Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using microdialysis of the peritoneal cavity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Early detection of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) may lead to better outcome. AL may be preceded by change in local metabolism and local ischaemia. Microdialysis of the peritoneal cavity is able to measure these changes in real-time and is minimally invasive. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare values of intraperitoneal microdialysis in patients with AL to patients without AL after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

Twenty-four patients underwent surgery for left-sided, sigmoid and rectal carcinoma with creation of an anastomosis. Intraoperatively a juxta-anastomotical intraperitoneal and subcutaneous microdialysis catheter was placed. The levels of lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol in the dialysate were measured every 4 h during the first 5 post-operative days, and mean values and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results

Mortality was 0 % and morbidity 38 %. In 3 patients (17 %), AL occurred. In patients with AL, post-operative peritoneal lactate level was 3.2 mmol/l (standard deviation (SD) 0.9) for patients without AL, compared to 4.4 mmol/l (SD 1.5) in case of AL (p = 0.03 for AUC). Intraperitoneal glucose levels were 8.1 mmol/l (SD 1.3), compared to 7.8 mmol/l (SD 2.2) in the complicated course (ns for AUC). Mean intraperitoneal lactate/pyruvate-ratio was 19.2 (SD 3) after colorectal surgery without AL compared to 25 (SD 4.7) in case of AL (non-significant (ns) for AUC). No significant differences were observed between patients who underwent laparoscopic resection and those who underwent open resection.

Conclusions

Anastomotic leakage was preceded by a significantly higher AUC and mean value of lactate levels during the first 5 post-operative days. To identify cut-off values for clinical use, pooling of data is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H (2012) A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e661–e667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck TH, Shekarriz H, Bruch HP (2004) Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:128–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alberts JC, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ (2003) Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis 5:478–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dekker JW, Liefers GJ, de Mol van Otterloo JC, Putter H, Tollenaar RA (2011) Predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage in left-sided colorectal surgery using a colon leakage score. J Surg Res 166:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:259–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fouda E, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Hammad EA, Othman G, Farid M (2011) Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection. J Gastrointest Surg 15:137–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Komen N, de Bruin RW, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2008) Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker. A review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 10:109–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uğras B, Giris M, Erbil Y et al (2008) Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by measuring peritoneal cytokines: prospective study. Int J Surg 6:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bertram P, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Gotze C, Kunz D, Schumpelick V (2003) Peritoneal release of TNFalpha and IL-6 after elective colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage. J Invest Surg 16:65–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Komen N, Morsink MC, Beiboer S et al (2009) Detection of colon flora in peritoneal drain fluid after colorectal surgery: can RT-PCR play a role in diagnosing anastomotic leakage? J Microbiol Methods 79:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER et al (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:420–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ, van Tets WF (2007) Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 13:3721–3725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellows CF, Webber LS, Albo D, Awad S, Berger DH (2009) Early predictors of anastomotic leaks after colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 13:41–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O et al (2010) C-reactive protein is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:808–814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Welsch T, Müller SA, Ulrich A et al (2007) C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1499–1507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woeste G, Muller C, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2010) Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein precede anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:140–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansson K, Ungerstedt J, Jonsson T et al (2003) Human intraperitoneal microdialysis: increased lactate/pyruvate ratio suggests early visceral ischaemia. A pilot study. Scand J Gastroenterol 38:1007–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ungerstedt J, Nowak G, Ericzon BG, Ungerstedt U (2003) Intraperitoneal microdialysis (IPM): a new technique for monitoring intestinal ischemia studied in a porcine model. Shock 20:91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellebaek Pedersen M, Qvist N, Bisgaard C, Kelly U, Bernhard A, Møller Pedersen S (2009) Peritoneal microdialysis. Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer. Scand J Surg 98:148–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jansson K, Redler B, Truedsson L, Magnuson A, Ungerstedt U, Norgren L (2004) Postoperative on-line monitoring with intraperitoneal microdialysis is a sensitive clinical method for measuring increased anaerobic metabolism that correlates to the cytokine response. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:434–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matthiessen P, Strand I, Jansson K et al (2007) Is early detection of anastomotic leakage possible by intraperitoneal microdialysis and intraperitoneal cytokines after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 50:1918–1927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horer TM, Norgren L, Jansson K (2011) Intraperitoneal glycerol levels and lactate/pyruvate ratio: early markers of postoperative complications. Scand J Gastroenterol 46:913–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA (2007) Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg 245:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Macarthur DC, Nixon SJ, Aitken RJ (1998) Avoidable deaths still occur after large bowel surgery. Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Br J Surg 85:80–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gianotti L, Nespoli L, Rocchetti S, Vignali A, Nespoli A, Braga M (2011) Gut oxygenation and oxidative damage during and after laparoscopic and open left-sided colon resection: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc 25:1835–1843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pascual M, Alonso S, Pares D et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 98:50–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank DSW-health insurance, Schiedam, The Netherlands and the Scientific Activity Committee of the Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, The Netherlands and Stichting BG, Delft, The Netherlands for their financial contribution to this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Daams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daams, F., Wu, Z., Cakir, H. et al. Identification of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using microdialysis of the peritoneal cavity. Tech Coloproctol 18, 65–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1020-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1020-0

Keywords

Navigation