Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endovenous laser with miniphlebectomy for treatment of varicose veins and effect of different levels of laser energy on recanalization. A single center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Varicose veins, associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, are traditionally treated with conventional surgery. In recent years, minimally invasive alternatives to surgical treatment such as the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation have been developed with promising results. Residual varicose veins following EVLA, regress untouched, or phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy can be concomitantly performed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of EVLA with different levels of laser energy in patients with varicose veins secondary to saphenous vein reflux. From February 2006 to August 2011, 740 EVLA, usually with concomitant miniphlebectomies, were performed in 552 patients. A total of 665 GSV, 53 small saphenous veins (SSV), and 22 both GSV and SSV were treated with EVLA under duplex USG. At 84 patients, bilateral intervention is made. In addition, miniphlebectomy was performed in 540 patients. A duplex ultrasound (US) is performed to patients preoccupying chronic venous insufficiency (with visible varicose veins, ankle edema, skin changes, or ulcer). Saphenous vein incompetence was diagnosed with saphenofemoral, saphenopopliteal, or truncal vein reflux in response to manual compression and release with patient standing. The procedures were performed under local anesthesia with light sedation or spinal anesthesia. Endovenous 980-nm diode laser source was used at a continuous mode. The mean energy applied per length of GSV during the treatment was 77.5 ± 17.0 J (range 60–100 J/cm). An US evaluation was performed at first week of the procedure. Follow-up evaluation and duplex US scanning were performed at 1 and 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years to assess treatment efficacy and adverse reactions. Average follow-up period was 32 ± 4 months (3–55 months). There were one patient with infection and two patients with thrombus extension into the femoral vein after EVLA. Overall occlusion rate was 95 %. No post-procedural deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred. Laser energy, less than 80 J/cm, was significantly associated with increased recanalization of saphenous vein, among the other energy levels. EVLA seems a good alternative to surgery by the application of energy of not less than 80 J/cm. It is both safe and effective. It is a well-tolerated procedure with rare and relatively minor complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caggiati A, Allegra C (2007) Historical introduction. In: Bergan JJ (ed) The vein book. Elsevier Academic Pres, Oxford, pp 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergan JJ, Kumins NH, Owens EL, Sparks SR (2002) Surgical and endovascular treatment of lower extremity venous insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans C, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ (1999) Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:149–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarro L, Min RJ, Boné C (2001) Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins—preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 27:117–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M et al (2007) Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg 46:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stirling M, Shortell CK (2006) Endovascular treatment of varicose veins. Semin Vasc Surg 19:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desmyttere J, Grard C, Mordon S (2005) A 2 years follow-up study of endovenous 980 nm laser treatment of the great saphenous vein: role of the blood content in the GSV. Med Laser Appl 20:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmedt CG, Sroka R, Steckmeier S et al (2006) Investigation on radiofrequency and laser (980 nm) effects after endoluminal treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency in an ex vivo model. Eur J Vasc Surg 32:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Satokawa H, Yokoyama H, Wakamatsu H et al (2010) Comparison of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins with high ligation using pulse mode and without high ligation using continuous mode and lower energy. Ann Vasc Dis 3(1):46–51

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmet SE (2007) Endovenous laser ablation. Phlebolymphology 14:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss RA (2001) Endovenous techniques for elimination of saphenous reflux: a valuable treatment modality. Dermatol Surg 27:902–905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bone C (1999) Tratamiento endoluminal de las varices conlaser de Diodo. Estudio preliminary. Rev Patol Vasc 5:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  13. Proebstle TM, Krummenauer F, Gul D, Knop J (2004) Nonocclusion and early reopening of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment is fluence dependent. Dermatol Surg 30:174–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Timperman PE, Sichlau M, Ryu RK (2004) Greater energy delivery improves treatment success of endovenous laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1061–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agus GB, Mancini S, Magi G (2006) The first 1000 cases of Italian Endovenous-laser Working Group (IEWG). Rationale, and long-term outcomes for the 1999–2003 period. Int Angiol 25:209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vuylsteke ME, Vandekerckhove PJ, De Bo TH, Moons P, Mordon S (2010) Use of a new endovenous laser device: results of the 1500-nm laser. Ann Vasc Surg 24:205–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz T et al (2010) Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins with the 1470-nm diode laser. J Vasc Surg 51:1474–1478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fan CM, Rox-Anderson R (2008) Endovenous laser ablation: mechanism of action. Phlebology 23:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalra M, Gloviczki P (2008) Endovenous ablation of the saphenous vein. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 20:371–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kontothanassis D, Di Mitri R, Ferrari Ruffino S, Zambrini E, Camporese G, Gerard JL, Labropoulos N (2009) Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 49:973–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marston WA, Brabham VW, Mendes R, Berndt D, Weiner M, Keagy B (2008) The importance of deep venous reflux velocity as a determinant of outcome in patients with combined superficial and deep venous reflux treated with endovenous saphenous ablation. J Vasc Surg 48:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández CF, Roizental M, Carvallo J (2008) Combined endovenous laser therapy and microphlebectomy in the treatment of varicose veins: efficacy and complications of a large single-center experience. J Vasc Surg 48:947–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perkowski P, Ravi R, Gowda RC, Olsen D, Ramaiah V, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Diethrich EB (2004) Endovenous laser ablation of the saphenous vein for treatment of venous insufficiency and varicose veins: early results from a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 11:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mozes G, Kalra M, Carmo M, Swenson L, Gloviczki P (2005) Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 41:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Theivacumar NS, Dellagarammaticas D, Beale R, Mavor A, Gough M (2006) The clinical significance of persistent below-knee great saphenous vein (BK-GSV) reflux following endovenous GSV laser ablation (EVLA): do we need to modify treatment? Phlebology 93:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schanzer H (2010) Endovenous ablation plus microphlebectomy/sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins: single or two-stage procedure? Vasc Endovasc Surg 44:545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Monahan DL (2005) Can phlebectomy be deferred in the treatment of varicose veins? J Vasc Surg 42:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Hatfield J, Chetter IC (2009) Randomized clinical trial of concomitant or sequential phlebectomy after endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. Br J Surg 96(4):369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Surgery, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    Ilhan Golbasi, Cengiz Turkay, Ozan Erbasan, Cemal Kemaloğlu & Ömer Bayezid

  2. Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    Suat Sanli

  3. Public Health, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    Mehtap Turkay

Authors
  1. Ilhan Golbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cengiz Turkay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ozan Erbasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cemal Kemaloğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suat Sanli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mehtap Turkay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ömer Bayezid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilhan Golbasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golbasi, I., Turkay, C., Erbasan, O. et al. Endovenous laser with miniphlebectomy for treatment of varicose veins and effect of different levels of laser energy on recanalization. A single center experience. Lasers Med Sci 30, 103–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1626-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1626-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation