Skip to main content
Log in

Waiting to exhale: salvaging the nondiagnostic CT pulmonary angiogram by using expiratory imaging to improve contrast dynamics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We attempted to investigate whether computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the expiratory phase can improve contrast enhancement of the pulmonary arteries and mitigate the effect of inspiratory transient attenuation artifact, potentially salvaging nondiagnostic studies. Eighteen patients with indeterminate inspiratory CTPA, despite proper contrast bolus were studied. Patients were rescanned in expiration using the same contrast bolus and scanning parameters. The attenuation of each pulmonary arterial segment, superior and inferior vena cava, and atria and ventricles during the two phases of respiration was measured independently by three radiologists. All pulmonary segments were evaluated for filling defects during the two phases. In addition, the studies were graded for diagnostic quality of enhancement and probable impact on management. A statistically significant increase in pulmonary arterial enhancement was seen during expiration from the pulmonary trunk to the segmental pulmonary arteries (P < 0.001) and for the inferior vena cava, the right atrium, and the ventricle. The incidence of nondiagnostic inspiratory studies ranged from 89 to 100%, depending on the observer. All studies were upgraded to fully acceptable diagnostic quality with follow-up expiratory imaging (P < 0.0001). Expiratory phase imaging was observed to have diagnostic impact in 78 to 88% of cases, with overall good to moderate interobserver agreement. In one case, pulmonary embolism was detected on the expiratory scan, which was not seen on the inspiratory scan. Expiratory imaging for nondiagnostic CTPA improves pulmonary arterial enhancement and improves diagnostic quality of CTPA by eliminating transient attenuation artifact, thus facilitating more accurate diagnosis and providing earlier treatment of pulmonary embolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wittram C, Maher MM, Yoo AJ, Kalra MK, Shepard JO, McLoud TC (2004) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic criteria and causes of misdiagnosis. RadioGraphics 24:1219–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE (2004) Trends in the use of diagnostic imaging in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 93:1316–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR (1999) Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology 210:693–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryu JH, Olson EJ, Patricia P (1998) Clinical recognition of pulmonary embolism: problem of unrecognized and asymptomatic cases. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 9:873–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henk CB, Grampp S, Linnau KF et al (2003) Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep inspiration CT angiography—influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial-septal defect. Radiology 226:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosselin MV, Rassner UA, Thieszen SL, Phillips J, Oki A (2004) Contrast dynamics during CT pulmonary angiogram: analysis of an inspiration associated artifact. J Thorac Imaging 19:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J (1999) Spiral CT angiography of the pulmonary circulation. Radiology 212:615–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Remy-Jardin Remy MJ, Remy J, Artaud, Fribourg M, Beregi JP (1998) Spiral CT of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic approach interpretive pitfalls and current indications. Eur Radiol 8:1376–1390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 233:817–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227:809–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hennekens CH, Buring JE (1987) Epidemiology in medicine. Little Brown, Boston, MA, pp 246–248

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement: statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 212–236

    Google Scholar 

  13. Testa AC, Mansueto D, Lorusso D et al (2004) Angiographic power 3-D quantitative analysis in gynecologic solid tumors. J Ultrasound Med 23:821–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. V, Boiselle PM (2001) Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiogram: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 221:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I et al (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636 333999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wittram C, Maher MM, Yoo AJ et al (2004) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic criteria and causes of misdiagnosis. RadioGraphics 24:1219–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takata M, Rototham JL (1992) Effects of inspiratory diaphragmatic descent on inferior vena caval venous return. J Appl Physiol 72:597–607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Langlotz CP, Ramchandani P (1999) Assessment of a bolus-tracking technique in helical renal CT to optimize nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 211:87–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones SE, Wittram C (2005) The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology 237(1):329–337, October 1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didlier D et al (2001) Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 135:88–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B (1995) Untreated patients with pulmonary embolism. Outcome, clinical and laboratory assessment. Chest 107:931–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrit DW, Jordan SC (1960) Anticoagulation drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a controlled trial. Lancet 1:1309–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Herman RE, Davis JH, Holden WD (1961) Pulmonary embolism: a clinical and pathologic study with emphasis on the effect of prophylactic therapy and anticoagulants. Am J Surg 102:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A et al (1992) The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 326:1240–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brunot S, Corneloup O, Latrabe V et al (2005) Reproducibility. of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 15(10):2057–2063, Oct

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Remy-Jardin Pistolesi M, Goodman LR et al (2007) Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology [cited October 3, 2007] Available from http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2452070397v1

  28. Goodman LR (2005) Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know? Radiology 234:654–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L (2005) Clinicians’ response to radiologists’ reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:623–628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC et al (2007) Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(4):544–549, July/August

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tublin ME, Murphy ME, Tessler FN (1998) Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy. AJR 171:933–939

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S (2004) Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR 183:1673–1689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinodkumar Velayudhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y.H., Velayudhan, V., Weltman, D.I. et al. Waiting to exhale: salvaging the nondiagnostic CT pulmonary angiogram by using expiratory imaging to improve contrast dynamics. Emerg Radiol 15, 161–169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0695-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0695-9

Keywords

Navigation