Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal adenoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is no consensus on the treatment and prognosis of malignant rectal polyps. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after endoscopic complete polypectomy of malignant rectal adenomas with long-term follow-up.

Methods

Of 105 patients with pT1 rectal carcinoma in 32 patients TEM followed complete endoscopic polypectomy while 73 had primary TEM. Local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis, overall and cancer-specific survival were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Median follow-up was 9.1 years. In 32 patients with TEM following complete polypectomy no residual cancer was found. LR occurred in 3/28 (11%) patients with low-risk carcinoma (pT1 G1/2/X, L0/X, R0) and in 1/4 (25%) with high-risk carcinoma (pT1 G3/4 or L1). After primary TEM with complete resection (minimal distance >1 mm) LR occurred in 6/60 (10%) with low-risk carcinoma. After incomplete TEM resection (minimal distance ≤1 mm) LR occurred in 3/8 (38%) patients with low-risk and in 1/5 (20%) patients with high-risk carcinoma. Grading was the only significant risk factor for LR after endoscopic polypectomy followed by TEM (p = 0.002). At all outcomes did not differ between postpolypectomy TEM and primary TEM.

Conclusions

Patients with malignant rectal polyps removed by endoscopic polypectomy have a substantial risk of LR even if TEM of polyp site is cancer free. Risk of LR depends on tumor characteristics. In low-risk carcinoma long-term follow-up is necessary. The high LR rate in patients with high-risk rectal carcinoma restricts the use of TEM alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper HS (1983) Surgical pathology of endoscopically removed malignant polyps of the colon an rectum. Am J Surg Pathol 7:613–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arezzo A, Bianco F, Agresta F, Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery et al (2015) Practice parameters for early rectal cancer management: Italian society of colorectal surgery (Societa Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 19:587–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermanek P, Gall FP (1986) Early (microinvasive) colorectal carcinoma. Pathology, diagnosis, surgical treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 1:79–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Volk EE, Goldblum JR, Petras RE, Carey WD, Fazio VW (1995) Management and outcome of patients with invasive carcinoma arising in colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 109:1801–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Netzer P, Forster C, Biral R et al (1998) Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps. Gut 48:669–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seitz U, Bohnacker S, Seewald S et al (2004) Is endoscopic polypectomy an adequate therapy for malignant colorectal adenomas? Presentation of 114 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1789–1797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bujanda L, Cosme A, Gil I, Arenas-Mirave JI (2010) Malignant colorectal polyps. World J Gastroent 16:3103–3111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Floyd ND, Saclarides TJ (2005) Transanal endoscopic resection of pT1 rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arolfo S, Allaix ME, Migliore M, Cravero F, Arezzo A, Morino M (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic resection of malignant rectal polyps: a useful technique for indication to radical treatment. Surg Endosc 28:1136–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coverlizza S, Risio M, Ferrari A, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Rossini FP (1989) Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential. Cancer 64:1937–1947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Junginger T, Goenner U, Hitzler M et al (2016) Long-term oncological outcome after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 59:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD (1992) Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 163:63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K et al (1995) Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1286–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR (2002) Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 45:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Core Team R (2014) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper HS, Deppisch LM, Gourley WK et al (1995) Endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps: clinicopathologic correlations. Gastroenterology 108:1657–1665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paty PB, Nash GM, Baron P et al (2002) Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 236:522–530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JRT et al (2009) A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:280–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tytherleigh MG, Warren BF, Mortensen NJMcC (2008) Management of early rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:409–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhangu A, Brown G, Nicholls RJ, Wong J, Darzi A, Tekkis P (2013) Survival outcome of local excision versus radical resection of colon and rectal carcinoma. A surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) population-based study. Ann Surg 258:563–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Junginger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1984 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent for data collection and evaluation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junginger, T., Goenner, U., Hitzler, M. et al. Long-term results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal adenoma. Tech Coloproctol 21, 225–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1595-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1595-y

Keywords

Navigation