Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with noncompliance of recommendations made by emergency radiologists. Between March 2012 and August 2012, our team retrospectively reviewed 20,000 consecutive emergency department (ED) patients receiving imaging to assess how often emergency radiologists made recommendations, how often they were followed, and what factors were associated with noncompliance. Faculty (Radiology or Emergency Medicine) were considered senior if they had been practicing for >5 years post residency/fellowship training. Faculty practicing <5 years were considered junior physicians. The following data was extracted from the electronic medical records and the hospital information system: recommendation in imaging report, age, gender, race (Caucasian, African-American, and others), insurance status, primary care contact, distance from the hospital to patient residence, and primary language. Recommendations were categorized as follows: (1) immediate follow-up, (2) follow-up 1–4 weeks, (3) follow-up 1–3 months, (4) follow-up 4–6 months, (5) follow-up 7–12 months, and (6) clinical/laboratory follow-up recommendations irrespective of time. We identified 1,650 recommendations (1,650/20,000 = 8.25 %). Using a one-to-one logistic regression analysis, the following factors were significant (P < 0.05) when evaluating noncompliance: increasing age, no primary care physician, lack of insurance, primary language other than English, increased distance from hospital, and extended follow-up interval. Noncompliance with recommended additional imaging (RAI) is multifactorial. Primary and/or referring physicians should take notice of the aforementioned compliance trends and mitigating factors, adopt systematic safety measures and create interdepartmental dialogue with radiology to ensure compliance, and counsel and educate patients about the importance of imaging recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gordon RW, Anderson SW, Ozonoff A, Rekhi S, Soto JA (2013) Blunt pancreatic trauma: evaluation with MDCT technology. Emerg Radiol 20(4):259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Plurad DS, Bricker S, Van Natta TL, Neville A, Kim D, Bongard F, Putnam B (2013) Penetrating cardiac injury and the significance of chest computed tomography findings. Emerg Radiol 20(4):279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tempany CM, McNeil BJ (2001) Advances in biomedical imaging. JAMA 285(5):562–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho CY, Hussain S, Alam T, Ahmad I, Wu IC, O'Neill DP (2013) Accuracy of CT cerebral perfusion in predicting infarct in the emergency department: lesion characterization on CT perfusion based on commercially available software. Emerg Radiol 20(3):203–212

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Chakraborty DP, McNulty JP, Manning DJ, Thomas EM, Brennan PC (2010) Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):469–474

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arenson RL (2009) Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: radiologists’ self-referral or good clinical practice? Radiology 253(2):291–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boland GW, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS (2010) Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shuaib W, Johnson JO, Pande V, Salastekar N, Kang J, He Q, Khosa F (2014) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction: cumulative effect of cost, radiation, and turnaround time on the patient and the health care system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(1):13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shuaib W, Vijayasarathi A, Tiwana MH, Johnson JO, Maddu KK, Khosa F (2013) The diagnostic utility of rib series in assessing rib fractures. Emergency radiology.

  10. DeFlorio R, Coughlin B, Coughlin R, Li H, Santoro J, Akey B, Favreau M (2008) Process modification and emergency department radiology service. Emerg Radiol 15(6):405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slovis TL (2008) The art of communication: strategies to improve patient and information flow : radiology perspective. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 4):S651–S654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisinger F, Moatti JP, Béja V, Obadia Y, Alias F, Dressen C (1994) Attitude of the French female population to cancer screening. Bull Cancer 81(8):683–690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP (2000) Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist. Am J Public Health 90(5):799–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lagerlund M, Sparén P, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M (2000) Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme; socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev 9(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B (2000) Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 13(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108(5):754–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khosa F, Krinsky G, Macari M, Yucel EK, Berland LL (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 2: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on vascular findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(10):789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khosa F, Romney BP, Costa DN, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ (2011) Prevalence of noncardiac findings on clinical cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W380–W386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khosa F, Warraich H, Khan A, Mahmood F, Markson L, Clouse ME, Manning WJ (2012) Prevalence of non-cardiac pathology on clinical transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(5):553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waqas S, Johnson J-O, Salastekar N, Maddu KK, Khosa F (2013) Incidental findings detected on abdomino-pelvic multidetector computed tomography performed in the acute setting. The American journal of emergency medicine

  21. Swinker M, Arbogast JG, Murray S (1993) Why do patients decline screening mammography? Fam Pract Res J 13(2):165–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beaulieu MD, Béland F, Roy D, Falardeau M, Hébert G (1996) Factors determining compliance with screening mammography. CMAJ 154(9):1335–1343

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP, Weilburg JB, Boland GW, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH (2009) Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 253(2):453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. London S. American College of Emergency Physicians. Treat ED overcrowding by speeding admissions. (2010). http://www.acep.org/MobileArticle.aspx?id=72995&coll_id=693&parentid=740. Accessed 27 Nov 2013

  25. Field DL, Hedges JR, Arnold KJ, Goldstein-Wayne B, Rouan GW (1988) Limitations of chest pain follow-up from an urban teaching hospital emergency department. J Emerg Med 6(5):363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lerman B, Kobernick MS (1987) Return visits to the emergency department. J Emerg Med 5(5):359–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Straus JH, Orr ST, Charney E (1983) Referrals from an emergency room to primary care practices at an urban hospital. Am J Public Health 73(1):57–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Magnusson AR, Hedges JR, Vanko M, McCarten K, Moorhead JC (1993) Follow-up compliance after emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 22(3):560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dorey F, Amstutz HC (1989) The validity of survivorship analysis in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(4):544–548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ (1997) Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(2):254–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shuaib W, Tiwana MH (2013) Interdepartmental communication. Ir J Med Sci.

  32. Blane CE, Pinsky RW, Joe AI, Pichan AE, Blajan MR, Helvie MA (2007) Costs of achieving high patient compliance after recall from screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4):894–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Waqas Shuaib, Arvind Vijayasarathi, Jamlik-Omari Johnson, Ninad Salastekar, Kiran Kumar Maddu & Faisal Khosa

  2. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Ninad Salastekar & Qing He

Authors
  1. Waqas Shuaib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arvind Vijayasarathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jamlik-Omari Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ninad Salastekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qing He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kiran Kumar Maddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Faisal Khosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waqas Shuaib.

Additional information

Faisal Khosa is an American Roentgen Ray scholar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuaib, W., Vijayasarathi, A., Johnson, JO. et al. Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports. Emerg Radiol 21, 373–379 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1209-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1209-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation