Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term Experience with the Laparoscopic Approach to Perforated Diverticulitis plus Generalized Peritonitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The treatment of perforated diverticulitis is changing form the current standard of laparotomy with resection, Hartmann procedure, and colostomy to a minimally invasive technique. In patients with complicated acute diverticulitis and peritonitis without gross fecal contamination, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, inspection of the colon, and intraoperative drain placement of the peritoneal cavity appears to alleviate morbidity and improve the outcome. In this article, we report our experience of a laparoscopic peritoneal lavage technique with delayed definitive resection when necessary.

Method and materials

Records of patients who underwent intraoperative peritoneal lavage for purulent diverticulitis at the Texas Endosurgery Institute from April 1991 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Forty patients were included in the study, with a male/female ratio of 26:14. The average age was 60 years. Many had associated co-morbidities. The average operating time was 62 minutes. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Apart from mild postoperative paralytic ileus in six patients and chest infections in two, there were no significant peroperative or postoperative complications. Just over 50% underwent elective interval laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. During the mean follow-up of 96 months, none of the other patients required further surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic lavage of the peritoneal cavity and drainage is a safe alternative to the current standard of treatment for the management of perforated diverticulitis with or without gross fecal contamination. It is associated with a decrease in the overall cost of treatment; the use of a colostomy is avoided; patient improvement is immediate; and there is a reduction in mortality and morbidity as definitive laparoscopic resection can be performed in a nonemergent fashion. Perhaps the most important benefit, other than avoiding a colostomy, is the association of fewer wound complications such as dehiscence, wound infection, and the high risk of hernia formation. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage should be considered in all patients in whom medical and/or percutaneous treatment is not feasible. It carries minimal morbidity and should be considered the standard of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bahadursingh AM, Virgo KS, Kaminski DL et al (2003) Spectrum of disease and outcome of complicated diverticular disease. Am J Surg 186:696–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salzman H, Lillie D (2005) Diverticular disease. Am Fam Physician 72:1229–1234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stollman NH, Raskin JB (1999) Diagnosis and management of diverticular disease of the colon in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elfrink RJ, Miedema BW (1992) Colonic diverticula: when complications require surgery and when they don’t. Postgrad Med 92(6):97–98, 101–102, 105, 108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks TG, Conel AM (1971) The outcome in 455 patients admitted for treatment of diverticular disease of the colon. Br J Surg 57:775–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1953–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C et al (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage: results of a multicenter study; Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc 13:639–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin ME, Dorman JP, Jacobs M et al (1997) Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease? Surg Endosc 11:1021–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergamaschi R, Tuetch JJ, Pessaux P et al (2000) Intracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 14:520–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S et al (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes ESR, Cuthbertson AM, Carden ABG (1963) The surgical management of acute diverticulitis. Med J Aust 1:780–782

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Sullivan GC, Murphy D, O’Brien MG (1996) Laparoscopic management of generalized peritonitis due to perforated colon diverticula. Am J Surg 171:432–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rothenberger DA, Wiltz O (1993) Surgery for complicated diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 5:975–992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman J, Davies M, Wolff B et al (2005) Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules? Ann Surg 242:576–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Senagore AJ (2005) Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Clin N Am 85:19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambrosetti P, Chautems R, Soravia C et al (2005) Long-term outcome of mesocolic and pelvic diverticular abscesses of the left colon: a prospective study of 73 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 48:787–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Rose J et al (2004) Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1883–1888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Regenet N, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P et al (2002) Intraoperative colonic lavage with primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticular disease of the colon: a consecutive study. Hepatogastroenterology 49:664–647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greco RS, Kamath C, Nosher JL (1982) Percutaneous drainage of peridivertiuclar abscess followed by primary sigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 25:53–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saini S, Mueller PR, Wittenberg J et al (1986) Percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses. Arch Surg 121:475–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Da Rold AR, Guerriero S, Fiamingo P et al (2004) Laparoscopic colorrhaphy, irrigation and drainage in the treatment of complicated acute diverticulitis: initial experience. Chir Ital 56:95–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faranda C, Barrat C, Catheline JM et al (2000) Two-stage laparoscopic management of generalized peritonitis due to perforated sigmoid diverticula: eighteen cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:135–138; discussion 139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Portillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin, M.E., Portillo, G., Treviño, J.M. et al. Long-term Experience with the Laparoscopic Approach to Perforated Diverticulitis plus Generalized Peritonitis. World J Surg 32, 1507–1511 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9463-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9463-y

Keywords

Navigation