Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential recall of meaningful and arbitrary sequences by orangutans and human children: Does content matter?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do visual cues such as size, color, and number facilitate sequential recall in orangutans and human children? In Experiment 1, children and adult orangutans solved two types of sequences, arbitrary (unrelated pictures) and meaningful (pictures varied along a spectrum according to the size, color, or number of items shown), in a touchscreen paradigm. It was found that visual cues did not increase the percentage of correct responses for either children or orangutans. In order to demonstrate that the failure to spontaneously seriate along these dimensions was not due to a general inability to perceive the dimensions nor to an inability to seriate items, in Experiment 2, orangutans were trained on one type of sequence and tested on novel sequences organized according to the same rule (i.e., pictures varied on the number spectrum only). The orangutans performed significantly better on novel meaningful sequences in this task than on novel arbitrary sequences. These results indicate that, while orangutans and human children share the ability to learn how to order items according to their size, color, or number, both orangutans and humans lack a cognitive propensity to spontaneously (i.e., without prior training or enculturation) order multiple items by size, color, or number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2014) Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals. J Neurosci Methods 234:82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson US, Cordes S (2013) 1 < 2 and 2 < 3: non-linguistic appreciations of numerical order. Front Psychol 4:1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Maple TL (2007) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young, middle-aged, and older adult orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii and Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 121:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PJ, Mandler JM (1989) One thing follows another; effects of temporal structure on 1- to 2-year-olds’ recall of events. Dev Psychol 25:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanni R, Natoli E, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P (2011) Free-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts. Anim Cogn 14:103–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM (2002) The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition 83:223–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Terrace HS (2000) Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26:31–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Van de Walle GA (2001) The development of ordinal numerical competence in young children. Cogn Psychol 43:53–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Cantlon JF, Terrace HS (2006) The role of reference points in ordinal numerical comparisons by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 32:120–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2007) How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33:32–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantlon JF, Platt ML, Brannon EM (2009) Beyond the number domain. Trends Cogn Sci 13(2):83–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad R (1971) The chronology of the development of covert speech in children. Dev Psychol 5(3):398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi PM (1972) Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. PhD Dissertation, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

  • D’Amato MR, Colombo M (1988) Representation of serial order in monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominy NJ, Lucas PW (2001) Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature 410(6826):363–366. doi:10.1038/35066567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guyla M, Colombo M (2004) The ontogeny of serial-order behavior in humans (Homo sapiens): representation of a list. J Comp Psychol 118:71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris EH, Beran MJ, Washburn DA (2007) Ordinal-list integration for symbolic, arbitrary, and analog stimuli by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Gen Psychol 134:183–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (1952) A behavior system: an introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse SF (2002) Perspectives on comparative cognition: past, present, and future. In: Fountain S (ed) Animal cognition and sequential behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston, pp 3–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue S, Matsuzawa T (2007) Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Curr Biol 17:R1004–R1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs GH, Williams GA (2000) The prevalence of defective color vision in Old World monkeys and apes. Color Res Appl 26S:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas PW, Dominy NJ, Riba-Hernandez P, Stoner KE, Yamashita N, Loria-Calderon E, Petersen-Pereira W, Rojas-Duran Y, Salas-Pena R, Solis-Madrigal S, Osorio D, Darvell BW (2003) Evolution and function of routine trichromatic vision in primates. Evolution 57(11):2636–2643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1933) Comparative behavior of primates. VI. Food preferences of primates. J Comp Psychol 16:187–197. doi:10.1037/h0070404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohshiba N (1997) Memorization of serial items by Japanese monkeys, a chimpanzee, and humans. Jpn Psychol Res 39:236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paz-y-Miño G, Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP (2004) Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 430:778–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfuhl G, Biegler R (2012) Ordinality and novel sequence learning in jackdaws. Anim Cogn 15:833–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, Inhelder B (1964) The early growth of logic in the child. Harper & Row, Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1991) Rules of language. Science 253:530–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1994) The language instinct. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan BC, Julliot C, Simmen B, Vienot F, Charles-Dominique P, Mollon JD (2001) Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1407):229–283. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Remis MJ (2007) Food preferences among captive Western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Int J Primatol 23:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf D, Colombo M (2011) Knowledge of the ordinal position of list items in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 37:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behavior, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Subiaul F, Cantlon JF, Holloway RL, Terrace HS (2004) Cognitive imitation in rhesus macaques. Science 305:407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subiaul F, Romansky K, Cantlon JF, Klein T, Terrace H (2007) Cognitive imitation in 2-year-old children (Homo sapiens): a comparison with rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 10:369–375. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0070-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subiaul F, Anderson S, Brandt J, Elkins J (2012) Multiple imitation mechanisms in children. Dev Psychol 48:1165–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz KB, Chen S, Terrace HS (1991) Serial learning by rhesus monkeys: I. Acquisition and retention of multiple four-item lists. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:396–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz KB, Chen S, Terrace HS (2000) Serial learning by rhesus monkeys: II. Learning four-item lists by trial and error. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 26:274–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1991) Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: I. Basic evidence. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:81–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace H (2001) Chunking and serially organized behavior in pigeons, monkeys and humans. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition [On-line]. www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/terrace/

  • Terrace H (2002) The comparative psychology of chunking. In: Fountain S (ed) Animal cognition and sequential behavior. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston, pp 23–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (2005) The simultaneous chain: a new approach to serial learning. Trends Cogn Sci 9:202–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS, McGonigle B (1994) Memory and representation of serial order by children, monkeys, and pigeons. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 3:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS, Son LK, Brannon EM (2003) Serial expertise of rhesus macaques. Psychol Sci 14:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Chikako Suda-King and the Zookeepers at Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park for facilitating data collection with the great apes, and the research assistants from GWU who helped carry out data collection with children.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Renner.

Ethics declarations

The portion of the research involving human children was approved by the George Washington University Institutional Review Board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The portion of the research involving orangutans was approved by the George Washington University IACUC and Smithsonian Institution ACUC. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renner, E., Price, E.E. & Subiaul, F. Sequential recall of meaningful and arbitrary sequences by orangutans and human children: Does content matter?. Anim Cogn 19, 39–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0911-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0911-z

Keywords

Navigation