Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microleakage of Er:YAG laser and diamond bur on different bonding systems in class V restorations. Class V cavities were prepared with Er:YAG laser or diamond bur on 80 intact human molars. Teeth were randomly distributed into ten groups and cavities were restored with CeramX duo (DENTSPLY) or Filtek Silorane (3M/ESPE) using different bonding materials (One Coat 7.0 (Coltène), XP Bond (DENTSPLY), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray), AdperSE (3M/ESPE), and Silorane System Adhesive (3M/ESPE). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling and load cycling. After being immersed in silver nitrate dye, the specimens were sectioned. Microleakage was evaluated by stereomicroscope and SEM. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann–Whitney tests. Statistically differences were found between groups (p > 0.05) and cavities prepared with the Er:YAG laser showed higher microleakage than diamond bur. The microleakage of different bonding systems was influenced by the choice of diamond bur or Er:YAG laser for class V composite cavity preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hosoda H, Fusayama T (1984) A tooth substance saving restorative technique. Int Dent J 34:1–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Corona SAM, Borsatto MC, Dıbb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A Jr, Pé Cora JD (2001) Microleakage on class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 26:491–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corona SAM, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De Sá Rocha RAS, Ramos TS, Palma-Dıbb RG (2003) Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 30:1008–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun J, Fang R, Lin N, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S (2009) Nondestructive quantification of leakage at the tooth-composite interface and its correlation with material performance parameters. Biomaterials 30:4457–4462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeiger DN, Sun J, Schumacher GE, Lin-Gibson S (2009) Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater 25:1213–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sehy C, Drummond JL (2004) Micro-cracking of tooth structure. Am J Dent 17:378–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R (2005) Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 21:68–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Weinmann W (2004) The induction of gene mutations and micronuclei by oxiranes and siloranes in mammalian cells in vitro. J Dent Res 83:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Nathwani H, Burke FJT, Randall RC (2005) In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 21:324–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Filtek™ Silorane (2007) Technical Profile. 3M ESPE

  11. Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Palma Dıbb RG, Ramos RP, Pecora JD (2001) Microleakage of a resin sealant after acid-etching, Er:YAG laser irradiation and air-abrasion of pits and fissures. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:83–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW (2001) Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er:YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater J 17:340–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moldes VL, Capp CL, Navarro RS, Matos AB, Youssef MN, Cassoni A (2009) In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 11:221–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelagalli J, Gimbel CB, Hansen RT, Swett A, Winn DW (1997) Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser versus dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation – phase I. J Clin Laser Med Surg 15:109–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roebuck EM, Saunders WP, Whitters CJ (2000) Influence of three erbium:YAG laser energies on the in vitro microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 13:280–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, CdeP E (2005) Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 37:172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E (2009) Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 27:783–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palma Dibb RG, Corona SAM, Borsatto MC, Ferreira KC, Ramos RP, Pecora JD (2002) Assessing microleakage on class V composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schein MT, Bocangel JS, Nogueira GEC, Schein PA (2003) SEM evaluation of the interaction pattern between dentin and resin after cavity preparation using Er:YAG laser. J Dent 31:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self etching systems. I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osorio R, Toledano M, de Leonardi G, Tay F (2003) Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self-etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 66:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Araujo RM, Eduardo CP, Duarte Junior SL, Araujo MA, Loffredo LC (2001) Microleakage and nanoleakage: influence of laser in cavity preparation and dentin pretreatment. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:325–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77:1404–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9:338–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 9:345–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wigdor HA, Walsh JT, Featherstone JDB, Visuri SR, Fried D, Waldvogel JL (1995) Lasers in dentistry. Lasers Surg Med 16:103–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahillo JG, Pinon MR, Nogueira JR, Biedma BM, Patino PV, Munoz FM, Varela MB, Castro NB (2002) A comparative study of microleakage through enamel and cementum after laser Er:YAG instrumentation in class V cavity obturations, using scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20:197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bertrand MF, Semez G, Leforestier E, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP (2006) Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 38:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG (2004) Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 29:430–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E (2010) Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur. Lasers Med Sci 25:493–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Bicer OC, Firatli E (2008) Microleakage of class V cavities with different adhesive systems prepared by a diamond instrument and different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg 26:585–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Turkun M (2007) Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation. Gen Dent 55:27–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Groth EB, Mercer CE, Anderson P (2001) Microtomographic analysis of subsurface enamel and dentine following Er:YAG laser and acid etching. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 9:73–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brulat N, Rocca JP, Leforestier E, Fiorucci G, Nammour S, Bertrand MF (2009) Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to Er:YAG-laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 24(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Nonaka T, Pecora JD, Palma Dibb RG (2002) Effect of Er:YAG laser on bond strength to dentin of a self-etching primer and two single-bottle adhesive systems. Lasers Surg Med 3:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2002) Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Investig 3:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PN, Powers JM (2004) Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an erbium:YAG laser. Am J Dent 17:331–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bouillaguet S, Gamba J, Forchelet J, Krejci I, Wataha JC (2006) Dynamics of composite polymerization mediated the development of cuspal strain. Dent Mater 22(10):896–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater 26:215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Imazato S, Tay FR, Kaneshiro AV, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S (2007) An in vivo evaluation of bonding ability of comprehensive antibacterial adhesive system incorporating MDPB. Dent Mater 23:170–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ulker M, Ozcan M, Sengün A, Ozer F, Belli S (2010) Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self-etching adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 93:175–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Siso HS, Kustarci A, Göktolga EG (2009) Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre-treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond. Oper Dent 34:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Batu Can Yaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaman, B.C., Guray, B.E., Dorter, C. et al. Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems. Lasers Med Sci 27, 785–794 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0981-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0981-3

Keywords

Navigation