Abstract
Antler regeneration, a stem cell–based epimorphic process, has a potential as a valuable model for regenerative medicine. A pool of antler stem cells (ASCs) for antler development is located in the antlerogenic periosteum (AP). However, whether this ASC pool is homogenous or heterogeneous has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we produced a comprehensive transcriptome dataset at the single-cell level for the ASCs based on the 10× Genomics platform (scRNA-seq). A total of 4565 ASCs were sequenced and classified into a large cell cluster, indicating that the ASC resident in the AP are likely to be a homogeneous population. The scRNA-seq data revealed that tumor-related genes were highly expressed in these homogeneous ASCs, i.e., TIMP1, TMSB10, LGALS1, FTH1, VIM, LOC110126017, and S100A4. Results of screening for stem cell markers suggest that the ASCs may be considered as a special type of stem cell between embryonic (CD9) and adult (CD29, CD90, NPM1, and VIM) stem cells. Our results provide the first comprehensive transcriptome analysis at the single-cell level for the ASCs and identified only one major cell type resident in the AP and some key stem cell genes, which may hold the key to why antlers, the unique mammalian organ, can fully regenerate once lost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg DK, Li C, Asher G, Wells DN, Oback B (2007) Red deer cloned from antler stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Biol Reprod 77:384–394. https://doi.org/10.1065/biolrepod.106.058172
Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in largenetworks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics. 2008:155–168https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Bramanti V, Tomassoni D, Avitabile M, Amenta F, Avola R (2010) Biomarkers of glial cell proliferation and differentiation in culture. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2:558–570
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R (2018) Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol 36:411–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096
Chu W, Zhao H, Li J, Li C (2017) Custom-built tools for the study of deer antler biology. Front Biosci (Landmark edition) 22:1622–1633
Colucci-Guyon E, Portier MM, Dunia I, Paulin D, Pournin S, Babinet C (1994) Mice lacking vimentin develop and reproduce without an obvious phenotype. Cell 79:679–694
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Gardiner DM, Endo T, Bryant SV (2002) The molecular basis of amphibian limb regeneration: integrating the old with the new. Semin Cell Dev Biol 13:345–352
Goldman RD, Khuon S, Chou YH, Opal P, Steinert PM (1996) The function of intermediate filaments in cell shape and cytoskeletal integrity. J Cell Biol 134:971–983
Goss RJ (1995) Future directions in antler research. Anat Rec 241:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092410302
Goss RJ, Powel RS (1985) Induction of deer antlers by transplanted periosteum. I Graft size and shape. J Exp Zool 235:359–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402350307
Hartwig H, Schrudde J (1974) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Bildung der primaren Stirnauswuchse beim Reh (Capreolus capreolus L.). Z Jagdwiss 20:1–13
Houle J, Fedoroff S (1983) Temporal relationship between the appearance of vimentin and neural tube development. Brain Res 285:189–195
Huang LY, Xu Y, Cai GX, Guan ZQ, Cai SJ (2012) Downregulation of S100A4 expression by RNA interference suppresses cell growth and invasion in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep 27:917–922. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1598
Jung S, Yi L, Kim J, Jeong D, Oh T, Kim CH, Kim CJ, Shin J, An S, Lee MS (2011) The role of vimentin as a methylation biomarker for early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Mol Cell 31:405–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-0229-x
Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H, Szuwart T (2007) Deer antler regeneration: cells, concepts, and controversies. J Morphol 268:726–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10546
Kierdorf U, Li CY, Price JS (2009) Improbable appendages: deer antler renewal as a unique case of mammalian regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.11.011
Kim YS, Kim SH, Kang JG, Ko JH (2012) Expression level and glycan dynamics determine the net effects of TIMP-1 on cancer progression. BMB Rep 45:623–628. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2012.45.11.233
Kumar P, Tan YQ, Cahan P (2017) Understanding development and stem cells using single cell-based analyses of gene expression. Development 144:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.133058
Li CY (2012) Deer antler regeneration: a stem cell-based epimorphic Process. Birth Defects Res C 96:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.21000
Li C, Suttie JM (1994) Light microscopic studies of pedicle and early first antler development in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Anat Rec 239:198–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092390211
Li C, Suttie JM (2001) Deer antlerogenic periosteum: a piece of postnatally retained embryonic tissue? Anat Embryol (Berl) 204:375–388
Li C, Suttie JM (2003) Tissue collection methods for antler research. Eur J Morphol 41:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1076/ejom.41.1.23.28106
Li C, Littlejohn RP, Suttie JM (1999) Effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 and testosterone on the proliferation of antlerogenic cells in vitro. J Exp Zool 284:82–90
Li CY, Clark DE, Lord EA, Stanton JAL, Suttie JM (2002) Sampling technique to discriminate the different tissue layers of growing antler tips for gene discovery. Anat Rec 268:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10120
Li C, Suttie JM, Clark DE (2005) Histological examination of antler regeneration in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 282:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.20148
Li C, Yang F, Li G, Gao X, Xing X, Wei H, Deng X, Clark DE (2007a) Antler regeneration: a dependent process of stem tissue primed via interaction with its enveloping skin. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 307:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.352
Li CY, Mackintosh CG, Martin SK, Clark DE (2007b) Identification of key tissue type for antler regeneration through pedicle periosteum deletion. Cell Tissue Res 328:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-006-0333-y
Li C, Yang F, Sheppard A (2009) Adult stem cells and mammalian epimorphic regeneration-insights from studying annual renewal of deer antlers. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 4:237–251
Li C, Harper A, Puddick J, Wang W, McMahon C (2012) Proteomes and signalling pathways of antler stem cells. PLoS One 7:e30026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030026
Lindstrom MS (2011) NPM1/B23: a multifunctional chaperone in ribosome biogenesis and chromatin remodeling. Biochem Res Int 2011:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/195209
Liu FT (2005) Regulatory roles of galectins in the immune response. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 136:385–400. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084545
Liu S, Trapnell C (2016) Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remainingchallenges. F1000research 5 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7223.1
Lord EA, Clark DE, Martin SK, Pedersen GM, Gray JP, Li CY (2004) Profiling genes expressed in the regenerating tip of red deer (cervua elaphus) antler. Paper presented at the In advances in antler science and product technology
Ma X, Yang YX, Wang YF, An GF, Lv G (2010) Small interfering RNA-directed knockdown of S100A4 decreases proliferation and invasiveness of osteosarcoma cells. Cancer Lett 299:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2010.08.016
Mescher AL (1996) The cellular basis of limb regeneration in urodeles. Int J Dev Biol 40:785–795
Mount JG, Muzylak M, Allen S, Althnaian T, Mcgonnell IM, Price JS (2006) Evidence that thecanonical Wnt signalling pathway regulates deer antler regeneration
Park HJ, Lee DH, Park SG, Lee SC, Cho S, Kim HK, Kim JJ, Bae H, Park BC (2004) Proteome analysis of red deer antlers. Proteomics 4:3642–3653. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401027
Price J, Faucheux C, Allen S (2005a) Deer antlers as a model of mammalian regeneration. Curr Top Dev Biol 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(05)67001-9
Price JS, Allen S, Faucheux C, Althnaian T, Mount JG (2005b) Deer antlers: a zoological curiosity or the key to understanding organ regeneration in mammals? J Anat 207:603–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00478.x
Rabinovich GA, Liu FT, Hirashima M, Anderson A (2007) An emerging role for galectins in tuning the immune response: lessons from experimental models of inflammatory disease, autoimmunity and cancer. Scand J Immunol 66:143–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01986.x
RJ G (1983) Deer antlers. regeneration, function and evolution. Academic Press, New York
Rolf HJ, Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H, Schulz J, Seymour N, Schliephake H, Napp J, Niebert S, Wölfel H, Wiese KG (2008) Localization and characterization of STRO-1 cells in the deer pedicle and regenerating antler. PLoS One 3:e2064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002064
Santelli G, Califano D, Chiappetta G, Vento MT, Bartoli PC, Zullo F, Trapasso F, Viglietto G, Fusco A (1999) Thymosin beta-10 gene overexpression is a general event in human carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 155:799–804
Seo MS, Park SB, Choi SW, Kim JJ, Kim HS, Kang KS (2014) Isolation and characterization of antler-derived multipotent stem cells. Cell Transplant 23:831–843. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X661391
Sherbet GV (2009) Metastasis promoter S100A4 is a potentially valuable molecular target for cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 280:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.10.037
Sribenja S, Li M, Wongkham S, Wongkham C, Yao Q, Chen C (2009) Advances in thymosin beta10 research: differential expression, molecular mechanisms, and clinical implications in cancer and other conditions. Cancer Investig 27:1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.3109/07357900902849640
Stocum D (2006) Regenerative biology and medicine. Academic Press, New York
Torti SV, Torti FM (2013) Iron and cancer: more ore to be mined. Nat Rev Cancer 13:342–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3495
Wang D, Guo Q, Ba H, Li C (2016) Cloning and characterization of a Nanog pseudogene in sika deer (Cervus nippon). DNA and Cell Biology 35:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2016.3303
Wang DT, Chu WH, Sun HM, Ba HX, Li CY (2017) Expression and functional analysis of tumor-related factor S100A4 in antler stem cells. J Histochem Cytochem 65:579–591. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155417727263
Yan KS, Gevaert O, Zheng GXY, Anchang B, Probert CS, Larkin KA, Davies PS, Cheng ZF, Kaddis JS, Han A, Roelf K, Calderon RI, Cynn E, Hu X, Mandleywala K, Wilhelmy J, Grimes SM, Corney DC, Boutet SC, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ziraldo SB, Mikkelsen TS, Wang F, von Furstenberg RJ, Smith NR, Chandrakesan P, May R, Chrissy MAS, Jain R, Cartwright CA, Niland JC, Hong YK, Carrington J, Breault DT, Epstein J, Houchen CW, Lynch JP, Martin MG, Plevritis SK, Curtis C, Ji HP, Li L, Henning SJ, Wong MH, Kuo CJ (2017) Intestinal enteroendocrine lineage cells possess homeostatic and injury-inducible stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell 21:78–90 e76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.06.014
Yu PJ, Lin W (2016) Single-cell transcriptome study as big data. Genom Proteom Bioinf 14:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2016.01.005
Zhang X, Ren D, Guo L, Wang L, Wu S, Lin C, Ye L, Zhu J, Li J, Song L, Lin H, He Z (2017) Thymosin beta 10 is a key regulator of tumorigenesis and metastasis and a novel serum marker in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 19:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0785-2
Zhang W, Chu W, Liu Q, Coates D, Shang Y, Li C (2018) Deer thymosin beta 10 functions as a novel factor for angiogenesis and chondrogenesis during antler growth and regeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther 9:166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0917-y
Zheng GX et al (2017) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Drs. Peter Fennessy and Eric Lord for reading through the paper and giving valuable comments.
Funding
This work was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA16010403), Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20170101003JC) and Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. 1610342019026).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.B., D.W., and C.L. conceived the experiment. D.W. collected the samples and performed molecular- and cell-related experiments. H.S. cultured the cell lines. W.W. extracted the RNA samples and prepared them for single-cell 3′ library construction and sequencing. H.B. performed QC and data analysis. H.B., W.W., and C.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Figure S1.
Detection of variable genes across the ASCs. A total of 2415 variable genes were selected by using FindVariableGenes function (x.low.cutoff = 0.01, x.high.cutoff = 4, y.cutoff=0.3) in Seurat R package. The parameters identify ~2943 variable genes. (JPG 1611 kb)
Figure S2.
Standard deviation of principal components. To assess the true dimensionality of our dataset, the first 30 principal components were deemed as a cutoff, as there is a clear elbow in the graph. (JPG 413 kb)
Table S1.
List of Antibodies (DOCX 19 kb)
Table S2.
Summary of scRNA-seq data quality (DOCX 22 kb)
Table S3.
Summary of single cell sequencing data (DOCX 14 kb)
Table S4.
Summary of top 35 highly expressed genes in the scRNA-seq data. (XLSX 13 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ba, H., Wang, D., Wu, W. et al. Single-cell transcriptome provides novel insights into antler stem cells, a cell type capable of mammalian organ regeneration. Funct Integr Genomics 19, 555–564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-019-00659-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-019-00659-2