Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The genotypic study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex resistant to isoniazid: Galicia, Spain (2008–2013)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incorporation of rapid detection systems to identify mutations in M. tuberculosis complex that confer resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin has potentiated the knowledge of their distribution, given the geographical variability. We performed antibiograms of the 2,993 strains isolated in Galicia, Spain (2008–2013). In the strains resistant to isoniazid, a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL and MTBDRplus Genotype test (Hain Lifescience, Germany) were used. We found that 3.64 % of strains were resistant to isoniazid, while 0.43 % were resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin (multidrug resistant, MDR). The MTBDRplus test showed an overall sensitivity of 72.48 %, with 62.5 % sensitivity for non MDR isoniazid-resistant strains and 100 % sensitivity for MDR strains. The katG gene mutation was detected at codon 315 in 38.53 % of strains. The S315T mutation appeared in 61.54 % of MDR strains and 34.38 % of non-MDR strains. The 28.44 % had mutations in inhA, (93.55 % in C15T), and 38.46 % of MDR strains were mutated. In non-MDR strains, 37.50 % were wild-type, 35.42 % and 27.08 % had mutations in katG and inhA, respectively. The most frequent mutation in rpoβ was S531L (46.15 %). The 38.71 % and 41.9 % of strains with resistance to isoniazid and streptomycin had mutations in katG and inhA, respectively (2 strains with mutations in T8C and T8A). The distribution pattern of resistance among strains with high and low concentrations of isoniazid showed statistically significant differences in relation to the mutation in katG and wild-type. The sensitivity of the Genotype MTBDRplus test for non-MDR strains in our area was at the lower threshold described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO (2015) Global tuberculosis report 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 25 July 2016

  2. Horsburgh CR, Barry CE, Lange C (2015) Treatment of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med Massachusetts Med Soc 373(22):2149–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sloan DJ, Lewis JM (2016) Management of multidrug-resistant TB: novel treatments and their expansion to low resource settings. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 110(3):163–72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Programa Galego de Prevención e Control da Tuberculose (2003) Documentos Técnicos en Saúde Pública: Serie B. In: de Galicia X (ed) Consellería de Sanidade e Servicios Sociais. N°. 35. Dirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz-Ferro E, Ursúa-Díaz MI, Taboada-Rodríguez JA, Hervada-Vidal X, Anibarro L, Túñez V et al (2014) Epidemiology of tuberculosis in Galicia, Spain, 16 years after the launch of the Galician tuberculosis programme. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 18(2):134–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (2004) Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world. Report no.3. The WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance 1999-2002. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1-129. ISBN 92 4 156285-4

  7. World Health Organization (2008) Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the World. Report no.4. The WHO /IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance 2002-2007. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, WHO/HTM/2008.394

  8. Huyen Mai NT, Cobelens FGJ, Buu TN, Lan NTN, Dung NH, Kremer K et al (2013) Epidemiology of isoniazid resistance mutations and their effect on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(8):3620–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Musser JM, Kapur V, Williams DL, Kreiswirth BN, van Soolingen D, van Embden JD (1996) Characterization of the catalase-peroxidase gene (katG) and inhA locus in isoniazid-resistant and -susceptible strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by automated DNA sequencing: restricted array of mutations associated with drug resistance. J Infect Dis 173:196–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mokrousov I, Narvskaya O, Otten T, Limeschenko E, Steklova L, Vyshnevskiy B (2002) High prevalence of KatG Ser315Thr substitution among isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from northwestern Russia, 1996 to 2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1417–1424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnard M, Albert H, Coetzee G, O’Brien R, Bosman ME (2008) Rapid molecular screening for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-volume public health laboratory in South Africa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:787–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cambau E, Viveiros M, Machado D, Raskine L, Ritter C, Tortoli E et al (2015) Revisiting susceptibility testing in MDR-TB by a standardized quantitative phenotypic assessment in a European multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:686–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikam C, Patel R, Sadani M, Ajbani K, Kazi M, Soman R et al (2016) Redefining MTBDRplus test results: what do indeterminate results actually mean? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 20(2):154–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans J, Stead MC, Nicol MP, Segal H (2009) Rapid genotypic assays to identify drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 63(1):11–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Torres JN, Paul LV, Rodwell TC, Victor TC, Amallraja AM, Elghraoui A et al (2015) Novel katG mutations causing isoniazid resistance in clinical M. tuberculosis isolates. Emerg Microbes Infect 4:e42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell PJ, Morlock GP, Sikes RD, Dalton TL, Metchock B, Starks AM et al (2011) Molecular detection of mutations associated with first- and second-line drug resistance compared with conventional drug susceptibility testing of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55(5):2032–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller B, Streicher EM, Hoek KGP, Tait M, Trollip A, Bosman ME et al (2011) inh A promoter mutations: a gateway to extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 15(3):344–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brossier F, Veziris N, Truffot-Pernot C, Jarlier V, Sougakoff W (2011) Molecular investigation of resistance to the antituberculous drug ethionamide in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55(1):355–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vilchèze C, Jacobs WR (2014) Resistance to Isoniazid and ethionamide in mycobacterium tuberculosis: genes, mutations, and causalities. Microbiol Spectr 2(4)

  20. Chryssanthou E, Ängeby K (2012) The GenoType® MTBDRplus assay for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sweden. APMIS 120(5):405–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillemann D, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Richter E (2007) Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 45(8):2635–2640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen KA, Bishai WR, Pym AS (2014) Molecular basis of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr 2(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Da Silva PEA, Palomino JC (2011) Molecular basis and mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Classical and new drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother 66(7):1417–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hazbón MH, Brimacombe M, Bobadilla del Valle M, Cavatore M, Guerrero MI, Varma-Basil M et al (2006) Population genetics study of isoniazid resistance mutations and evolution of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(8):2640–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Barbeito-Castiñeiras.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Economic funding was not received.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Isolates were obtained as part of the routine activity of the GMRL and were analysed anonymously in a retrospective manner. Ethical approval and informed consent were, thus, not required.

Appendix: Galician M. tuberculosis Resistance Group

Appendix: Galician M. tuberculosis Resistance Group

Microbiology Department, Hospital Comarcal de Monforte de Lemos:

Pedro Alonso

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario de Lugo:

Pilar Alonso

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña:

Ana Fernández

Microbiology Department, Hospital Comarcal de O Barco de Valdeorras:

María de los Ángeles Gómez-Rial

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo:

Gema González-Mediero

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol:

Susana Méndez-Lage

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra:

María Ángeles Pallarés-González

Microbiology Department, Hospital da Costa Burela:

Elizabeth Prieto

Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense:

Patricia Romero Jung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez del Molino, M.L., Barbeito-Castiñeiras, G., Mejuto, B. et al. The genotypic study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex resistant to isoniazid: Galicia, Spain (2008–2013). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 1795–1801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2730-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2730-9

Keywords

Navigation