sandpiper. Auk 119:228–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotherton PNM, Manser MB (1997) Female dispersion and the evolution of monogamy in the dik-dik. Anim Behav 54:1413–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (1988) Mate fidelity in an Australian lizard Trachydosaurus rugosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (1990) Comparisons of displaced and retained partners in a monogamous lizard. Aust Wildl Res 17:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (1994) Population dynamics and pair fidelity in sleepy lizards. In: Vitt LJ, Pianka ER (eds) Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University, Princeton, pp 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (1995) Population ecology of the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa, at Mt. Mary, South Australia. Aust J Ecol 20:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (2000) Monogamy in lizards. Behav Process 51:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Baghurst BC (1998) Home range overlap between mothers and their offspring in the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Burzacott D (2001) Temporal and spatial dynamics of a parapatric boundary between two Australian reptile ticks. Mol Ecol 10:639–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Burzacott D (2002) Changes in climate and in the time of pairing of the Australian lizard, Tiliqua rugosa: a 15 year study. J Zool 256:383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Lindle C (2002) Following trails of partners in the monogamous lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Acta Ethol 5:25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Pamula Y (1996) Sexually dimorphic head sizes and reproductive success in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. J Zool 240:511–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Pamula Y (1998) Enhanced vigilance in monogamous pairs of the lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol 9:452–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, McNally A, Dubas G (1991) Asynchronous seasonal activity in male and female sleepy lizards, Tiliqua rugosa. J Herpetol 25:436–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Bedford GS, Schulz BA (1993a) How do sleepy lizards find each other? Herpetologica 49:294–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Pamula Y, Schulze L (1993b) Parturition in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. J Herpetol 27:489–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Cooper SJB, Baghurst BC (1998) Social monogamy and extra-pair fertilization in an Australian lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter CC, Murphy JB (1978) Tongue display by the common bluetongue (Tiliqua scincoides) (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Scincidae). J Herpetol 12:428–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Catry P, Furness RW (1997) Territorial intrusions and copulation behaviour in the great skua, Catharacta skua. Anim Behav 54:1265–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Censky EJ (1995) Mating strategy and reproductive success in the teiid lizard, Ameiva plei. Behaviour 132:529–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Censky EJ (1997) Female mate choice in the non-territorial lizard Ameiva plei (Teiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang-Dobbs HC, Webster MS, Holmes RT (2001) The effectiveness of mate guarding by male black-throated blue warblers. Behav Ecol 12:541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1997) Maximizing male reproductive success in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): preliminary evidence for mate guarding, size-assortative pairing, and opportunistic extra-pair mating. Amphibia–Reptilia 18:59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton E (2000) Female mate guarding: no evidence in a socially monogamous species. Anim Behav 59:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado M (2001) Mate guarding and social mating system in male common chameleons (Chamaeleo chamaeleon). J Zool 255:425–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes-Gromadzki TZ (2002) Trophic trickles rather than cascades: conditional top-down and bottom-up dynamics in an Australian chenopod shrubland. Aust Ecol 27:490–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL, Leonard ML (1996) Mate attendance and copulatory behaviour in western bluebirds: evidence of mate guarding. Anim Behav 52:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson J, Haydock H, Koenig W, Stanback M, Pitelka F (1995) Genetic monogamy in single-male groups of acorn woodpeckers, Melanerpes formicovorus. Mol Ecol 4:765–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Eens M, Pinxten R (1996) Female European starlings increase their copulation solicitation rate when faced with the risk of polygyny. Anim Behav 51:1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland JR, Hannon SJ, Dobush G, Boag PT (1995) Extra-pair paternity in willow ptarmigan broods: measuring costs of polygyny to males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1996) Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University, Oxford, pp 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubernick DJ, Nordby JC (1993) Mechanisms of sexual fidelity in the monogamous Californian mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • How TL, Bull CM (2002) Reunion vigour: an experimental test of the mate guarding hypothesis in the monogamous sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. J Zool 257:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Alder HB, Garland T, Bennett AF (1986) Locomotory capacities, oxygen consumption, and the cost of locomotion of the shingle-back lizard (Trachydosaurus rugosus). Physiol Zool 59:523–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Dhondt AA (1995) Mate guarding and copulation behaviour in monogamous and polygynous blue tits: do males follow a best-of-a-bad-job strategy? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr G, Bull CM (2002) Field observations of aggressive encounters between male sleepy lizards Tiliqua rugosa. Herpetol Rev 33:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr GD, Bull CM, Burzacott D (2003) Refuge sites used by the scincid lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Aust Ecol 28:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Krokene C, Anthonisen K, Lifjeld JT, Amundsen T (1996) Paternity and paternity assurance behaviour in the bluethroat, Luscinia s. svecica. Anim Behav 52:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B, Wink M (2000) Frequencies of multiple paternity in three Acrocephalus species (Aves: Sylviidae) with different mating systems (A. palustris, A. arundinaceus, A. paludicola). Ethol Ecol Evol 12:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Tegelstrom H (1997) Extra-pair paternity and tail ornamentation in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill V, Lill A (1998) Mate guarding in the magpie lark. Corella 22:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1993) Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Shine R (1998) Chemosensory mate recognition may facilitate prolonged mate guarding by male snow skinks, Niveoscincus microlepidus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Gullberg A, Tegelstrom H (1996) Malformed offspring, sibling matings, and selection against inbreeding in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J Evol Biol 9:229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombit RA (1996) Pair bonds in monogamous apes: a comparison of the siamang Hylobates syndactylus and the white-handed gibbon Hylobates lar. Behaviour 133:321–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Courtship persistence and female guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce EP, Lifjeld JT (1998) High paternity without paternity-assurance behavior in the purple sandpiper, a species with high paternal investment. Auk 115:602–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten R, Eens M (1997) Copulation and mate guarding patterns in polygynous European starlings. Anim Behav 54:45–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reavis RH (1997) The natural history of a monogamous coral-reef fish Valenciennea strigata (Gobiidae). 2. Behavior, mate fidelity and reproductive success. Environ Biol Fish 49:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reavis RH, Barlow GW (1998) Why is the coral reef fish Valenciennea strigata (Gobiidae) monogamous? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SC, Dunbar RIM (2000) Female territoriality and the function of scent marking in a monogamous antelope (Oreotragus oreotragus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson BC, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J, Moritz CC (2001) Genetic monogamy in the absence of paternity guards: the Capricorn silvereye, Zosterops lateralis chlorocephalus, on Heron Island. Behav Ecol 12:666–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Primmer CR, Ellegren H, Møller AP (1999) Breeding synchrony and paternity in the barb swallow (Hirundo rustica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher B, Hoi H, Valera F, Hoi LM (1997) The importance of different paternity guards in the polygynandrous penduline tit (Remiz pendulinus). Behaviour 134:941–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Somma LA (1990) A categorization and bibliographic survey of parental behavior in lepidosauran reptiles. Smithson Herpetol Inf Serv 81:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukup SS, Thompson CF (1997) Social mating system affects the frequency of extra-pair paternity in house wrens. Anim Behav 54:1089–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1983) Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology. Studies of a model organism. Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 169–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Takegaki T (2000) Monogamous mating system and spawning cycle in the gobiid fish, Amblygobius phalaena (Gobiidae). Environ Biol Fish 59:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Schug MD, Morton ES (1996) Condition-dependent control of paternity by female purple martins: implication for coloniality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallander J, Blomqvist D, Lifjeld JT (2001) Genetic and social monogamy: does it occur without mate guarding in the ringed plover? Ethology 107:561–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W, Seibt U (1983) Monogamy: an ambiguous concept. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 33–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funds from the Australian Research Council and the School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University. We thank Lorraine Baker for field assistance, Dale Burzacott for technical help, and Ron and Leona Clarke for accommodation at Bundey Bore. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Flinders University of South Australia Animal Welfare Committee in compliance with the Australian Code of Practice for the use of animals for scientific purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Michael Bull.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Serrão Santos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, K., Bull, C.M. Aggressiveness during monogamous pairing in the sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa: a test of the mate guarding hypothesis. acta ethol 7, 19–27 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-004-0092-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-004-0092-2

Keywords

Navigation