Skip to main content
Log in

Cortical and spinal excitability changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined to physiotherapy in stroke spastic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been used to treat post-stroke upper limb spasticity (ULS) in addition to physiotherapy (PT). To determine whether rTMS associated with PT modulates cortical and spinal cord excitability as well as decreases ULS of post-stroke patients.

Methods

Twenty chronic patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group-1 Hz rTMS on the unaffected hemisphere and PT, or control group-sham stimulation and PT, for ten sessions. Before and after sessions, ULS was measured using the modified Ashworth scale and cortical excitability using the output intensity of the magnetic stimulator (MSO). The spinal excitability was measured by the Hmax/Mmax ratio of the median nerve at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at the 4-week follow-up.

Results

The experimental group showed at the end of treatment an enhancement of cortical excitability, i.e., lower values of MSO, compared to control group (p = 0.044) and to baseline (p = 0.028). The experimental group showed a decreased spinal cord excitability at the 4-week follow-up compared to control group (p = 0.021). ULS decreased by the sixth session in the experimental group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

One-hertz rTMS associated with PT increased the unaffected hemisphere excitability, decreased spinal excitability, and reduced post-stroke ULS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

rTMS:

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

ULS:

upper limb spasticity

PT:

physical therapy

MSO:

magnetic stimulator output

CT:

computed tomography

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

MAS:

modified ashworth scale

MEP:

motor-evoked potential

MT:

motor threshold

EMG:

electromyography

H-reflex:

Hoffmann reflex

Hmax:

maximum amplitude of the H-wave

Mmax:

maximum amplitude of the M-wave

FDI:

first dorsal interosseous

RCT:

randomized clinical trial

SPSS:

statistical package for social sciences

References

  1. Harris JE, Eng JJ (2007) Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther 87(1):88–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cousins E, Ward AB, Roffe C, Rimington LD, Pandyan AD (2009) Quantitative measurement of poststroke spasticity and response to treatment with botulinum toxin: a 2-patient case report. Phys Ther 89(7):688–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke D, Wissel J, Donnan GA (2013) Pathophysiology of spasticity in stroke. Neurology 80(3 Supplement 2):S20–S26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes MP, Johnson GR (2008) Upper motor neurone syndrome and spasticity: clinical management and neurophysiology. Cambridge University Press

  5. Gracies JM (2005) Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. II: emergence of muscle overactivity. Muscle Nerve 31(5):552–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Priori AF, Cogiamanian F, Mrakic-Sposta S (2006) Pathophysiology of spasticity. Neurol Sci 27(4):307–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Valero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A (2005) Impact of TMS on the primary motor cortex and associated spinal systems. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 24(1):29–35

  8. Valle AC, Dionisio K, Pitskel NB, Pascual-Leone A, Orsati F, Ferreira MJ, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Fregni F (2007) Low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity. Dev Med Child Neurol 49(7):534–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein EM (2001) Spasticity management: an overview. J Child Neurol 16(1):16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FAS V (1997) Alterações Centrais e Periféricas Após Lesão do Sistema Nervoso Central. Considerações e Implicações para a Fisioterapia. Braz J Phys Ther 2(1):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif LA, El-Nazer R, Williams J, Banco E, Macea DD, Tesio L, Chessa C (2011) Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(9):819–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, Momosaki R, Yokoi A, Fukuda A, Ito H, Tominaga A, Umemori T, Kameda Y (2011) Anti-spastic effect of low-frequency rTMS applied with occupational therapy in post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Brain Inj 25(5):496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galvão SCB, dos Santos RBC, dos Santos PB, Cabral ME, Monte-Silva K (2014) Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(2):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Etoh S, Noma T, Ikeda K, Jonoshita Y, Ogata A, Matsumoto S, Shimodozono M, Kawahira K (2013) Effects of repetitive trascranial magnetic stimulation on repetitive facilitation exercises of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 45(9):843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rose DK, Patten C, McGuirk TE, Lu X, Triggs WJ (2014) Does inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augment functional task practice to improve arm recovery in chronic stroke? Stroke Res Treat 2014:305236

  16. Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, Olyaei G, Jalaei S, Forogh B, Najari H (2016) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 38(19):1918–1926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Rastgoo M, Forogh B, Jalaie S, Olyaei G (2015) A pilot study on the effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor neuron excitability in patients after stroke. J Bodyw Mov Ther 19(4):616–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeuchi N, Izumi S-I (2012) Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast 2012(2012):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Smith MB, Horton MG (1987) Relationship between static muscle strength deficits and spasticity in stroke patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 67(7):1068–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brucki SM, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH (2003) Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 61:777–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakheit A, Maynard V, Curnow J, Hudson N, Kodapala S (2003) The relation between Ashworth scale scores and the excitability of the α motor neurones in patients with post-stroke muscle spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(5):646–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinelli P, Di Lorenzo G (1989) Electromyographic assessment of spasticity. In: Electromyographic assessment of spasticity. Springer

  23. Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Hoffman MA (2004) The Hoffmann reflex: methodologic considerations and applications for use in sports medicine and athletic training research. J Athl Train 39, 268(3)

  24. Charalambous CP (2014) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. In: Classic papers in orthopaedics. Springer, pp 415–417

  25. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J (2004) The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil 18(8):833–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K (2005) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 36(12):2681–2686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou Q, Tao HW, Poo MM (2003) Reversal and stabilization of synaptic modifications in a developing visual system. Science 300(5627):1953–1957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu L, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ (1998) Spatial exploration induces a persistent reversal of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus. 394(6696):891

  29. Manahan-Vaughan D, Braunewell KH (1999) Novelty acquisition is associated with induction of hippocampal long-term depresssion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(15):8739–8744

  30. Fricke K, Seeber AA, Thirugnanasambandam N, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Rothwell JC (2011) Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 105(3):1141–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cosentino G, Fierro B, Paladino P, Talamanca S, Vigneri S, Palermo A, Giglia G, Brighina F (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation preconditioning modulates the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 35(1):119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang Y-Z, Rothwell JC, Edwards MJ, Chen R-S (2008) Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cereb Cortex 18(3):563–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bütefisch C (2006) Neurobiological bases of rehabilitation. Neurol Sci 27(1):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Riecker A, Gröschel K, Ackermann H, Schnaudigel S, Kassubek J, Kastrup A (2010) The role of the unaffected hemisphere in motor recovery after stroke. Hum Brain Mapp 31(7):1017–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schaechter JD, Perdue KL, Wang R (2008) Structural damage to the corticospinal tract correlates with bilateral sensorimotor cortex reorganization in stroke patients. Neuroimage 39(3):1370–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, Hoppe J, Plewnia C, Gerloff C (2006) The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci 26(22):6096–6102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F et al (2014) Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabuilitation. Nat Rev Neurol 10(10):597–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gunduz A, Kumru H, Pascual-Leone A (2014) Outcomes in spasticity after repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulations. Neural Regen Res 9, 712(7)

  39. Mukherjee A, Chakravarty A (2010) Spasticity mechanisms–for the clinician. Front Neurol 1

  40. Levin MF, Hui-Chan C (1993) Are H and stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity? J Neurol 240(2):63–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

KMS is supported by CNPQ-Brazil (grant number 308291/2015-8) and the research was supported by grant (number APQ-0357-4.08/13) from Fundação de Amparo a Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE)-Recife-Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kátia Monte-Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

dos Santos, R.B.C., Galvão, S.C.B., Frederico, L.M.P. et al. Cortical and spinal excitability changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined to physiotherapy in stroke spastic patients. Neurol Sci 40, 1199–1207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03765-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03765-y

Keywords

Navigation