Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity is currently evaluated on the basis of neurological examinations such as Ashworth Scale (AS) and 0–10 NRS. Severity of spasticity is difficult to quantify. We investigated the use of real time elastography (RTHE) ultrasounds for evaluating objectively the muscle fibers status in MS spasticity patients and their changes after a new antispasticity treatment. Two studies were performed. In study A, 110 MS patients underwent a neurological evaluation based on the AS and RTHE. The RTHE images were scored with the new 1-5 muscle fibers rigidity imaging scale, here called MEMSs (Muscle Elastography Multiple Sclerosis Score). The correlation between AS and MEMSs was found to be statistically significant. In study B, 55 MS patients treated with THC:CBD oromucosal spray for their resistant spasticity were followed prospectively. MS spasticity was evaluated by the 0–10 NRS scale at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. MEMSs’ figures were obtained at both timepoints. Responders to THC:CBD oromucosal spray (pre-defined as an improvement ≥20% in their 0–10 NRS spasticity score vs. baseline) were 65% of sample. These patients had a mean 0-10 NRS reduction of 1.87 and a MEMSs reduction of 1.97 (P values <0.0001). The remaining 35% of patients, classified as clinically non-responders, showed still a significant mean reduction in MEMSs (0.8, P = 0.002). Our overall results showed that RTHE, operativized throughout MEMSs, could be an objective gold standard to evaluate MS muscle spasticity as well as the effectiveness of antispasticity therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111–134
Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ (1990) “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:231–239
Tristam M, Barbosa DC, Cosgrove DO, Nassiri DK, Bamber JC, Hill CR (1986) Ultrasonic study of in vivo kinetic characteristics of human tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 12:927–937
Tristam M, Barbosa DC, Cosgrove DO, Bamber JC, Hill CR (1988) Application of Fourier analysis to clinical study of patterns of tissue movement. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:695–707
Levinson SF, Shinagawa M, Sato T (1995) Sonoelastic determination of human skeletal muscle elasticity. J Biomech 28:1145–1154
Garra BS (2007) Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 23:255–268
Garra BS (2011) Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 27:177–186
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350
Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, Pinggera G, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Aigner F, Lorenz A, Pedross F, Frauscher F (2007) Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 100:42–46
Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2009) Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol 64:1196–1202
Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR (2010) Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14:323–333
Li Y, Snedeker JG (2011) Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons. Skeletal Radiol 40:389–397
Lalitha P, Reddy MCh, Reddy KJ (2011) Musculoskeletal applications of elastography: a pictorial essay of our initial experience. Korean J Radiol 12:365–375
Park GY, Kwon DR (2011) Application of real-time sonoelastography in musculoskeletal diseases related to physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:875–886
Botar-Jid C, Damian L, Dudea SM, Vasilescu D, Rednic S, Badea R (2010) The contribution of ultrasonography and sonoelastography in assessment of myositis. Med Ultrason 12:120–126
Drakonaki EE, Allen GM (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and real-time ultrasound elastography of the thigh muscles in congenital muscle dystrophy. Skeletal Radiol 39:391–396
Arroyo R, Vila C, Clissold S (2011) Retrospective observational study of the management of multiple sclerosis patients with resistant spasticity in Spain: the ‘5E’ study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11:205–213
Rizzo MA, Hadjimichael OC, Preiningerova J, Vollmer TL (2004) Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 10:589–595
Barnes MP, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, Hermens H, Johnson GR (2005) Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 27:2–6
Balantrapu S, Sosnoff JJ, Pula JH, Sandroff BM, Motl RW (2014) Leg spasticity and ambulation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2014:649390. doi:10.1155/2014/649390
Rizzo MA, Hadjimichael OC, Preiningerova J, Vollmer TL (2004) Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 10:589–595
Othbi N, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Jamshidpour B, Amiri S (2009) Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth scale in assessing lower limb muscle spasticity. Brain Inj 23:815–819
Haas J (2011) Pathophysiology. Assessment and management of multiple sclerosis spasticity: an update. Expert Rev Neurother 11:3–8
Farrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP (2008) Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther 30:974–985
Collin C, Ehler E, Waberzinek G, Alsindi Z, Davies P, Powell K, Notcutt W, O’Leary C, Ratcliffe S, Nováková I, Zapletalova O, Piková J, Ambler Z (2010) A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of Sativex, in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res 32:451–459
Novotna A, Mares J, Ratcliffe S, Novakova I, Vachova M, Zapletalova O, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, Cefaro L, Comi G, Rossi P, Ambler Z, Stelmasiak Z, Erdmann A, Montalban X, Klimek A, Davies Sativex Spasticity Study Group (2011) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, enriched-design study of nabiximols* (Sativex(®)), as add-on therapy, in subjects with refractory spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 18:1122–1131
Arroyo R, Massana M, Vila C (2013) Correlation between spasticity and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the CANDLE study. Int J Neurosc 123:850–858
Henze T, Mackensen S, von Lehrieder G, Zettl U, Pfiffner C, Flachenecker P (2014) Linguistic and psychometric validation of the MSSS-88 questionnaire for patients with multiple sclerosis and spasticity in Germany. Health Qual Life Outcomes
Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P (2007) Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2917–2922
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Carlos Vila Silván, Almirall S.A, (Barcelona, Spain) for helpful external review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Illomei, G., Spinicci, G., Locci, E. et al. Muscle elastography: a new imaging technique for multiple sclerosis spasticity measurement. Neurol Sci 38, 433–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2780-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2780-x