Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the prevalence, clinical features, and risk factors of dentin hypersensitivity in a selected Brazilian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence, clinical features, and risk factors of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in a Brazilian population.

Materials and methods

300 patients at the Dentistry Clinic of the University of São Paulo participated in this study. The subjects completed a questionnaire regarding their personal information, the presence of DH, and some of its risk factors. Following completion of the questionnaire, a clinical examination was undertaken. To confirm the presence of DH, the subjects were evaluated with the use of a probe and cold air from a triple syringe. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test and odds ratio, with the critical level p <0.05.

Results

The prevalence of DH was 46 %. Females presented a higher prevalence than males (p <0.05). The left posterior region was affected by DH the most (maxilla = 41 % and mandible = 36 %). Cold was reported as the most common pain-inducing stimulus (88 %). The pain was described as “discomfort” by 51 % of the subjects with DH. Toothbrushing four times a day (p <0.05), toothbrushing with excessive force (p <0.05), bruxism (p <0.05), and gastroesophageal reflux (p <0.05) were strongly correlated with DH.

Conclusions

The prevalence of DH was particularly high. The risk factors for DH were gender (female), toothbrushing four times a day, toothbrushing with excessive force, bruxism, and gastroesophageal reflux.

Clinical relevance

DH was a common finding in this population suggesting that preventive measures considering its risk factors must be implemented in order to reduce or control the symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L (2002) Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 133:725–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S (2004) Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: a new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 135:1109–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 22:195–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity (2003) Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 69(4):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rees JS, Addy M (2004) A cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in UK general dental practice and a summary review of prevalence studies. Int J Dent Hyg 2:64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orchardson R, Collins WJ (1987) Clinical features of hypersensitive teeth. Br Dent J 162:253–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rees JS (2000) The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol 27:860–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rees JS, Addy M (2002) A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 29:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN (1996) Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol 23:989–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillam DG, Seo HS, Newman HN, Bulman JS (2001) Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations. J Oral Rehabil 28:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clayton DR, McCarthy D, Gillam DG (2002) A study of the prevalence and distribution of dentine sensitivity in a population of 17–58-year-old serving personnel on an RAF base in the Midlands. J Oral Rehabil 29:14–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bamise CT, Kolawole KA, Oloyede EO, Esan TA (2010) Tooth sensitivity experience among residential university students. Int J Dent Hyg 8:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer C, Fischer RG, Wennberg A (1992) Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent 20:272–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu HC, Lan WH, Hsieh CC (1998) Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Taipei, Taiwan. J Endod 24:45–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taani SD, Awartani F (2002) Clinical evaluation of cervical dentin sensitivity (CDS) in patients attending general dental clinics (GDC) and periodontal specialty clinics (PSC). J Clin Periodontol 29:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D (2010) A multi-centre and cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. J Clin Periodontol 37:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye W, Feng XP, Li R (2012) The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in Chinese adults. J Oral Rehabil 39:182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Colak H, Demirer S, Hamidi M, Uzgur R, Koseoglu S (2012) Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a dental hospital clinic in Turkey. West Indian Med J 61:174–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cavadini C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM (2000) US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. West J Med 173:378–383

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG (1997) Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 24:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark GE, Troullos ES (1990) Designing hypersensitivity clinical studies. Dent Clin N Am 34:531–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gillam DG, Aris A, Bulman JS, Newman HN, Ley F (2002) Dentine hypersensitivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials: clinical evaluation, prevalence and intra-oral distribution. J Oral Rehabil 29:226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naing LWT, Rusli BN (2006) Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofac Sci 1:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taani DQ, Awartani F (2001) Prevalence and distribution of dentin hypersensitivity and plaque in a dental hospital population. Quintessence Int 32:372–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Addy M, Mostafa P, Newcombe RG (1987) Dentine hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque. J Dent 15:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buckley LA (1981) The relationships between malocclusion, gingival inflammation, plaque and calculus. J Periodontol 52:35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. West N, Addy M, Hughes J (1998) Dentine hypersensitivity: the effects of brushing desensitizing toothpastes, their solid and liquid phases, and detergents on dentine and acrylic: studies in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 25:885–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D (2010) Dentine hypersensitivity—Australian dentists’ perspective. Aust Dent J 55:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brannstrom M (1986) The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod 12:453–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matthews B, Vongsavan N (1994) Interactions between neural and hydrodynamic mechanisms in dentine and pulp. Arch Oral Biol 39(Suppl):87S–95S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D (1987) Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol 14:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, Schafer R, Singh P, Franz M, Raab WH (2007) In vivo evaluation of noncarious cervical lesions in sleep bruxism subjects. J Prosthet Dent 98:150–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, Ganss C (2011) Dental erosion—an overview with emphasis on chemical and histopathological aspects. Caries Res 45(Suppl 1):2–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seong J, Macdonald E, Newcombe RG, Davies M, Jones SB, Johnson S, West NX (2013) In situ randomised trial to investigate the occluding properties of two desensitising toothpastes on dentine after subsequent acid challenge. Clin Oral Investig 17:195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naylor F, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P, Arana-Chavez VE, Sobral MA (2006) Micromorphological analysis of dentinal structure after irradiation with Nd: YAG laser and immersion in acidic beverages. Photomed Laser Surg 24:745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taís Scaramucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scaramucci, T., de Almeida Anfe, T.E., da Silva Ferreira, S. et al. Investigation of the prevalence, clinical features, and risk factors of dentin hypersensitivity in a selected Brazilian population. Clin Oral Invest 18, 651–657 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1008-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1008-1

Keywords

Navigation