Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immigrant screening for latent tuberculosis in Norway: a cost-effectiveness analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) disease has increased in Norway since the mid-1990s. Immigrants are screened, and some are treated, for latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent TB disease (reactivation). In this study, we estimated the costs of both treating and screening for LTBI and TB disease, which has not been done previously in Norway. We developed a model to indicate the cost-effectiveness of four different screening algorithms for LTBI using avoided TB disease cases as the health outcome. Further, we calculated the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), and indicated areas of LTBI screening that could be changed to improve cost-effectiveness. The costs of treating LTBI and TB disease were estimated to be €1938 and €15,489 per case, respectively. The model evaluates four algorithms, and suggests three cost-effective algorithms depending on the cost-effectiveness threshold. Screening all immigrants with interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) requires the highest threshold (€28,400), followed by the algorithms “IGRA on immigrants with risk factors” and “no LTBI screening.” EVPI is approximately €5 per screened immigrant. The costs for a cohort of 20,000 immigrants followed through 10 years range from €12.2 million for the algorithm “screening and treatment for TB disease but no LTBI screening,” to €14 million for “screening all immigrants for both TB disease and LTBI with IGRA.” The results suggest that the cost of TB disease screening and treatment is the largest contributor to total costs, while LTBI screening and treatment costs are relatively small. Increasing the proportion of IGRA-positive immigrants who are treated decreases the costs per avoided case substantially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merck: Tuberculosis (TB). http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/infectious_diseases/mycobacteria/tuberculosis_tb.html. (2009). Accessed 7 November 2013

  2. World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis report 2015. WHO http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ (2016). Accessed 13 January 2016

  3. Dye, C., Scheele, S., Dolin, P., Pathania, V., Raviglione, M. C., for the W. H. O. G. S., & Monitoring Project. Global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by country. JAMA. 282(7), 677–686 (1999)

  4. Dagnew, A., Hussein, J., Abebe, M., Zewdie, M., Mihret, A., Bedru, A., Aseffa, A.: Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in healthy young adults in a country with high tuberculosis burden and BCG vaccination at birth. BMC Res Notes 5(1), 415 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Guide on tuberculosis. http://www.fhi.no/eway/default.aspx?pid=239&trg=Main_6157&Main_6157=7139:0:25,5500 (2013). Accessed 7 November 2013

  6. Lin, P.L., Flynn, J.L.: Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J. Immunol. 185(1), 15–22 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnesen, T.M., Eide, K.Å., Norheim, G., Mengshoel, A.T., Sandbu, S., Winje, B.: Tuberculosis in Norway 2013—with treatment results for 2012. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Oslo, Norway (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Countries with high occurrence of tuberculosis. http://www.fhi.no/eway/default.aspx?pid=240&trg=Content_6671&Main_6664=6894:0:25,7555:1:0:0:::0:0&MainContent_6894=6671:0:25,7570:1:0:0:::0:0&List_6673=6674:0:25,7574:1:0:0:::0:0&Content_6671=6683:105433::1:6682:1:::0:0 (2014). Accessed 27 August 2014

  9. Regulations on tuberculosis control. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2009-02-13-205?q=forskrift+om+tuberkulosekontroll (2009). Accessed 7 July 2015

  10. Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Simplified tuberculosis control. http://www.fhi.no/artikler/?id=110976 (2014). Accessed 2 September 2014

  11. Diel, R., Loddenkemper, R., Nienhaus, A.: Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for progression from latent TB infection to disease state: a meta-analysis. Chest J 142(1), 63–75 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nienhaus, A., Schablon, A., Costa, J.T., Diel, R.: Systematic review of cost and cost-effectiveness of different TB-screening strategies. BMC Health Serv Res 11, 247 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, J.R., Sasitharan, T., Marra, F.: A systematic review of studies evaluating the cost utility of screening high-risk populations for latent tuberculosis infection. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 13(4), 325–340 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haukaas, F. S.: Screening immigrants for latent tuberculosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a Norwegian setting. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-44714 (2014). Accessed 7 July 2015

  15. Winje, B., Oftung, F., Korsvold, G., Mannsåker, T., Jeppesen, A., Harstad, I., Heldal, E.: Screening for tuberculosis infection among newly arrived asylum seekers: comparison of QuantiFERON®TB Gold with tuberculin skin test. BMC Infect Dis 8(1), 1–10 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harstad, I., Heldal, E., Steinshamn, S., Garasen, H., Jacobsen, G.: Tuberculosis screening and follow-up of asylum seekers in Norway: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 9(1), 141 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen, A.I.M., Andersen, H.E., Aßmus, J., Djupvik, J.A., Gran, G., Skaug, K., Mørkve, O.: Management of latent tuberculous infection in Norway in 2009: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Public Health Action 3(2), 166–171 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Briggs, A., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M.: Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiker, H., Mustafa, T., Bjune, G., Harboe, M.: Evidence for waning of latency in a cohort study of tuberculosis. BMC Infect. Dis. 10(1), 37 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Economic evaluation of health technologies—a guide: The Norwegian Directorate of Health. https://helsedirektoratet.no/Lists/Publikasjoner/Attachments/624/Okonomisk-evaluering-av-helsetiltak-IS-1985.pdf (2012). Accessed 11 July 2015

  21. Regulations on expenses for outpatient services. http://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2013-12-12-1503 (2013). Accessed 24 April 2014

  22. Statistics Norway: Salary for employees in the health trusts. http://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/lonnstasyk (2013). Accessed 30 January 2014

  23. Norwegian Medical Association: Normaltariff for fastleger og legevakt 2013–2014. http://normaltariffen.legeforeningen.no/pdf/Fastlegetariff_2013.pdf (2013). Accessed 7 July 2014

  24. Regulations on coverage of laboratory expenses. http://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2013-12-17-1562 (2013). Accessed 24 April 2014

  25. Norwegian Medicines Agency: Legemiddelsøk. http://www.legemiddelverket.no/Legemiddelsoek/Sider/default.aspx (2014). Accessed 17 March 2014

  26. The Norwegian Directorate of Health: Innsatsstyrt finansiering 2013. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/innsatsstyrt-finansiering-2013/Publikasjoner/IS-2041_web.pdf (2012). Accessed 7 March 2014

  27. Barton, G.R., Briggs, A.H., Fenwick, E.A.L.: Optimal cost-effectiveness decisions: the role of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC), the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF), and the expected value of perfection information (EVPI). Value Health 11(5), 886–897 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oxlade, O., Pinto, M., Trajman, A., Menzies, D.: How methodologic differences affect results of economic analyses: a systematic review of interferon gamma release assays for the diagnosis of LTBI. PLoS One 8(3), e56044 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ena, J., Valls, V.: Short-course therapy with rifampin plus isoniazid, compared with standard therapy with isoniazid, for latent tuberculosis infection: a meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40(5): 670–676 (2005). http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/5/670.full.pdf

  30. Rennie, T. W., Bothamley, G. H., Engova, D., Bates, I. P.: Patient choice promotes adherence in preventive treatment for latent tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. 30(4): 728–735 (2007). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17626113

  31. Spyridis, N. P., Spyridis, P. G., Gelesme, A., Sypsa, V., Valianatou, M., et al.: The effectiveness of a 9-month regimen of isoniazid alone versus 3- and 4-month regimens of isoniazid plus rifampin for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in children: results of an 11-year randomized study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45(6): 715–722 (2007). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712755

  32. Pareek, M., Watson, J.P., Ormerod, L.P., Kon, O.M., Woltmann, G., White, P.J., Lalvani, A.: Screening of immigrants in the UK for imported latent tuberculosis: a multicentre cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 11(6), 435–444 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Erkens, C.G.M., Dinmohamed, A.G., Kamphorst, M., Toumanian, S., van Nispen-Dobrescu, R., Alink, M., Oudshoorn, N., Mensen, M., van den Hof, S., Borgdorff, M., Verver, S.: Added value of interferon-gamma release assays in screening for tuberculous infection in the Netherlands. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 18(4), 413–420 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mulder, C.: Tuberculosis control among immigrants. In: Mulder, C. (ed) Factulteit der Geneeskunde (2013)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Salvesen Haukaas.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study received no funding. The work was conducted while FSH was employed as an intern at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and was done as part of FSH’s master’s thesis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. FSH is currently an employee of Biogen Norway AS, but Biogen Norway AS had no involvement with the research or the article. The research and the majority of the writing of the article were conducted before FSH was employed by Biogen Norway AS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haukaas, F.S., Arnesen, T.M., Winje, B.A. et al. Immigrant screening for latent tuberculosis in Norway: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Health Econ 18, 405–415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0779-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0779-0

Keywords

JEL-codes

Navigation