Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of local anesthetics in preventing postoperative adhesions in rat models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intra-abdominal adhesions are fibrous bands that develop after abdominal surgery or inflammation and cause significant surgical morbidity and mortality. In this study, the effectiveness of lidocaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in preventing experimental intra-abdominal adhesions in rats was studied.

Methods

After obtaining the approval of our local institutional review board, 50 female Wistar-Albino rats weighing 250–320 g underwent laparotomy via a standard 5-cm midline incision under intramuscular anesthesia with ketamine (40 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). The cecal serosa and adjacent abdominal wall were superficially injured using sterile gauze. The laparotomy incision was closed after irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with the following: 5 ml saline in Group II, (the sham group), 7 mg/kg prilocaine in Group III, 3 mg/kg lidocaine in Group IV or 2 mg/kg bupivacaine in Group V. No irrigation was performed in Group I rats (the control group). After laparotomy closure, all rats were allowed to wake spontaneously. Two weeks after the initial experimental procedure, all rats underwent a second laparotomy, and adhesions were scored using the Linsky scale.

Results

The adhesion quantity and quality were comparable among all groups (P > 0.05); however, adhesion severity scores were significantly lower in the prilocaine and bupivacaine groups vs. the other groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Prilocaine and bupivacaine were found to decrease the severity of intra-peritoneal adhesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesion how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thampson JN et al (1999) Adhesion related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476–1480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Cherney AH, Dizerega GS (1997) Clinical problem of peritoneal adhesion formation following general surgery and use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg Clin North Am 77:671–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivarsson ML, Holmdahl L, Franzen G, Risberg B (1997) Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. Eur J Surg 163:679–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray NF, Larsen JW Jr, Stillman RJ, Jacobs RJ (1993) Economic impact of hospitalisations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gyn Obs 176:271–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson JN (1995) Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation. Br J Surg 82:3–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yilmazlar T, Kaya E, Gürpinar E, Emiroğlu H (1996) Efficacy of tenoxicam on intra-abdominal adhesion prevention in a rat model. J Int Med Res 24:352–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollmann MW, Durieux ME (2000) Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 93:858–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borg T, Modig J (1985) Potential antithrombic effects of local anaesthetics due to their inhibition of platelet aggregation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 297:739–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bredbacka S, Blombäck M, Hägnevik K, Irestedt L, Raabe N (2008) Per- and postoperative changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic variables during abdominal hysterectomy under epidural or general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 30:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liebman SM, Langer JC, Marshall JS, Collins SM (1993) Role of mast cell in peritoneal adhesion formation. Am J Surg 165:127–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Linsky CB, Diamond MP, Cunningham T, Constantine B, De Cherney AH, di Zerega GS (1987) Adhesion reduction in a rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. J Reprod Med 32:17–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ching SS, Muralikrisnan VP, Whiteley GS (2003) Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome. Int J Clin Pract 57:333–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ar’Rajab A, Dawidson I, Sentementes J, Alsikes P, Harris R, Mileski W (1995) Enhancement of peritoneal macrophages reduces postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation. J Surg Res 58:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boland GM, Weigel RJ (2006) Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 132:3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta S, Jain PK (1985) Low-dose heparin in experimental peritonitis. Eur Surg Res 17:167–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Türkçapar AG, Özarslan C, Erdem E, Bumin C, Ervedi N, Kutlay J (1995) The effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin on adhesion formation in experimental rat model. Int Surg 80:92–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tayyar M, Başbuğ M (1999) The effects of intraperitoneal piroxicam and low molecular weight heparin in prevention of adhesion reformation in rat uterine horn. Res Exp Med 198:269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rejinen MM, Bleichrodt RP, Van Goor H (2003) Pathophysiology of intraperitoneal adhesion and abcess formation, and the effect of hyaluronan. Br J Surg 90:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruetsch YA, Boni T, Borgeat A (2001) From cocaine to ropivacaine : the history of local anesthetic drugs. Curr Top Med Chem 1:175–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Becker DE, Reed KL (2006) Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog 53:98–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was edited by American Journal Experts. The authors wish to thank Dr. K. Bielecki for the thorough review of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this study have no financial disclosures or conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ozturk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozturk, E., Yilmazlar, A., Berhuni, S. et al. The effectiveness of local anesthetics in preventing postoperative adhesions in rat models. Tech Coloproctol 14, 337–340 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0644-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0644-6

Keywords

Navigation