Skip to main content
Log in

Full pooling in multi-period contracting with adverse selection and noncommitment

  • Original papers
  • Published:
Review of Economic Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper analyses multi-period regulation or procurement policies under asymmetric information between the regulator and regulated firms. As well known in the literature, some degree of separation is always optimal under any form of commitment. In contrast, we show that full pooling is optimal under noncommitment when the discount factor is sufficiently high. We also discuss the meaning of full pooling under double randomization. Finally, we provide a graphical analysis of the second-best policy in terms of the regulator's commitment capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 4 December 1996 / 7 October 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dionne, G., Fluet, C. Full pooling in multi-period contracting with adverse selection and noncommitment. Rev Econ Design 5, 1–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100580050045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100580050045

Navigation