Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation: no value in short-term duplex ultrasound follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Endogenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a proven treatment for varicose veins that has equal efficacy to surgical stripping. It offers the benefit of reduced post operative pain and wound infection and quicker return to work.

Aim

To carry out a clinical audit of patients undergoing RFA to monitor outcomes, complication rates, follow-up sclerotherapy and to assess the need for post-operative duplex scan.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of 174 procedures carried out from January 2011 to March 2012. Patients were pre-assessed with history, physical exam and duplex ultrasound. They were followed up at 3 months with same. CEAP classification was applied to check for post-operative improvement.

Results

174 procedures, including 165 great saphenous vein and 9 short saphenous vein ablations were carried out on 154 patients. The duplex occlusion rate at 3 months was 99 %. 141 patients (81 %) showed a reduction in CEAP score with average CEAP decreasing from 2.37 to 0.96. Overall the complication rate was low at 7 %. Paraesthesia was the most common complication with 7 cases (4 %). There were no DVTs. 45.4 % of patients went on to have follow-up sclerotherapy for venous flares.

Conclusion

RFA is a safe and effective treatment for varicose veins. There is no benefit in performing routine short term follow-up duplex scan due to the high occlusion rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roth SM (2007) Endovenous radiofrequencey ablation of superficial and perforator veins. Surg Clin North Am 87:1267–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Golan JF, Glenn DM (2008) Laser and radiofrequency endovenous ablation of venous reflux. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 20(1):75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 98:1079–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shepherd AC, Gohel MS, Brown LC, Metcalfe MJ, Hamish M, Davies AH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Br J Surg 97:810–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FAK, Samuel N, Hatfield J, Chetter IC (2011) Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 98:501–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesbitt C, Eifell R, Coyne P, Badri H, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G (2011) Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) 10:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS (2001) Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 35:1190–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caggiati A et al (2005) Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limb: extensions, refinements, and clinical application. J Vasc Surg 41(4):719–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Proebstle TM, Alm J, Göckeritz O, Wenzel C, Noppeney T, Lebard C, Pichot O, Sessa C, Creton D, European Closure Fast Clinical Study Group (2011) Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 54:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolini P; Closure Group (2005) Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenous obliteration with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn CW, Kabnick LS, Merchant RF, Owens R, Weiss RA (2006) Endovascular radiofrequency obliteration using 90 degrees C for treatment of great saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg 20:625–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vasquez MA, Wang J, Mahathanaruk M, Buczkowski G, Sprehe E, Dosluoglu HH (2007) The utility of the venous clinical severity score in 682 limbs treated by radiofrequency saphenous vein ablation. J Vasc Surg 45:1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuniga JM, Hingorani A, Ascher E, Shiferson A, Jung D, Jimenez R et al (2012) Short-term outcome analysis of radiofrequency ablation using ClosurePlus vs ClosureFast catheters in the treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 55:1048–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bisang U, Meier TO, Enzler M, Thalhammer C, Husmann M, Amann-Vesti BR (2012) Results of endovenous ClosureFast treatment for varicose veins in an outpatient setting. Phlebology 27:118–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi JH, Park HC, Joh JH (2013) The occlusion rate and patterns of saphenous vein after radiofrequency ablation. J Korean Surg Soc 84:107–113

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C, Proebstle TM, ClosureFast Europe Group (2010) Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 24:360–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Braithwaite B, Hnatek L, Zierau U, Camci M, Akkersdijk G, Nio D, Sarlija M, Ajduk M, Santoro P, Roche E (2013) Radiofrequency-induced thermal therapy: results of a European multicentre study of resistive ablation of incompetent truncal varicose veins. Phlebology 28:38–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malgor RD, Labropoulos N (2012) Diagnosis and follow-up of varicose veins with duplex ultrasound: how and why? Phlebology 27(Suppl 1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hingorani AP, Ascher E, Markevich N, Schutzer RW, Kallakuri S, Hou A, Nahata S, Yorkovich W, Jacob T (2004) Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 40:500–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Subramonia S, Lees T (2010) Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 97:328–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan Y, Zhao J, Mei J, Shao M, Zhang J (2014) Comparison of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation and stripping for varicose vein treatment: a meta-analysis. Phlebology 29(2):109–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mozes G, Kalra M, Carmo M, Swenson L, Gloviczki P (2005) Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 41:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haqqani OP, Vasiliu C, O’Donnell TF, Iafrati MD (2011) Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Surg 54:10S–17S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J, Gockeritz O, Lebard C, Pichot O (2008) Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 47:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marsh P, Price BA, Holdstock JM, Harrison C, Whiteley MS (2010) Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:521–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldman MP, Weiss R, Gradman W (2005) Deep vein thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 41:737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    M. Broe, F. M. Shaikh & A. Leahy

  2. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

    M. Broe, F. M. Shaikh & A. Leahy

Authors
  1. M. Broe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. M. Shaikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Leahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Broe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Broe, M., Shaikh, F.M. & Leahy, A. Endovenous radiofrequency ablation: no value in short-term duplex ultrasound follow-up. Ir J Med Sci 184, 641–645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1194-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation