Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is lipstick associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lipstick use has been hypothesized to be a risk factor of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of this study was to investigate the association between lipstick use and risk of SLE. We performed an Internet-based case–control study of SLE with Google™ users searching on medical key terms as the source population. Cases were diagnosed within 5 years and met ≥4 ACR criteria for SLE by medical record review. Controls were matched to cases on age, gender, race, ethnicity, region of residence, reference year, education, and income using propensity score. Demographic characteristics and lifestyle factors were collected using an online questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression models were used for the analyses with smoking, alcohol consumption, permanent hair dye use, and chemical hair straightener use adjusted. The analysis included 124 cases and 248 matched controls of whom 96% were females and 81% were whites. The median of disease duration was 2 years (range 0–4 years). Using lipstick at least 3 days/week was significantly associated with increased risk of SLE (adjusted OR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.04–2.82). There was a trend of greater risk with earlier age of initiation of lipstick use (<16 years vs. never use; OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.01–3.76, p trend = 0.02) and with increased frequency of use (7 days/week vs. never use; OR = 1.75, 95%CI = 0.89–3.44, p trend = 0.07). Biologic effects of chemicals present in lipsticks absorbed across the buccal mucosa and confounding from unmeasured lifestyle factors could be the explanation of this association. Epidemiologic studies of SLE should include this exposure in exploring its environmental triggers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deapen D, Escalante A, Weinrib L, Horwitz D, Bachman B, Roy-Burman P, Walker A, Mack TM (1992) A revised estimate of twin concordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 35:311–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fessel WJ (1974) Systemic lupus erythematosus in the community. Incidence, prevalence, outcome, and first symptoms; the high prevalence in black women. Arch Intern Med 134:1027–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McAlindon T (2000) Update on the epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: new spins on old ideas. Curr Opin Rheumatol 12:104–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amano K, Leung PS, Rieger R, Quan C, Wang X, Marik J, Suen YF, Kurth MJ, Nantz MH, Ansari AA, Lam KS, Zeniya M, Matsuura E, Coppel RL, Gershwin ME (2005) Chemical xenobiotics and mitochondrial autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis: identification of antibodies against a common environmental, cosmetic, and food additive, 2-octynoic acid. J Immunol 174:5874–5883

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace DJ, Weisman MH (2002) The role of environmental factors in rheumatic diseases. Bull Rheum Dis 51:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lim SY, Ghosh SK (2003) Autoreactive responses to an environmental factor: 1. Phthalate induces antibodies exhibiting anti-DNA specificity. Immunology 110:482–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim SY, Ghosh SK (2004) Autoreactive responses to an environmental factor. 2. Phthalate-induced anti-DNA specificity is downregulated by autoreactive cytotoxic T cells. Immunology 112:94–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim SY, Ghosh SK (2005) Autoreactive responses to environmental factors: 3. Mouse strain-specific differences in induction and regulation of anti-DNA antibody responses due to phthalate-isomers. J Autoimmun 25:33–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burry JN (1969) Lipstick and lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 281:620–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McAlindon T, Wang J, Formica M, Kay A, Tighiouart H, Chaisson C, Fletcher J (2008) Feasibility and validity were demonstrated of an online case–control study using the prototype of recent-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). J Clin Epidemiol (in press)

  11. McAlindon TE, Formica M, Palmer JR, Lafyatis R, Rosenberg L (2003) Assessment of strategies for identifying diagnosed cases of systemic lupus erythematosus through self-report. Lupus 12:754–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40:1725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ (1982) The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 25:1271–1277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper GS, Dooley MA, Treadwell EL, St. Clair EW, Gilkenson GS (2002) Risk factors for development of systemic lupus erythematosus: allergies, infections, and family history. J Clin Epidemiol 55:982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons LS (2004) Performing a 1:N case–control match on propensity score. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual SAS Users Group International (SUGI) Conference, SAS Institute, Cary, NC

  17. Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Case–control studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harley JB, James JA (1999) Epstein–Barr virus infection may be an environmental risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus in children and teenagers. Arthritis Rheum 42:1782–1783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant P60 AR47785 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, P.O. Box 406, Boston, MA, 02111, USA

    Jun Wang, Ashley B. Kay, Jeremiah Fletcher, Margaret K. Formica & Timothy E. McAlindon

Authors
  1. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashley B. Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeremiah Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Margaret K. Formica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Timothy E. McAlindon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Kay, A.B., Fletcher, J. et al. Is lipstick associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)?. Clin Rheumatol 27, 1183–1187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0937-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0937-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation