Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Glory and misery of biochar

  • Review
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochar refers to carbon-based dusty residues obtained from biomass pyrolysis. This recently rediscovered traditional soil improver is currently being glorified for its wide portfolio of favorable environmental aspects. With its lifetime of several centuries, it is being widely accepted as a promising method of carbon sequestration. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that biochar can reduce bioavailability of some heavy metals and that it has a high adsorption capacity to persistent organic pollutants. These effects are explained by a complex of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms. Besides agriculture, it has been currently used in food and chemical industries, as well as in the building industry. Many other promising applications are under investigation. However, contrary to many enthusiastic proclamations, no revolution in agriculture or environmental management is taking place. Despite significant achievements in reduction of biochar production costs, high demand from the industry and energy sector keeps the biochar price still high, which prevents a return of the ancient farming practice on a commercial scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ameloot N, Graber ER, Verheijen FG, De Neve S (2013) Interactions between biochar stability and soil organisms: review and research needs. Eur J Soil Sci 64:379–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azargohar R, Dalai AK (2008) Steam and KOH activation of biochar: experimental and modeling studies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 110:413–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Smith JL, Bolton H (2011) Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biol Biochem 43:296–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borchard N, Wolf A, Laabs V, Aeckersberg R, Scherer HW, Moeller A, Amelung W (2012) Physical activation of biochar and its meaning for soil fertility and nutrient leaching—a greenhouse experiment. Soil Use Manag 28:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Harris W (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresour Technol 101:5222–5228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Assessing the agronomic values of contrasting char materials on Australian hardsetting soil. In: Proceedings of the conference of the international agrichar initiative, Terrigal, NSW, Australia

  • Chen B, Chen Z (2009) Sorption of naphthalene and 1–naphthol by biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures. Chemosphere 76:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42:5137–5143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Chen G, Chen L, Chen Y, Lehmann J, McBride MB, Hay AG (2011) Adsorption of copper and zinc by biochars produced from pyrolysis of hardwood and corn straw in aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 102:8877–8884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Liu Y-X, Wu W-X, Shi D-Z, Yang M, Zhong Z-K (2010) Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 213:47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gai X, Wang H, Liu J, Zhai L, Liu S, Ren T, Liu H (2014) Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS ONE 9:e113888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hašková S (2016) Holistic Assessment and Ethical Disputation on a New Trend in Solid Biofuels. Sci Eng Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9790-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manag 92:223–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman AR, Pullammanappallil P, Cao X (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass. Bioresour Technol 110:50–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Van Der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta–analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang TY, Jiang J, Xu RK, Li Z (2012) Adsorption of Pb (II) on variable charge soils amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Chemosphere 89:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin H (2010) Characterization of microbial life colonizing biochar and biochar-amended soils. Dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University

  • Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph S, Lehmann J (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, GB

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph SD et al (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Res 48:501–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kammann CI, Schmidt HP, Messerschmidt N, Linsel S, Steffens D, Müller C, Kyoro H-W, Conte P, Joseph S (2015) Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co-composted biochar. Sci Rep 5:11080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura R, Nishio M (1989) Contribution of soil microorganisms to utilization of insoluble soil phosphorus by plants in grasslands. In: Third grassland ecology conference, Czechoslovakia, pp 10–17

  • Krull ES, Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2004) Functions of soil organic matter and the effect on soil properties. In: Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting. CSIRO Land & Water, Glen Osmond

  • Laird DA (2008) The charcoal vision: a win–win–win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Fairhead J, Fraser J (2012) Green grabs and biochar: revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy. J Peasant Stud 39:285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007a) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007b) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mardoyan A, Braun P (2015) Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. Int J Green Energy 12:405–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2013) Use of continuous pressure shockwaves apparatus in rapeseed oil processing. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:721–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2014a) Economically oriented process optimization in waste management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:7400–7402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2014b) Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1821–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolář L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Vaníčková R (2015a) Managerial preferences in relation to financial indicators regarding the mitigation of global change. Sci Eng Ethics 21:203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Žák J, Vaníčková R, Maroušková A, Váchal J, Myšková K (2015b) Techno-economic assessment of processing the cellulose casings waste. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:2441–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Žák J, Vaníčková R, Maroušková A, Váchal J, Myšková K (2016) Polemics on ethical aspects in the compost business. Sci Eng Ethics 22:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušková A, Braun P (2014) Holistic approach to improve the energy utilization of Jatropha curcas L. Rev Téc Ing Univ Zulia 37:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarl BA, Peacocke C, Chrisman R, Kung CC, Sands RD (2009) Economics of biochar production, utilization and greenhouse gas offsets. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, Washington D.C, pp 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta K, Matsumoto T, Hatate Y, Nishihara K, Nakanishi T (2004) Removal of nitrate–nitrogen from drinking water using bamboo powder charcoal. Bioresour Technol 95:255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa M, Okimori Y (2010) Pioneering works in biochar research, Japan. Soil Res 48:489–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan N, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T (2011) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348:439–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul EA (2014) Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry, vol 4. Academic press, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovic LR, Moreno-Castilla C, Rivera-Utrilla J (2001) Carbon materials as adsorbents in aqueous solutions. Chem Phys Carbon 27:227–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes AH, Carlin A, Semple KT (2008) Impact of black carbon in the extraction and mineralization of phenanthrene in soil. Environ Sci Technol 42:740–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio–char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavich PG, Sinclair K, Morris SG, Kimber SW, Downie A, Van Zwieten L (2013) Contrasting effects of manure and green waste biochars on the properties of an acidic ferralsol and productivity of a subtropical pasture. Plant Soil 366:213–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smetanová A, Dotterweich M, Diehl D, Ulrich U, Dotterweich NF (2013) Influence of biochar and terra preta substrates on wettability and erodibility of soils. Z Geomorphol Supp 57:111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R (2009) Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO Land Water Sci Rep 5:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohi SP, Krull Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2010) Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant Soil 333:443–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo JLV, Blum WE, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thies JE, Rillig MC (2009) Characteristics of biochar: biological properties. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 86–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng RL, Tsen SK (2006) Characterization and use of high surface area activated carbons prepared from cane pith for liquid–phase adsorption. J Hazard Mater 136:671–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uchimiya M, Wartelle LH, Klasson KT, Fortier CA, Lima IM (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. J Agric Food Chem 59:2501–2510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanholme B, Desmet T, Ronsse F, Rabaey K, Van Breusegem F, De Mey M, Soetaert W, Boerjan W (2013) Towards a carbon–negative sustainable bio–based economy. Front Plant Sci 4:174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, Van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams MM, Arnott JC (2010) A comparison of variable economic costs associated with two proposed biochar application methods. Ann Environ Sci 4:23–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Sun J, Shao H, Chang SX (2014) Biochar had effects on phosphorus sorption and desorption in three soils with differing acidity. Ecol Eng 62:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Inyang M, Zhang M, Zimmerman AR, Ro KS (2012) Hydrogen peroxide modification enhances the ability of biochar (hydrochar) produced from hydrothermal carbonization of peanut hull to remove aqueous heavy metals: batch and column tests. Chem Eng J 200:673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Sheng G (2003) Enhanced pesticide sorption by soils containing particulate matter from crop residue burns. Environ Sci Technol 37:3635–3639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Cao X, Mašek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory–produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1295–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the support provided by the Quality Innovation of the Year 2014 award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Institute of Technology and Businesses in České Budějovice, Okružní 517/10, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic

    Josef Maroušek, Marek Vochozka, Jan Plachý & Jaroslav Žák

Authors
  1. Josef Maroušek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Vochozka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Plachý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jaroslav Žák
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Maroušek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maroušek, J., Vochozka, M., Plachý, J. et al. Glory and misery of biochar. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19, 311–317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1284-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1284-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation