Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of liquid- and solid-state coupling anaerobic digestion process on methane production of cow manure and rice straw

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the different characteristics of cow manure and rice straw, liquid- and solid-state coupling anaerobic digestion (L-SS-AD) is designed in this study. In detail, cow dung was fermented in liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD) process, while rice straw was treated in SS-AD process with L-AD digestate as inoculums to get the benefit of both the process. Optimization experiments were systematically performed in both two processes. The results showed that organic loading rate (OLR) of 10.0 kg VS/(m3 d) was possible during the L-AD process, and the average specific methane production (SMP) was 225.2 mL CH4/g VS at a steady state. In addition, in batch test of SS-AD, the lower substrate-to-inoculum ratios (S0/I0) favored the reaction rate and the optimal S0/I0 of 0.9 was selected for further leach-bed experiment. Furthermore, a leach-bed reactor for SS-AD process was operated stably at the average OLRS of 2.17 kg VS/m3 d with the feed interval of 2 weeks. The maximum SMP was 216.13 mL CH4/g VS. Finally, the total energy yield values of 15.45 kJ/g VS can be obtained from the integrated process. L-SS-AD process can improve the efficiency of methane production and provide data preference for full-scale industrial biogas project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen VH, Topno S, Balingbing C, Nguyen VCN, Röder M, Quilty J, Jamieson C, Thornley P, Gummert M (2016) Generating a positive energy balance from using rice straw for anaerobic digestion. Energy Rep 2:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Appels L, Lauwers J, Degrève J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Impe JV, Dewil R (2011) Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: potential and research challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4295–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa JC, Barbosa SG, Alves MM, Sousa DZ (2012) Thermochemical pre- and biological co-treatments to improve hydrolysis and methane production from poultry litter. Bioresour Technol 111:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang M, Li WZ, Liu S, Liu D, Yin LL, Yuan H (2013) Biogas production from chinese herb-extraction residues: influence of biomass composition on methane yield. Bioresources 8:3732–3740

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang PD, Yang YL, Tian YS, Yang XT, Zhang YK, Zheng YH, Wang LS (2009) Bioenergy industries development in China: Dilemma and solution. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:2571–2579

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li H, Tan F, Ke L, Xia D, Wang YP, He N, Zheng YM, Li QB (2016) Mass balances and distributions of C, N, and P in the anaerobic digestion of different substrates and relationships between products and substrates. Chem Eng J 287:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forster-Carneiro T, Pqrez M, Romero LI (2008) Influence of total solid andinoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour Technol 99:6994–7002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown D, Shi J, Li Y (2012) Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 124(11):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu F, Wang F, Lin L, Li Y (2016) Comparison of digestate from solid anaerobic digesters and dewatered effluent from liquid anaerobic digesters as inocula for solid state anaerobic digestion of yard trimmings. Bioresour Technol 200:753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:821–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge X, Xu F, Li Y (2016) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass:recent progress and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 205:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin L, Yang L, Xu F Jr, Li MF (2014) Comparison of solid-state anaerobic digestion and composting of yard trimmings with effluent from liquid anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 169(169C):439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu FQ, Shi J, Lv W, Yu ZT, Li YB (2013) Comparison of different liquid anaerobic digestion effluents as inocula and nitrogen sources for solid-state batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Waste Manag 33:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cui ZF, Shi J, Li YB (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of spent wheat straw from horse stalls. Bioresour Technol 102:9432–9437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y, Zhu J, Wan C, Park S (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover for biogas production. ASABE 54(4):1415–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chynoweth D, Turick C, Owens J, Jerger D, Peck M (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 5(1):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mustafa AM, Poulsen TG, Sheng KC (2016) Fungal pretreatment of rice straw with pleurotusostreatus and trichodermareesei, to enhance methane production under solid-state anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy 180:661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Demirer GN, Chen S (2005) Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure. Process Biochem 40:3542–3549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mähnert P, Linke B (2009) Kinetic study of biogas production from energy crops and animal waste slurry: effect of organic loading rate and reactor size. Environ Technol 30:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Association APH, Association AWW (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  21. Westerholm M, Hansson M, Schnürer A (2012) Improved biogas production from whole stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 114:314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo YP, Fan SQ, Fan YT, Pan CM, Hou HW (2010) The preparation and application of crude cellulase for cellulose-hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(2):459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nopharatana A, Pullammanappallil PC, Clarke WP (2007) Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Manag 27:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia RL, Wei YS, Liu JB (2015) Influencing factors for hydrolysis of sewage sludge pretreated by microwave-H2O2-alkaline process. Huanjing kexue 36(6):2222

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weisis S, Tauber M, Somitsch W, Meincke R, Müller H, Berg G, Guebitz GM (2010) Enhancement of biogas production by addition of hemicellulolytic bacteria immobilised on activated zeolite. Water Res 44:1970–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pohland FG, Ghosh S (1971) Developments in anaerobic stabilization of organic wastes-the two-phase concept. Environ Lett 1:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kougias PG, Boe K, Angelidaki I (2013) Effect of organic loading rate and feedstock composition on foaming in manure-based biogas reactors. Bioresour Technol 144:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindorfer H, Corcoba A, Vasilieva V, Braun R, Kirchmayr R (2008) Doubling the organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and manure—a full scale case study. Bioresour Technol 99:1148–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Comino E, Rosso M, Riggio V (2010) Investigation of increasing organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and cow manure mix. Bioresour Technol 101:3013–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rico C, Montes JA, Muñoz N, Rico JL (2015) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the screened solid fraction of dairy manure in a solid-phase percolating reactor system. J Clean Prod 102:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dirar HA, El Amin HB (1988) Methane fermentation of water hyacinth: effect of solids concentration and inoculum source. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 4:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meng LY, Xie L, Kinh CT, Suenaga T, Hori T, Riya S, Terada A, Hosomi M (2017) Influence of feedstock-to-inoculum ratio on performance and microbial community succession during solid-state thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of pig urine and rice straw. Bioresour Technol 252:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owens JM, Jerger DE, Peck MW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 5(1):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy JB, Young LY, McCarty PL (1979) Biossay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res 13(6):485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li D, Huang XB, Wang QJ, Yuan YX, Yan ZY, Li ZD, Huang YJ, Liu XF (2016) Kinetics of methane production and hydrolysis in anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Energy 102:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chanakya HN, Srikumar KG, Anand V, Modak J, Jagadish KS (1999) Fermentation properties of agro-residues, leaf biomass and urban market garbage in a solid phase biogas fermenter. Biomass Bioenergy 16:417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Torres-Castillo R, Llabrés-Luengo P, Mata-Alvarez J (1995) Temperature effect on anaerobic digestion of bedding straw in a one phase system at different inoculum concentration. Agric Ecosyst Environ 54:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lehtomäki A, Huttunen S, Lehtinen TM, Rintala JA (2008) Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production. Bioresour Technol 99:3267–3278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kvesitadze G, Sadunishvili T, Dudauri T, Zakariashvili N, Partskhaladze G, Ugrekhelidze V, Jobava M (2012) Two-stage anaerobic process for biohydrogen and bio-methane combined production from biodegradable solid wastes. Energy 37(1):94–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (no. 2016M601405), “Young Talents” Project of Northeast Agricultural University (no. 16QC16), Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation for Returnees (no. LC2016015), and Heilongjiang Provincial Youth Science Foundation (no. QC2015049), and the authors are grateful for “Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Technology and Equipment for the Utilization of Agricultural Renewable Resources”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, L., Gong, W., Qin, L. et al. Influence of liquid- and solid-state coupling anaerobic digestion process on methane production of cow manure and rice straw. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 1804–1812 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0750-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0750-5

Keywords

Navigation