Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Early spondyloarthropathy: scintigraphic, biological, and clinical findings in MRI-positive patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are no specific diagnostic tests or a gold standard method for measuring disease activity and outcome in spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Many different methods have been developed to assess the signs and symptoms in SpA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of scintigraphy, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Bath Ankilosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in the evaluation of disease activity in early axial SpA diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty early MRI-positive axial SpA patients (23 males, 7 females) with a median age of 35 (18–55) years and a median duration of inflammatory low back pain of 24 (8–60) months were included in the study. In the patients with sacroiliitis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of disease activity parameters were determined regarding MRI as the gold standard method. The sensitivities of quantitative scintigraphy, visual scintigraphy, ESR, CRP, and BASDAI were 32, 82, 35, 71, and 60%, respectively. The specificities of quantitative scintigraphy, ESR, CRP, and BASDAI were 100, 100, 50, and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive values of quantitative scintigraphy, visual scintigraphy, ESR, CRP, and BASDAI were 100, 92, 100, 95, and 100%, respectively. The negative predictive values of quantitative scintigraphy, ESR, CRP, and BASDAI were 9, 10, 11, and 15%, respectively. Regarding MRI as the gold standard in the evaluation of disease activity, combined visual and quantitative bone scintigraphy can be valuable in patients with MRI-incompatible implants. Additionally, use of cheaper, simple, and readily reproducible tests such as CRP and BASDAI together could be valuable and practical in detecting disease activity in long-term follow-up of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kataria RK, Brent LH (2004) Spondyloarthropathies. Am Fam Physician 15:2853–2860

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braun J, Sieper J, Bollow M (2000) Imaging of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 19:51–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA et al (2004) How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 63:535–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollow M, Hermann K-GA, Biedermann T (2005) Very early spondyloarthritis: where the inflammation in the sacroiliac joints starts. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1644–1646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, Landewe R et al (2005) Measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: patient and physician have different perspectives. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:789–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun J, van der Heijde D (2002) Imaging and scoring in ankylosing spondylitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:573–604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baraliakos X, Braun J (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging in spondyloarthropathies. Joint Bone Spine 73:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber U, Pfirrmann CW, Kissling RO et al (2007) Whole body MR imaging in ankylosing spondylitis: a descriptive pilot study in patients with suspected early and active confirmed ankylosing spondylitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 278:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Shea F, Salonen D, Inman R (2007) The challenge of early diagnosis in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 34:5–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Collantes E, Veroz R, Escudero A et al (2000) Can some cases of ‘possible’ spondyloarthropathy be classified as ‘definite’ or ‘undifferentiated’ spondyloarthropathy? Value of criteria for spondyloarthropathies. Spanish Spondyloarthropathy Study Group. Joint Bone Spine 67:516–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Battafarano DF, West SG, Rak KM et al (1993) Comparison of bone scan, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 23:161–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blum U, Buitrago-Tellez C, Mundinger A et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis—a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI. J Rheumatol 23:2107–2115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N et al (2003) Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 44:218–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG et al (2004) MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiol 33:15–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Munoz-Villanueva MC, Munoz-Gomariz E, Escudero-Contreras A et al (2003) Biological and clinical markers of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 30:2729–2732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zochling J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19:346–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Braun J, Bollow M, Eggens U et al (1994) Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with fast imaging in the detection of early and advanced sacroiliitis in spondylarthropathy patients. Arthritis Rheum 37:1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kacar G, Kacar C, Karayalcin B et al (1998) Quantitative sacroiliac joint scintigraphy in normal subjects and patients with sacroiliitis. Ann Nucl Med 12:169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miron SD, Khan MA, Wiesen EJ et al (1983) The value of quantitative sacroiliac scintigraphy in detection of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 2:407–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Inanc N, Atagunduz P, Sen F et al (2005) The investigation of sacroiliitis with different imaging techniques in spondyloarthropathies. Rheumatol Int 25:591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yildiz A, Gungor F, Tuncer T et al (2001) The evaluation of sacroiliitis using 99mTc-nanoclloid and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 22:785–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin WY, Wang SJ (1998) Influence of age and gender on quantitative sacroiliac joint scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 39:1269–1272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dodig D, Domljan Z, Popovic S et al (1988) Effect of imaging time on the values of the sacroiliac index. Eur J Nucl Med 14:504–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin WY, Wang SJ (1996) The influence of two bone agents (99Tcm-pyrophosphate and 99Tcm-methylenediphosphonate) on quantitative sacroiliac joint scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 17:1035–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis MC, Turner DA, Charters JR et al (1984) Quantitative sacroiliac scintigraphy. The effect of method of selection of region of interest. Clin Nucl Med 9:334–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerr HE, Sturrock RD (1999) Clinical aspects, outcome assessment, disease course, and extra-articular features of spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 11:235–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ozgocmen S, Godekmerdan A, Ozkurt-Zengin F (2007) Acute-phase response, clinical measures and disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine 74:249–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, de Klerk E et al (1999) Relative value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:980–984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache JP et al (1999) Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in axial involvement of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:971–974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yildirim K, Erdal A, Karatay S et al (2004) Relationship between some acute phase reactants and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. South Med J 97:350–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jee WH, McCauley TR, Lee SH et al (2004) Sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: association of MR findings with disease activity. Magn Reson Imaging 22:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S et al (2006) MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1420–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG et al (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Akkoc Y, Karatepe AG, Akat S et al (2005) A Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index: reliability and validity. Rheumatol Int 25:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, van Tubergen A, Spoorenberg A et al (2004) The influence of peripheral arthritis on disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis patients as measured with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. Arthritis Rheum 51:154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Schiottz-Christensen B et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Abnormalities correlated to clinical and laboratory findings. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:234–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan MA (2002) Update on spondyloarthropathies. Ann Intern Med 136:896–907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Williamson L, Dockerty JL, Dalbeth N et al (2004) Clinical assessment of sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 are poor predictors of sacroiliitis diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:85–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

    Orhan Akdeniz, Gamze Alaylı, Kıvanç Cengiz & Ferhan Cantürk

  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

    Fevziye Canbaz Tosun

  3. Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

    Barış Diren & Mustafa Bekir Selçuk

  4. Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

    Tevfik Sünter

Authors
  1. Orhan Akdeniz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gamze Alaylı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fevziye Canbaz Tosun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barış Diren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kıvanç Cengiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mustafa Bekir Selçuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tevfik Sünter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ferhan Cantürk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamze Alaylı.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akdeniz, O., Alaylı, G., Tosun, F.C. et al. Early spondyloarthropathy: scintigraphic, biological, and clinical findings in MRI-positive patients. Clin Rheumatol 27, 469–474 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0730-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0730-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation