Abstract
Succinic acid is widely applied to chemical, pharmaceutical, food, and agricultural industries. With the rapid development of these industries, a great demand of succinic acid is required. The acid-tolerance and succinic acid production of Actinobacillus succinogenes strain were improved by using genome shuffling. Results showed that one modified strain AS-F32, with the best acid resistance and the highest succinic acid production, was obtained after 3 cycles of genome shuffling. The minimum growth pH of AS-F32 was 3.5, and the acid production and cell dry weight were 5.1 and 4.8 g/L in flask, improved 2.6 and 1.85 times over the start strain As-R2. Furthermore, the succinic acid yield of As-32 was 31.2 g/L and the dry cell weight was increased 44.4% by maintaining pH 4.8 with 7.0 M NH4OH in 5 L bioreactor, increased 1.1 times than the original strain As-R2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn JH, Jang YS, Sang YL. Production of succinic acid by metabolically engineered microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 42: 54–66 (2016)
Alonso S, Rendueles M, Díaz M. Microbial production of specialty organic acids from renewable and waste materials. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 35: 497–513 (2015)
Biot-Pelletier D, Martin VJJ. Evolutionary engineering by genome shuffling. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98: 3877 (2014)
Carlson A, Coggio B, Lau K, Mercogliano C, Millis J. Industrial Production of Succinic Acid. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2016)
Chen Y, Nielsen J. Biobased organic acids production by metabolically engineered microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 37: 165–172 (2016)
Dai MH, Copley SD. Genome shuffling improves degradation of the anthropogenic pesticide pentachlorophenol by sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 2391–2397 (2004)
Jiang M, Dai W, Xi Y, Wu M, Kong X, Ma J, Zhang M, Chen K, Wei P. Succinic acid production from sucrose by actinobacillus succinogenes NJ113. Bioresour. Technol. 153: 327–332 (2014)
Lee PC, Lee SY, Hong SH, Chang HN, Park SC. Biological conversion of wood hydrolysate to succinic acid by anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens. Biotechnol. Lett. 25: 111 (2003)
Li Q, Wang D, Wu Y, Li W, Zhang Y, Xing J, Su Z. One step recovery of succinic acid from fermentation broths by crystallization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 72: 294–300 (2010)
Liang LY, Liu RM, Ma JF, Chen KQ, Jiang M, Wei P. Increased production of succinic acid in Escherichia coli by overexpression of malate dehydrogenase. Biotechnol. Lett. 33: 2439–2444 (2011)
Liu R, Liang L, Li F, Wu M, Chen K, Ma J, Jiang M, Wei P, Ouyang P. Efficient succinic acid production from lignocellulosic biomass by simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose in engineered Escherichia coli. Bioresour. Technol. 149: 84–91 (2013)
Luna-Flores CH, Palfreyman RW, Krömer JO, Nielsen LK, Marcellin E. Improved production of propionic acid using genome shuffling. Biotechnol. J. 12 (2016)
Oh IJ, Kim DH, Oh EK, Lee SY, Lee J. Optimization and scale-up of succinic acid production by Mannheimia succiniciproducens LPK7. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 167 (2009)
Pinazo JM, Domine ME, Parvulescu V, Petru F. Sustainability metrics for succinic acid production: a comparison between biomass-based and petrochemical routes. Catal. Today 239: 17–24 (2015)
Pleissner D, Dietz D, van Duuren JB, Wittmann C, Yang X, Lin CS, Venus J. Biotechnological production of organic acids from renewable resources. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. (2017)
Song H, Sang YL. Production of succinic acid by bacterial fermentation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 39: 352–361 (2006)
Thuy NT, Kongkaew A, Flood A, Boontawan A. Fermentation and crystallization of succinic acid from Actinobacillus succinogenes ATCC55618 using fresh cassava root as the main substrate. Bioresour. Technol. 233: 342 (2017)
Vuoristo KS, Mars AE, Sanders JPM, Eggink G, Weusthuis RA (2016) Metabolic Engineering of TCA Cycle for Production of Chemicals. Trends Biotechnol 34(3):191–197
Wang HK, Sun Y, Chen C, Sun Z, Zhou YC, Shen FD, Zhang HP, Dai YJ. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus plantarum for improving antifungal activity. Food Control 32: 341–347 (2013)
Wang Y, Li Y, Pei X, Yu L, Feng Y. Genome-shuffling improved acid tolerance and L-lactic acid volumetric productivity in Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J. Biotechnol. 129: 510–515 (2007)
Wittmann C, Liao JC, Ahn JH, Jang YS, Sang YL. Succinic Acid. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2017)
Wu M, Li X, Guo S, Lemma WD, Zhang W, Ma J, Jia H, Wu H, Jiang M, Ouyang P. Enhanced succinic acid production under acidic conditions by introduction of glutamate decarboxylase system in E. coli AFP111. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 40: 1–9 (2016)
Ye G, Jiang M, Chen K, Li J, Xi Y, Huang X, Wei P. Breeding of ammonium-tolerant mutants of Actinobacillus succinogenes for succinic acid production and effect of ammonium. Chin. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 26: 183–188 (2010)
Yu L, Pei X, Lei T, Wang Y, Feng Y. Genome shuffling enhanced L-lactic acid production by improving glucose tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J. Biotechnol. 134: 154–159 (2008)
Zhang YF, Liu SY, Du YH, Feng WJ, Liu JH, Qiao JJ. Genome shuffling of Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis YF11 for improving nisin Z production and comparative analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 97: 2528–2541 (2014)
Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WPC, Cardayré SBD. Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature 415: 644–646 (2002)
Zhao J, Zhang C, Lu J, Lu Z. Enhancement of fengycin production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by ge. Can. J. Microbiol. 62: 431–436 (2015)
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Jilin Province Sci-tech Department, People’s Republic of China for providing financial support (Grant No. 20140519011JH).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors whose names are listed above state that they have no conflict in terms of either financial interest or nonfinancial interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, S., You, Y., Xia, F. et al. Genome shuffling improved acid-tolerance and succinic acid production of Actinobacillus succinogenes. Food Sci Biotechnol 28, 817–822 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0505-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0505-z