Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibacterial photodynamic activity of photosensitizer-embedded alginate-pectin-carboxymethyl cellulose composite biopolymer films

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) is a promising approach for treatment of wounds infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In this approach, delivery of appropriate concentration of photosensitizer (PS) at the infected site is a critical step; it is therefore essential that PS need to be administered at the infected site in a suitable formulation. Here, we report preparation of PS-embedded composite biopolymer films and their photobactericidal properties against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and biocompatibility. Sodium alginate (SA), pectin (PC), and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) were used for preparing films containing chlorin p6 (Cp6, anionic PS) or methylene blue (MB, cationic PS). Films containing 1% CMC (15 mm diameter; 110 ± 09 μm thickness) showed ~ 55% light transmission in 500 to 750 nm region and high swelling rate as indicated by ~ 38% increase in diameter within 1 h. Absorption spectroscopic studies of PS-embedded films revealed that while Cp6 existed mainly in monomeric state, MB existed in both dimeric and monomeric forms. MRSA incubated with the film for 1 h displayed substantial uptake of Cp6 and MB as indicated by the presence of Cp6 fluorescence and MB staining in cells under the microscope. Furthermore, photodynamic treatment (660 nm, 10 J/cm2) of MRSA with Cp6 embedded in film or free Cp6 resulted in ~ 3 log reduction in colony-forming units (cfu), whereas decrease in cfu was less (~ 1 log) for MB-embedded film than for free MB (~ 6 logs). Studies on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells showed that there was no significant change in the viability of cells when they were incubated with solubilized films (plain) for 24 h or subjected to treatment with PS-containing films followed by PDT. These results suggest that films are biocompatible and have potential application in photodynamic treatment of MRSA-infected wounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morley S, Griffiths J, Philips G, Moseley H, O’Grady C, Mellish K, Lankester CL, Faris B, Young RJ, Brown SB, Rhodes LE (2013) Phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled study of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in bacterially colonized, chronic leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers: a new approach to antimicrobial therapy. Br J Dermatol 168(3):617–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lei X, Liu B, Huang Z, Wu J (2015) A clinical study of photodynamic therapy for chronic skin ulcers in lower limbs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Dermatol Res 307(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamblin MR (2016) Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation: a bright new technique to kill resistant microbes. Curr Opin Microbiol 33:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartolomeu M, Rocha S, Cunha Â, Neves MG, Faustino MA, Almeida A (2016) Effect of photodynamic therapy on the virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 7:267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassidy CM, Tunney MM, McCarron PA, Donnelly RF (2009) Drug delivery strategies for photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy: from bench top to clinical practice. J Photochem Photobiol B 95(2):71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donnelly RF, Cassidy CM, Loughlin RG, Brown A, Tunney MM, Jenkins MG, McCarron PA (2009) Delivery of methylene blue and meso-tetra (N-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphine tetra tosylate from cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: a potential means of photodynamic therapy of infected wounds. J Photochem Photobiol B 96 (3):223-231.

  7. Pelras T, Glass S, Scherzer T, Elsner C, Schulze A, Abel B (2017) Transparent low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate-based hydrogels as film media for photoswitchable drugs. Polymers (Basel) 9(12):639.

  8. El-Khordagui L, El-Sayed N, Galal S, El-Gowelli H, Omar H, Mohamed M (2017) Photosensitizer-eluting nanofibers for enhanced photodynamic therapy of wounds: a preclinical study in immunocompromized rats. Int J Pharm 520(1-2):139–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rezvanian M, Amin MCIM, Ng SF (2016) Development and physicochemical characterization of alginate composite film loaded with simvastatin as a potential wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym 137:295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang D, Jones KS (2009) Effect of alginate on innate immune activation of macrophages. J Biomed Mater Res A 90(2):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL (2014) Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 3(8):511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Munarin F, Tanzi MC, Petrini P (2012) Advances in biomedical applications of pectin gels. Int J Biol Macromol 51(4):681–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ludwig A (2005) The use of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57(11):1595–1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramli NA, Wong TW (2011) Sodium carboxymethylcellulose scaffolds and their physicochemical effects on partial thickness wound healing. Int J Pharm 403(1-2):73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong TW, Ramli NA (2014) Carboxymethylcellulose film for bacterial wound infection control and healing. Carbohydr Polym 112:367–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoober JK, Sery TW, Yamamoto N (1988) Photodynamic sensitizers from chlorophyll: purpurin-18 and chlorin p6. Photochem Photobiol 48(5):579–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma M, Dube A, Bansal H, Kumar Gupta P (2004) Effect of pH on uptake and photodynamic action of chlorin p6 on human colon and breast adenocarcinoma cell lines. Photochem Photobiol Sci 3(2):231–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahu K, Sharma M, Bansal H, Dube A, Gupta PK (2013) Topical photodynamic treatment with poly-L-lysine-chlorin p6 conjugate improves wound healing by reducing hyperinflammatory response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected wounds of mice. Lasers Med Sci 28(2):465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Auffret AD, Humphrey MJ, Eccleston GM (2005) Lyophilised wafers as a drug delivery system for wound healing containing methylcellulose as a viscosity modifier. Int J Pharm 289(1-2):51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65(1-2):55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Martău GA, Mihai M, Vodnar DC (2019) The use of chitosan, alginate, and pectin in the biomedical and food sector-biocompatibility, bioadhesiveness, and biodegradability. Polymers (Basel) 11(11):1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Yasushi H (2012) Methylene blue-induced stabilization effect of adsorbed glucose oxidase on a carbon-felt surface for bioelectrocatalytic activity. J Electrochem Soc 159(5):F110–F118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Seely GR, Knotts RR (1983) Binding of methylene blue to alginate: effect of acid treatment on metachromasy. Carbohydr Polym 3(2):109–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Momoh FU, Boateng JS, Richardson SC, Chowdhry BZ, Mitchell JC (2015) Development and functional characterization of alginate dressing as potential protein delivery system for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 81:137–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jannesari M, Varshosaz J, Morshed M, Zamani M (2011) Composite poly (vinyl alcohol)/poly (vinyl acetate) electrospun nanofibrous mats as a novel wound dressing matrix for controlled release of drugs. Int J Nanomedicine 6:993–1003

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wanga Q, Hub X, Dua Y, Kennedy JF (2010) Alginate/starch blend fibers and their properties for drug controlled release. Carbohydr Polym 82:842–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pereda M, Ponce AG, Marcovich NE, Ruseckaite RA, Martucci JF (2011) Chitosan–gelatin composites and bi-layer films with potential antimicrobial activity. Food Hydrocoll 25(5):1372–1381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rezvanian M, Ahmad N, Mohd Amin MC, Ng SF (2017) Optimization, characterization, and in vitro assessment of alginate-pectin ionic cross-linked hydrogel film for wound dressing applications. Int J Biol Macromol 97:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka M, Kinoshita M, Yoshihara Y, Shinomiya N, Seki S, Nemoto K, Hirayama T, Dai T, Huang L, Hamblin MR, Morimoto Y (2012) Optimal photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy of infections should kill bacteria but spare neutrophils. Photochem Photobiol 88(1):227–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Briggs T, Blunn G, Hislop S, Ramalhete R, Bagley C, McKenna D, Coathup M (2018) Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy-a promising treatment for prosthetic joint infections. Lasers Med Sci 33(3):523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez JM, Bilgin MD, Grossweiner LI (1997) Singlet oxygen generation by photodynamic agents. J Photochem Photobiol B 37:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nyman ES, Hynninen PH (2004) Research advances in the use of tetrapyrrolic photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B 73(1-2):1–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. ISO. (2009) Biological evaluation of medical devices, Part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. In ISO 10993-5. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

  34. Demidova TN, Hamblin MR (2004) Photodynamic therapy targeted to pathogens. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 17(3):245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Yeahwant Deshpande for providing technical help in preparing biopolymer films and members of Mechanical Components Design and Fabrication Lab, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore for helping in measuring thickness of biopolymer films.

Funding

This work was supported by Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinalini Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All cells used in experiments were of commercial sources, MRSA (ATCC 43300) and Human Keratinocytes (HaCaT, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India). Hence, ethical approval was not needed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, M., Dube, A. & Majumder, S.K. Antibacterial photodynamic activity of photosensitizer-embedded alginate-pectin-carboxymethyl cellulose composite biopolymer films. Lasers Med Sci 36, 763–772 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03083-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03083-2

Keywords

Navigation