Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spiral head CT in the evaluation of acute intracranial pathology: a pictorial essay

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review the benefits of spiral head computed tomography (CT) with routine multiplanar reformations in the evaluation of acute intracranial pathology. This technique is particularly useful in trauma patients for detection of skull base or calvarial fractures, thin tentorial subdural hematomas, or for more specific characterization of intracranial hemorrhage. The benefits of multiplanar reformations have been described for a variety of other diagnoses in the chest, abdomen, extremities, and spine, and their routine use continues to grow with the widespread availability of multi-slice CT scanners. In this article, we describe spiral head CT technique with multiplanar reformations as an alternative to the routinely used sequential technique. Subtle findings and lesions aligned predominantly in the axial plane can often be visualized to better advantage with multiplanar reformations. We also address technical factors for optimizing spiral technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM (2000) Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 343:100–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM et al (2004) Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med (43 Suppl):28–60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aschoff AJ (2006) MDCT of the abdomen. Eur Radiol 16(Suppl 7):M54–M57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanucci E, Fiaschetti V, Rotili A, Floris R, Simonetti G (2007) Whole body 16-row multislice CT in emergency room: effects of different protocols on scanning time, image quality and radiation exposure. Emerg Radiol 13:251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, Adamson AR, DeLong DM, Paulson EK (2006) Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT. Radiology 238:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayashankar A, Udayasankar U, Sebastian S, Lee EK, Kalra M, Small W (2008) MDCT of thoraco-abdominal trauma: an evaluation of the success and limitations of primary interpretation using multiplanar reformatted images vs axial images. Emerg Radiol 15:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W (2008) Identification of the normal appendix in healthy adults by 64-slice MDCT: the value of adding coronal reformation images. Br J Radiol 81:859–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut JW, Hochberg AR, Varghese JC, Soto JA (2005) Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma using PACS-based 2D and 3D MDCT reformations of the lumbar spine and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1435–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganagthan K (2007) Imaging hemidiaphragmatic injury. Eur Radiol 17:1411–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Acute abdomen: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acad Radiol 14:19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sliker CW (2008) Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: imaging with multidetector CT angiography. Radiographics 28:1689–1708, discussion 1709–1610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernalsteen D, Cosnard G, Robert A, Grandin C, Vlassenbroek A, Duprez T (2007) Suitability of helical multislice acquisition technique for routine unenhanced brain CT: an image quality study using a 16-row detector configuration. Eur Radiol 17:975–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ptak T, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (2003) Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience. Radiology 229:902–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei SC, Ulmer S, Lev MH, Pomerantz SR, Gonzalez RG, Henson JW (2010) Value of coronal reformations in the CT evaluation of acute head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:334–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zacharia TT, Nguyen DT (2009) Subtle pathology detection with multidetector row coronal and sagittal CT reformations in acute head trauma. Emerg Radiol 17:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Depreitere B, Van Lierde C, Sloten JV et al (2006) Mechanics of acute subdural hematomas resulting from bridging vein rupture. J Neurosurg 104:950–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Servadei F, Murray GD, Teasdale GM et al (2002) Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: demographic and clinical study of 750 patients from the European brain injury consortium survey of head injuries. Neurosurgery 50:261–267, discussion 267–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gentry LR (1994) Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology 191:1–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattioli C, Beretta L, Gerevini S et al (2003) Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage on the computerized tomography scan obtained at admission: a multicenter assessment of the accuracy of diagnosis and the potential impact on patient outcome. J Neurosurg 98:37–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Strub WM, Leach JL, Tomsick T, Vagal A (2007) Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1679–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laine FJ, Shedden AI, Dunn MM, Ghatak NR (1995) Acquired intracranial herniations: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:967–973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. New PF, Aronow S, Hesselink JR (1980) National Cancer Institute study: evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial neoplasms. IV. Meningiomas. Radiology 136:665–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smirniotopoulos JG, Murphy FM, Rushing EJ, Rees JH, Schroeder JW (2007) Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 27:525–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hofman PA, Nelemans P, Kemerink GJ, Wilmink JT (2000) Value of radiological diagnosis of skull fracture in the management of mild head injury: meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:416–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner BG, Rhea JT, Thrall JH, Small AB, Novelline RA (2004) Trends in the use of CT and radiography in the evaluation of facial trauma, 1992–2002: implications for current costs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:751–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Sodickson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sodickson, A., Okanobo, H. & Ledbetter, S. Spiral head CT in the evaluation of acute intracranial pathology: a pictorial essay. Emerg Radiol 18, 81–91 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0914-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0914-7

Keywords

Navigation