Skip to main content
Log in

Muscle elastography: a new imaging technique for multiple sclerosis spasticity measurement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity is currently evaluated on the basis of neurological examinations such as Ashworth Scale (AS) and 0–10 NRS. Severity of spasticity is difficult to quantify. We investigated the use of real time elastography (RTHE) ultrasounds for evaluating objectively the muscle fibers status in MS spasticity patients and their changes after a new antispasticity treatment. Two studies were performed. In study A, 110 MS patients underwent a neurological evaluation based on the AS and RTHE. The RTHE images were scored with the new 1-5 muscle fibers rigidity imaging scale, here called MEMSs (Muscle Elastography Multiple Sclerosis Score). The correlation between AS and MEMSs was found to be statistically significant. In study B, 55 MS patients treated with THC:CBD oromucosal spray for their resistant spasticity were followed prospectively. MS spasticity was evaluated by the 0–10 NRS scale at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. MEMSs’ figures were obtained at both timepoints. Responders to THC:CBD oromucosal spray (pre-defined as an improvement ≥20% in their 0–10 NRS spasticity score vs. baseline) were 65% of sample. These patients had a mean 0-10 NRS reduction of 1.87 and a MEMSs reduction of 1.97 (P values <0.0001). The remaining 35% of patients, classified as clinically non-responders, showed still a significant mean reduction in MEMSs (0.8, P = 0.002). Our overall results showed that RTHE, operativized throughout MEMSs, could be an objective gold standard to evaluate MS muscle spasticity as well as the effectiveness of antispasticity therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ (1990) “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:231–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tristam M, Barbosa DC, Cosgrove DO, Nassiri DK, Bamber JC, Hill CR (1986) Ultrasonic study of in vivo kinetic characteristics of human tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 12:927–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tristam M, Barbosa DC, Cosgrove DO, Bamber JC, Hill CR (1988) Application of Fourier analysis to clinical study of patterns of tissue movement. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:695–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levinson SF, Shinagawa M, Sato T (1995) Sonoelastic determination of human skeletal muscle elasticity. J Biomech 28:1145–1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garra BS (2007) Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 23:255–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garra BS (2011) Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 27:177–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, Pinggera G, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Aigner F, Lorenz A, Pedross F, Frauscher F (2007) Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 100:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2009) Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol 64:1196–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR (2010) Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14:323–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Snedeker JG (2011) Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons. Skeletal Radiol 40:389–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lalitha P, Reddy MCh, Reddy KJ (2011) Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol 12:365–375

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Park GY, Kwon DR (2011) Application of real-time sonoelastography in musculoskeletal diseases related to physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:875–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Botar-Jid C, Damian L, Dudea SM, Vasilescu D, Rednic S, Badea R (2010) The contribution of ultrasonography and sonoelastography in assessment of myositis. Med Ultrason 12:120–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and real-time ultrasound elastography of the thigh muscles in congenital muscle dystrophy. Skeletal Radiol 39:391–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arroyo R, Vila C, Clissold S (2011) Retrospective observational study of the management of multiple sclerosis patients with resistant spasticity in Spain: the ‘5E’ study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizzo MA, Hadjimichael OC, Preiningerova J, Vollmer TL (2004) Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 10:589–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnes MP, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, Hermens H, Johnson GR (2005) Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 27:2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balantrapu S, Sosnoff JJ, Pula JH, Sandroff BM, Motl RW (2014) Leg spasticity and ambulation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2014:649390. doi:10.1155/2014/649390

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzo MA, Hadjimichael OC, Preiningerova J, Vollmer TL (2004) Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 10:589–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Othbi N, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Jamshidpour B, Amiri S (2009) Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth scale in assessing lower limb muscle spasticity. Brain Inj 23:815–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haas J (2011) Pathophysiology. Assessment and management of multiple sclerosis spasticity: an update. Expert Rev Neurother 11:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Farrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP (2008) Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther 30:974–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Collin C, Ehler E, Waberzinek G, Alsindi Z, Davies P, Powell K, Notcutt W, O’Leary C, Ratcliffe S, Nováková I, Zapletalova O, Piková J, Ambler Z (2010) A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of Sativex, in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res 32:451–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Novotna A, Mares J, Ratcliffe S, Novakova I, Vachova M, Zapletalova O, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, Cefaro L, Comi G, Rossi P, Ambler Z, Stelmasiak Z, Erdmann A, Montalban X, Klimek A, Davies Sativex Spasticity Study Group (2011) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, enriched-design study of nabiximols* (Sativex(®)), as add-on therapy, in subjects with refractory spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 18:1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arroyo R, Massana M, Vila C (2013) Correlation between spasticity and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the CANDLE study. Int J Neurosc 123:850–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Henze T, Mackensen S, von Lehrieder G, Zettl U, Pfiffner C, Flachenecker P (2014) Linguistic and psychometric validation of the MSSS-88 questionnaire for patients with multiple sclerosis and spasticity in Germany. Health Qual Life Outcomes

  29. Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P (2007) Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2917–2922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Carlos Vila Silván, Almirall S.A, (Barcelona, Spain) for helpful external review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Illomei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Illomei, G., Spinicci, G., Locci, E. et al. Muscle elastography: a new imaging technique for multiple sclerosis spasticity measurement. Neurol Sci 38, 433–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2780-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2780-x

Keywords

Navigation