Abstract
In many cases it is observed that drains or piezometers used in hydrogeology or landslide mitigation, often at considerable cost, may partly or wholly lose their function—even in few months—due to phenomena such as scaling, fouling, corrosion, etc. Several techniques are already available to overcome these problems, but none has proved decisive and/or effective in every situation. The use of ultrasonic technology in this context has certainly highlighted the complexity of the physical and chemical phenomena that characterize these kinds of problems. Analyzing the results obtained from tens of laboratory tests, it was noted that several factors play a role, and that such factors can somehow influence the effect of ultrasonic waves in removing fouling. However, it was highlighted that, for small diameter drainage (<10 cm in diameter) applications, using continuous or pulse frequencies of 25–20 kHz can give amazing results. The action of these mechanical waves results in the removal of impurities from solid surfaces. Any foreign object lodged or firmly anchored to the internal or external surface of the drain is broken down and crushed by ultrasonic waves. The forecasts for their useful application are optimistic: the working time was estimated, from laboratory tests, in the order of tens of seconds per meter so the time this technique should takes for the operation of cleaning in real cases would be almost 1–2 h for each drain, depending of course on the length, nature and severity of clogging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biavati G (2007) Valutazione empirica dell’efficacia di sistemi drenanti realizzati su 13 frane dell’Appennino emiliano. Giornale di Geologia Applicata 7:31–42
Cano M, Tomàs R (2013) Assessment of corrective measures for alleviating slope instability in carbonatic Flysch formations: Alicante (SE of Spain) case study. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:509–522
Chiesa G (1991) Pozzi per acqua. II° edizione. Edizioni Hoepli, Milano, p 562
Clarence J, Beverly J, Cigich J (1990) Ultrasonic tube cleaning system. US 4966177 http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19901030&CC=US&NR=4966177A&KC=A. Accessed 2012
Gilmor R (1989) Ultrasonic machining and orbital abrasion techniques—SME Technical Paper (Series) AIR, NM89-419, pp 1–20
Hoffjann C, Maier-Witt J, Zierold W (1997) Procedure for removing hard deposits in pipeline. DE19539806 http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=DE&NR=19539806A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=19970430&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP,m. Accessed 2012
Hutchinson JN (1977) Assessment of the effectiveness of corrective measures in relation to geological conditions and types of slope movement. Bull Eng Geol Environ 16:131–155
Lucas M, Chapman GM (1989) Vibration analysis at ultrasonic frequencies—the 1989 ASME Ds. Tech’l Conf.-12th Biennal Conf on Mech’l Vib. And Noise, Montreal, DE vol 18-4, September 1989, pp 235–240
Mandrone G (2006) Engineering geological mapping of heterogeneous rock masses in the northern Apennines: an example from the Parma Valley (Italy). Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:245–252
Olsthoorn TN (1982) Clogging of recharge wells, main subjects. KIWA Commun 72:150
Pérez-Paricio A (2001) Integrated modelling of clogging processes on artificial groundwater recharge. Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), PhD Thesis
Rozenberg LD (1970) Physical principles of ultrasonic technology. Plenum, New York
Turievskij G (1977) Ultrasonic plant for pipe cleaning. SU 565726 (A1). http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=SU&NR=565726A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=19770725&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP. Accessed 2012
Acknowledgments
Many thank to Maurizio Colla (Somiter srl) for useful discussions, and Mario Ferraris (Sirius Electrics srl) for availability, interest and support for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandrone, G. An ultrasonic prototype to remedy pipes clogging: experimental effects on drains used for landslide mitigation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 673–680 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0833-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0833-7