Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of biogas production potential from Acacia leaf waste using alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 2nd 3R International Scientific Conference (2nd 3RINCs 2015)
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate possibility of utilizing Acacia leaves (A. mangium and A. auriculiformis), which is an agro-industrial waste from the pulp and paper industry. The effects of alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion with Napier grass for the enhancement of biogas production from Acacia leaf waste (ALW) were investigated. Six continuous stirred tank reactors with a working volume of 5 L were carried out at the laboratory scale. The results showed that pre-treatment of Acacia leaf waste (pretreated ALW) by soaking in 3 % NaOH for 48 h increased the biogas and methane productivity to 0.200 and 0.117 m3/kgVSadded compared to 0.098 and 0.048 m3/kgVSadded of raw ALW digestion, respectively. Meanwhile, the co-digestion of Acacia leaves with different proportions of Napier grass at ratios of 1:1–1:3 in volatile solid basis also increased the production of biogas and its productivity. The maximum gas production yields of 0.424 and 0.268 m3/kgVSadded for biogas and methane were obtained at 1:3 ratio. This finding affirms the potential of ALW and its possibility to use as biogas feedstock in both single and co-substrate with Napier grass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DEDE (2012) The renewable and alternative energy development plan for 25 % in 10 years (AEDP 2012–2021). Department of Alternative Energy Promotion and Efficiency. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Guiza MS, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals s (2014) A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:412–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li C, Champagne P, Anderson BC (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal organic wastes and pre-treatment to enhance biogas production from waste. Water Sci Technol 69(2):443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ngaemngam S, Tezuka T (2006) Effect of energy policy on biomass-based power generation in Thailand. Paper presented at the 2nd joint international conference on sustainable energy and environment (SEE 2006, 21–23 November 2006), Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.jgsee.kmutt.ac.th/see1/cd/file/F-022.pdf. Accessed 28 Jul 2010

  5. Van Bueren M (2004) Acacia hybrids in Vietnam (No. 113223). Australian centre for international agricultural research. http://core.ac.uk/download/files/153/6698978.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014

  6. Shah FA, Mahmood Q, Rashid N, Pervez A, Raja IA, Shah MM (2015) Co-digestion, pretreatment and digester design for enhanced methanogenesis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:627–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liew LN, Shi J, Li Y (2011) Enhancing the solid-state anaerobic digestion of fallen leaves through simultaneous alkaline treatment. Bioresour Technol 102(19):8828–8834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 42:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sambusiti C, Monlau F, Ficara E, Carrère H, Malpei F (2013) A comparison of different pre-treatments to increase methane production from two agricultural substrates. Appl Energy 104:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rebecca AS, Chen Y, Ratna RSS, Michael DB, Jason O (2007) A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour Technol 98:3000–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar KV, Sridevi V, Rani K, Sakunthala M, Kumar CS (2013) A review on production of biogas, fundamentals, applications & its recent enhancing techniques. Chem Eng 57:14073–14079

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mähnert P, Heiermann M, Linke B (2005) Batch-and semi-continuous biogas production from different grass species. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. http://www.cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejournal/article/view/609/603. Accessed 14 Nov 2013

  13. Macias-Corral M, Samani Z, Hanson A, Smith G, Funk P, Yu H, Longworth J (2008) Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect of co-digestion with dairy cow manure. Bioresour Technol 99(17):8288–8293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour Technol 101(11):4021–4028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen G, Zheng Z, Yang S, Fang C, Zou X, Zhang J (2010) Improving conversion of Spartina alterniflora into biogas by co-digestion with cow feces. Fuel Process Technol 91(11):1416–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lei Z, Chen J, Zhang Z, Sugiura N (2010) Methane production from rice straw with acclimated anaerobic sludge: effect of phosphate supplementation. Bioresour Technol 101(12):4343–4348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yong Z, Dong Y, Zhang X, Tan T (2015) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renew Energy 78:527–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diaz JP, Reyes IP, Lundin M, Horvath IS (2011) Co-digestion of different waste mixtures from agro-industrial activities; kinetic evaluation and synergetic effects. Bioresour Technol 102:10834–10840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nizami AS, Orozco A, Groom E, Dieterich B, Murphy JD (2012) How much gas can we get from grass? Appl Energy 92:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wichern M, Gehring T, Fischer K, Andrade D, Lubken M, Koch K, Gronauer A, Horn H (2009) Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM 1. Bioresour Technol 100(4):1675–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Romano RT, Zhang R, Teter S, McGarvey JA (2009) The effect of enzyme addition on anaerobic digestion of JoseTall Wheat Grass. Bioresour Technol 100(20):4564–4571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Asam ZZ, Poulsen TG, Nizami AS, Rafique R, Kiely G, Murphy JD (2011) How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants? Appl Energy 88(6):2013–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Janejadkarn A, Chavalparit O (2014) Biogas production from Napier Grass (Pak Chong 1) (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum). Adv Mater Res 856:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nizami AS, Murphy JD (2010) What type of digester configuration should be employed to produce biomethane from grass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1558–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Federation WE, American Public Health Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC, USA

  26. Panichnumsin P, Nopharatana A, Ahring B, Chaiprasert P (2010) Production of methane by co-digestion of cassava pulp with various concentrations of pig manure. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang C, Xiao G, Peng L, Su H, Tan T (2013) The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 129:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu X, Yao W, Zhu J, Miller C (2010) Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresour Technol 101:4042–4047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luste S, Luostarinen S, Sillanpää M (2009) Effect of pretreatments on hydrolysis and methane production potentials of by-products from meat-rocessing industry. J Hazard Mater 164(1): 247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hendriks A, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Plöchl M, Heiermann M (2006) Biogas farming in Central and Northern Europe: a strategy for developing countries? Invited Overview. Agric Eng Int CIGR EJ. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/10559. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  32. Wu W (2000) Anaerobic co-digestion of biomass for methane production. http://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~tge/ce421-521/wei.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2014

  33. Aragaw T, Andargie M, Gessesse A (2013) Co-digestion of cattle manure with organic kitchen waste to increase biogas production using rumen fluid as inoculums. Int J Phys Sci 8(11):443–450

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund) and National Research University Project, Office of Higher Education Commission (WCU-58-020-CC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orathai Chavalparit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaiyapong, P., Chavalparit, O. Enhancement of biogas production potential from Acacia leaf waste using alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18, 427–436 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0469-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0469-0

Keywords

Navigation