Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy and safety of bucillamine as a second-line DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modern Rheumatology

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy and safety of bucillamine administered as a second-line DMARD compared to administration as a first-line DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We conducted a retrospective cohort study and reviewed medical records of 86 patients with active RA who began to receive bucillamine at Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital between January 1998 and July 2004. The efficacy of treatments was compared based on rates of achievement of 20, 50, and 70% improvement in ACR core set 6 months after initiation of the therapy. In the group administered bucillamine as a first-line DMARD (18 patients), 44.4, 22.2, and 11.1% of patients achieved ACR 20, 50, 70, respectively, while 56.5, 34.1, and 19.5% achieved ACR 20, 50, 70, respectively, in the group administered bucillamine following switching from MTX (46 patients), and 53.3, 33.3, and 13.3% achieved ACR 20, 50, and 70, respectively, in the group administered bucillamine following switching from Sulfasalazine (SSZ) (15 patients). The rates of achievements of ACR 20, 50, 70 did not differ statistically between the three groups and there was no increase in risk of serious adverse effects related to previous DMARDs. The usefulness of bucillamine as a second-line DMARD was demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe C. Clinical evaluation of immunomodulators. Int J Immunother. 1985;1:7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kashiwazaki S, Shiokawa Y. Bucillamine: a new immunomodulator. Int J Immunother. 1987;3:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nagashima M, Shu G, Yamamoto K, Yamahatsu S, Yoshino S. The ability of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs to induce and maintain improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology of DMARDs treatment in Japan. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(1):27–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwatani M, Inoue E, Nakamura T, Nakajima A, Hara M, Tomatsu T, et al. Efficacy profile of bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a large observational cohort study, IORRA. Mod Rheumatol. 2006;16(6):376–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mimori T. Anti-rheumatic drugs. In: Ochi T, Yamamoto K, Ryuu J, editors. Manual of diagnosis and guideline for treatment of RA. Tokyo: Japanese rheumatism foundation; 2004. pp. 84–98. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ichikawa Y, Saito T, Yamanaka H, Akizuki M, Kondo H, Kobayashi S, et al. Therapeutic effects of the combination of methotrexate and bucillamine in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Mod Rheumatol. 2005;15:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirohata S, Lipsky PE. Regulation of B cell function by bucillamine, a novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993;66(1):43–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuji F, Seki I, Aono H, Odani N, Mizutani K, Okamoto M, et al. Bucillamine mechanism inhibiting IL–1beta-induced VEGF production from fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007;7(12):1569–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suematsu A, Tajiri Y, Nakashima T, Taka J, Ochi S, Oda H, et al. Scientific basis for the efficacy of combined use of antirheumatic drugs against bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2007;17(1):17–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morabito L, Montesinos MC, Schreibman DM, Balter L, Thompson LF, Resta R, et al. Methotrexate and sulfasalazine promote adenosine release by a mechanism that requires ecto-5′-nucleotidase-mediated conversion of adenine nucleotides. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadangi P, Longaker M, Naime D, Levin RI, Recht PA, Montesinos MC, et al. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of sulfasalazine is related to adenosine release at inflamed sites. J Immunol. 1996;156:1937–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haagsma CJ, Russel FG, Vree TB, Van Riel PL, Van de Putte LB. Combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pharmacokinetic analysis and relationship to clinical response. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42(2):195–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dougados M, Combe B, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Olive P, Schattenkirchner M, et al. Combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind 52-week clinical trial of sulphasalazine and methotrexate compared with the single components. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(4):220–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Riel PLCM, van Gestel AM. Clinical outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59(suppl 1):i28–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yokota N, Kuga Y, Kanazawa T, Morishita M, Tanida K, Itou K. Ten years results of bucillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2007;17(1):33–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, van Zeben D, Kerstens PJ, Hazes JM, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3381–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Salliot C, Gossec L, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Luc M, Duclos M, Guignard S, et al. Infections during tumour necrosis factor-alpha blocker therapy for rheumatic diseases in daily practice: a systematic retrospective study of 709 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(2):327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Curtis JR, Patkar N, Xie A, Martin C, Allison JJ, Saag M, et al. Risk of serious bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis patients exposed to tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(4):1125–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sekiguchi N, Kameda H, Amano K, Takeuchi T. Efficacy and safety of bucillamine, a D-penicillamine analogue, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2006;16(2):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors have no financial interest in this research that could create a potential conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest with regard to the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akiko Suda.

About this article

Cite this article

Suda, A., Nagaoka, S., Ohono, S. et al. The efficacy and safety of bucillamine as a second-line DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study. Mod Rheumatol 18, 609–614 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-008-0103-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-008-0103-7

Keywords

Navigation