Skip to main content
Log in

Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advantages of biochar application in crop production, water treatment and more are well known; however, the manufacturing cost (roughly 500USD t−1) prevents its expansion into the commercial scale. The very first apparatus which continuously produces the biochar from the fermentation residue by utilizing waste heat from the cogeneration unit linked to the biogas station was designed and analyzed. The manifestations of the pyrolysis retention time and the operating temperature were studied in detail. The results supported by corresponding financial analysis show that the biochar obtained had sufficient quality, and the concept may be economically viable once the cost may be negligible in a long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenerg 5:202–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busch D, Kammann C, Grünhage L, Müller C (2012) Simple biotoxicity tests for evaluation of carbonaceous soil additives: establishment and reproducibility of four test procedures. J Environ Qual 41:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri D, Rombolà AG, Torri C, Spokas KA (2013) Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar and biochar amended soil. J Anal Appl Pyrol 103:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, Zimmerman AR, Bachmann RT, Shitumbanuma V, O’Toole A, Sundqvist KL, Arp HP, Cornelissen G (2012) Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ Sci Technol 46:2830–2838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hašková S, Kolář P (2010) A contribution to a mathematic modeling of the behavior of private and institutionalized investors as observed in practice. 28th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics: 214–219

  • Hašková S, Kolář P (2011) The mathematic modeling of process economization of natural resources. 29th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics: 224–229

  • Hašková S, Kolář P (2012). Determination of mutually acceptable price of used manufacturing equipment. 30th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics: 266–271

  • Hašková S, Kolář P (2013) The Limits of Relativism in Managerial Thinking. 31th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics: 153–161

  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Ruan D, Tolga E (2002) Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows. Inf Sci 142:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehres B, Th elen-Jüngling M, Bidlingmaier W, Meyer-Spasche H, Fischer P, Philipp W, Marciniszyn E, Schneichel H-W, Severin K, Müller M (2006) Methodenbuch zur Analyse organischer Düngemittel, Bodenverbesserungsmittel und Substrate. (Method handbook for analysis of organic fertilizers, soil ameliorants and substrates.). BundesgütegemeinschaftKompost e.V, Köln-Gremberghoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolář L, Kužel S, Peterka J, Štindl P, Plát V (2008) Agrochemical value of the organic matter of fermenter wastes in biogas production. Plant Soil Environ 54:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalenko G (2001) Assessment of Leco CNS-2000 analyzer for simultaneously measuring total carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan 32:2065–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici M-M, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich K-H (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XY, Zhang AF, Ji CY, Joseph S, Bian RJ, Li LQ, Pan GX, Paz-Ferreiro J (2013) Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions: a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil 373:583–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marlier E, Natali D, Van Dam R (2010) Europe 2020, towards a more social EU? Series: Travail & Société/Work & Society. Peter Lang, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J (2013) Prospects in straw disintegration for biogas production. Environ Sci Pollut R 20:7268–7274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolar L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (1981) Analysis of performance-degradation data. IEEE Trans Reliab 2:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Watts DW (2013) Augmenting soil water storage using uncharred switchgrass and pyrolyzed biochars. Soil Use Manag 29:98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley S, Sohi S (eds) (2010) An assessment of the benefits and issues associated with the application of biochar to soil. A report commissioned by the United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and Department of Energy and Climate Change. UK Biochar Research Centre, Edinburgh

  • Smetanová A, Dotterweich M, Diehl D, Ulrich U, Fohrer N (2013) Influence of biochar and terra preta substrates on wettability and erodibility of soils. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 57:111–134 Supplementary Issues

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O: C molar ratios. Carbon Manag 1:289–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccari FP, Baronti S, Lugato E, Genesio L, Castaldi S, Fornasier F, Miglietta F (2011) Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. Eur J Agron 34:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Maroušek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maroušek, J. Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 1821–1825 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0730-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0730-y

Keywords

Navigation