Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure for fecal peritonitis resulting from perforation of the left-sided colon in elderly and severely ill patients

  • Multimedia Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Traditional treatment for fecal peritonitis resulting from perforation of the left-sided colon has been performed using Hartmann’s procedure to reduce the high mortality caused by anastomotic leakage. However, the morbidity rates associated with abdominal incision (due in great part to wound infection, and dehiscence of abdominal fascia) are high. Therefore, we propose using laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure with abdominal incisions only for the port site to reduce the high morbidity associated with the laparoscopic procedure as compared to open surgery.

Methods

Between April 2008 and July 2011, we treated 16 consecutive patients (median age, 83 years) with fecal peritonitis resulting from perforations in the left-sided colon due to various causes. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score of each patient was either IV or V. Patients underwent a four-port laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure. Specimens were extracted through the stoma site. Irrigation of the abdominal cavity with more than 10 L of saline was performed in every case, as was insertion of three 10-mm silicon drains via the port site into the left- and right subphrenic spaces or the pouch of Douglas.

Results

The median total surgical time was 166 min (range, 123–250 min). There were no intraoperative complications, and there was no need to convert to open surgery. Fourteen patients survived. There was no wound infection or dehiscence of abdominal fascia. Successful laparoscopic reversals of the laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure were performed in all 14 survivors.

Conclusions

This laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure is a promising surgical strategy for treating fecal peritonitis arising from perforation of the left-sided colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zingg U, Pasternak I, Dietrich M, Seifert B, Oertli D, Metzger U (2010) Primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure in patients undergoing emergency left colectomy for perforated diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 12:54–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Breitenstein S, Kraus A, Hahnloser D, Decurtins M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure? A case-matched control study. World J Surg 31:2117–2124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH (1985) Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chouillard E, Maggiori L, Ata T et al (2007) Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1157–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin ME Jr, Portillo G, Trevin JM, Gonzalez JJ, Glass JL (2009) Long-term experience with the laparoscopic approach to perforated diverticulitis plus generalized peritonitis. World J Surg 32:1507–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karoui M, Champault A, Pautrat K, Valleur P, Cherqui D, Champault G (2009) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma for Hinchey 3 complicated diverticulitis: results of a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:609–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Waal BJM, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ (2010) Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faure JP, Doucet C, Essique D et al (2007) Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann’s colostomy reversal. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:495–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dharmarajan S, Hunt SR, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW, Mutch MG (2011) The efficacy of nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 54:663–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alamili M, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2009) Acute complicated diverticulitis managed by laparoscopic lavage. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Uematsu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 83104 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uematsu, D., Akiyama, G., Magishi, A. et al. Laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure for fecal peritonitis resulting from perforation of the left-sided colon in elderly and severely ill patients. Tech Coloproctol 16, 243–246 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0828-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0828-3

Keywords

Navigation