Abstract
The significant increase in urbanization has resulted in greater use of the subsurface in urban planning and, therefore, increased interaction between groundwater and underground infrastructure. Numerical models are the primary tool adopted to manage the resulting problems; however, their construction is time- and cost-consuming. Groundwater-level time-series analysis can be a complementary method, as this data-driven approach does not require an extensive understanding of the geological and boundary conditions, even if providing insights into the hydrogeologic behaviour. Thus, a data-driven approach was adopted to analyse groundwater time-series of the shallow aquifer, occupied by several underground structures, beneath Milan city (Northern Italy). Statistical (Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator, autocorrelation and cross-correlation, hierarchical cluster analysis) and geospatial techniques were used to detect the potential variables influencing the groundwater levels of 95 monitoring wells, covering the period 2005–2019. A general rising trend of the water table was identified, with local hydrogeologic differences in the western and southernmost areas. Based on time-series analysis results, four management areas have been identified. These areas could act as future geographic units with specific groundwater management strategies. In particular, subsurface public car parks can be classified with respect to groundwater flooding as (1) not submerged, (2) possibly critical, or (3) submerged at different groundwater conditions. According to these outcomes, targeted guidelines for constructing new car parks have been elaborated for each management area. The methodology proved to be efficient in improving the urban conceptual model and helping stakeholders design the planned underground development, considering groundwater aspects.
Résumé
L’accroissement considérable de l’urbanisation s’est traduit par un recours au sous-sol plus important dans la planification urbaine et ainsi a accru l’interaction entre les eaux souterraines et les infrastructures souterraines. Les modèles numériques sont les premiers outils adoptés pour gérer les problèmes qui en résultent; cependant, leur élaboration nécessite du temps et de l’argent. L’analyse des séries chronologiques du niveau d’eau souterraine peut être une méthode complémentaire dans la mesure où cette approche basée sur la donnée ne nécessite pas une compréhension approfondie des conditions géologiques et de leurs conditions aux limites, même si elle fournit des informations sur le fonctionnement hydrogéologique. Ainsi, une approche axée sur la donnée a été adoptée pour analyser les chroniques piézométriques de l’aquifère peu profond, occupé par diverses structures souterraines situées sous la ville de Milan (Italie du Nord). Les techniques statistiques (estimation du test de Man-Kendall et de la pente de Sen, autocorrélation et corrélation croisée, analyse du regroupement hiérarchique) et géospatiales ont été utilisées pour détecter les variables potentielles influençant le niveau des eaux souterraines de 95 piézomètres au cours de la période 2005–2019. Une tendance générale à la hausse de la surface piézométrique a été identifiée, avec des différences hydrogéologiques locales dans les zones ouest et extrême sud. Sur la base des résultats de l’analyse des chroniques, quatre zones de gestion ont été identifiées. Ces régions pourraient fonctionner dans le futur comme des unités géographiques dotées de stratégies de gestion des eaux souterraines spécifiques. En particulier, les parkings publics souterrains peuvent être classés au regard de l’inondation par les eaux souterraines en (1) non submergés, (2) possiblement en situation critique, (3) submergés pour différents états des eaux souterraines. En fonction de ces résultats, des lignes directrices ciblées pour la construction de nouveaux parkings ont été élaborées pour chaque zone de gestion. La méthode s’est avérée efficace pour améliorer le modèle conceptuel urbain et aider les parties prenantes à concevoir le développement souterrain prévu, en tenant compte des aspects liés aux eaux souterraines.
Resumen
El significativo aumento de la urbanización ha dado lugar a un mayor uso del subsuelo en la planificación urbana y, por tanto, a una mayor interacción entre las aguas subterráneas y las infraestructuras del subsuelo. Los modelos numéricos son la principal herramienta adoptada para gestionar los problemas resultantes; sin embargo, su construcción requiere mucho tiempo y recursos. El análisis de series temporales del nivel de las aguas subterráneas puede ser un método complementario, ya que este enfoque basado en datos no requiere un amplio conocimiento de las condiciones geológicas y de contorno, aunque sí proporciona información sobre el comportamiento hidrogeológico. Así, se adoptó un enfoque basado en datos para analizar las series temporales de las aguas subterráneas del acuífero poco profundo, ocupado por varias estructuras subterráneas, bajo la ciudad de Milán (norte de Italia). Se utilizaron técnicas estadísticas (estimador de la pendiente de Mann-Kendall y Sen, autocorrelación y correlación cruzada, análisis jerárquico de conglomerados) y geoespaciales para detectar las posibles variables que influyen en los niveles de las aguas subterráneas de 95 pozos de monitoreo, cubriendo el período 2005–2019. Se identificó una tendencia general al aumento del nivel freático, con diferencias hidrogeológicas locales en las zonas más occidentales y meridionales. A partir de los resultados del análisis de las series temporales, se han identificado cuatro zonas de gestión. Estas zonas podrían actuar como futuras unidades geográficas con estrategias específicas de gestión de las aguas subterráneas. En particular, los estacionamientos públicos subterráneos pueden clasificarse con respecto a las inundaciones de aguas subterráneas como (1) no sumergidos, (2) posiblemente críticos, o (3) sumergidos en diferentes condiciones de aguas subterráneas. De acuerdo con estos resultados, se han elaborado directrices específicas para la construcción de nuevos estacionamientos en cada zona de gestión. La metodología demostró ser eficaz para mejorar el modelo conceptual urbano y ayudar a los interesados a diseñar el desarrollo subterráneo previsto, teniendo en cuenta los aspectos relacionados con las aguas subterráneas.
摘要
城市化的显著增加导致在城市规划中更多地使用地下空间, 因此增加了地下水和地下基础设施之间的相互作用。数值模型是用于管理由此产生的问题的重要工具; 然而, 构建模型既费时又不经济。地下水位时间序列分析可以是一种补充方法, 因为这种数据驱动的方法不需要对地质和边界条件有深入的了解, 即使提供了对水文地质行为的知识。因此, 采用数据驱动的方法来分析米兰市(意大利北部)由多个地下结构构成的浅层含水层地下水时间序列。统计(Mann-Kendall和 Sen的斜率估计、自相关和互相关、层次聚类分析)和地理空间技术用于分析响 2005–2019 年期间 95 口监测井地下水位的潜在变量。发现地下水位总体呈上升趋势, 西部和最南部地区存在局部水文地质差异。根据时间序列分析结果, 确定了四个管理领域。这些地区可以作为具有特定地下水管理战略的未来地理单元。特别是, 地下公共停车场可以根据地下水淹没分类为(1)未淹没, (2)可能很严重, 或 (3)在不同的地下水条件下淹没。根据这些成果, 为每个管理区制定了建设新停车场的有针对性的指导方针。事实证明, 该方法考虑了地下水方面, 在改进城市概念模型和帮助利益相关者设计地下开发计划方面是有效的。
Riassunto
Il significativo aumento dell’urbanizzazione ha comportato un maggiore utilizzo del sottosuolo nella pianificazione urbana e, quindi, una maggiore interazione tra la falda e le infrastrutture sotterranee. I modelli numerici sono il principale strumento adottato per gestire i problemi che ne conseguono; tuttavia, la loro costruzione è dispendiosa sia in termini di tempo che di denaro. L’analisi delle serie storiche dei livelli piezometrici può rappresentare un metodo complementare, poiché questo approccio basato sui dati non richiede una comprensione approfondita delle condizioni geologiche e al contorno, pur fornendo informazioni sul comportamento idrogeologico. Pertanto, è stato adottato un approccio basato sui dati per analizzare le serie storiche dei livelli piezometrici della falda freatica, occupata da diverse strutture sotterranee, per la città di Milano (Nord Italia). Tecniche statistiche (Mann-Kendall e Sen’s slope, autocorrelazione e cross-correlazione, cluster analysis con metodo gerarchico) e geo spaziali sono state utilizzate per identificare le potenziali variabili che influenzano i livelli piezometrici di 95 piezometri, per il periodo 2005–2019. È stato individuato un generale innalzamento della falda freatica, con locali differenze idrogeologiche nei settori occidentali e meridionali. Sulla base dei risultati dell’analisi delle serie storiche, sono state identificate quattro aree di gestione. Queste aree potrebbero fungere da future unità geografiche, con specifiche strategie di gestione delle acque sotterranee. In particolare, a seconda delle condizioni idrogeologiche, i parcheggi pubblici sotterranei possono essere classificati, relativamente ad un possibile allagamento, come (1) non sommersi, (2) eventualmente critici, oppure (3) sommersi. Sulla base di questi risultati, sono state elaborate linee guida specifiche per la realizzazione di nuovi parcheggi per ciascuna area di gestione. La metodologia si è dimostrata efficace nel migliorare il modello concettuale in ambito urbano e nell’aiutare i decisori nella progettazione dello sviluppo sotterraneo previsto, tenendo conto degli aspetti idrogeologici.
Resumo
O aumento significativo da urbanização resultou em maior uso do subsolo no planejamento urbano e, portanto, maior interação entre as águas subterrâneas e a infraestrutura subterrânea. Os modelos numéricos são a principal ferramenta adotada para gerenciar os problemas resultantes; no entanto, sua construção é demorada e custosa. A análise de séries temporais de nível de água subterrânea pode ser um método complementar, pois essa abordagem baseada em dados não requer uma compreensão extensa das condições geológicas e de contorno, mesmo que forneça informações sobre o comportamento hidrogeológico. Assim, uma abordagem baseada em dados foi adotada para analisar séries temporais de águas subterrâneas do aquífero raso, ocupado por várias estruturas subterrâneas, sob a cidade de Milão (norte da Itália). Técnicas estatísticas (estimador de inclinação de Mann-Kendall e Sen, autocorrelação e correlação cruzada, análise hierárquica de agrupamentos) e geoespaciais foram usadas para detectar as variáveis potenciais que influenciam os níveis de água subterrânea de 95 poços de monitoramento, cobrindo o período 2005–2019. Foi identificada uma tendência geral de aumento do lençol freático, com diferenças hidrogeológicas locais nas áreas mais a oeste e sul. Com base nos resultados da análise de séries temporais, foram identificadas quatro áreas de gestão. Essas áreas podem atuar como futuras unidades geográficas com estratégias específicas de gestão de águas subterrâneas. Em particular, os estacionamentos públicos subterrâneos podem ser classificados em relação às inundações subterrâneas como (1) não submersos, (2) possivelmente críticos ou (3) submersos em diferentes condições de águas subterrâneas. De acordo com esses resultados, foram elaboradas diretrizes para a construção de novos estacionamentos para cada área de gestão. A metodologia mostrou-se eficiente para aprimorar o modelo conceitual urbano e auxiliar os interessados a projetar o desenvolvimento subterrâneo planejado, considerando os aspectos hídricos subterrâneos.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Groundwater represents the most valuable source of freshwater on a global scale (Li et al. 2013a), as it is used for drinking, agricultural and industrial purposes (Filimonau and Barth 2016). As the world population is projected to grow in the next decades, increasing demand for this resource is expected, and this may provoke stress both in terms of groundwater quality and quantity (Pollicino et al. 2021); in particular, groundwater demand is gradually increasing in urban areas, where 70% of the world population is expected to be living by 2050 (Un-Habitat 2012). To limit urban sprawl, the tendency to look for new building spaces in the vertical direction has increased (Li et al. 2013b, c; Koziatek and Dragićević 2017), leading to enhanced use of urban underground (Parriaux et al. 2007; Sterling et al. 2012; Bobylev 2016; Vähäaho 2016). In the last few decades, as a result of the deindustrialization process, several cities worldwide have faced rising groundwater levels, which has generated some interference between underground infrastructure (i.e. basements, car parks, and subway lines) and groundwater (Wilkinson 1985; George 1992; Hernández et al. 1997; Vázquez-Suñé et al. 1997; Mudd et al. 2004; Hayashi et al. 2009; Lamé 2013; Ducci and Sellerino 2015). The groundwater/infrastructure interaction needs to be properly managed to ensure a sustainable use of urban underground spaces. Numerical groundwater flow modelling can be used for evaluating the interference between groundwater and underground structures (Vázquez-Suñé et al. 2005; García-Gil et al. 2015) and for identifying possible management strategies. A variety of three-dimensional (3D) numerical models has been realized worldwide (Attard et al. 2015); however, the construction of a 3D numerical model is generally a multistep procedure requiring detailed knowledge of the aquifer system, both from the geological and hydrological features and, thus, such models take a considerable amount of time to develop. As the information is sometimes lacking or scattered among different sources, the conceptual model also needs to be frequently revised, which could be considered costly and time-consuming (Vázquez-Suñé et al. 2005). Within this scope, data-driven techniques can constitute a valid complementary approach, providing preliminary insights into the main drivers affecting the aquifer behaviour (Chae et al. 2010; Obergfell et al. 2013), without requiring an extensive approximation of subsurface parameters and boundary conditions. Generally, adopting data-driven methods is faster and more easy-applicable than numerical models (Bakker and Schaars 2019) and could represent a reasonable compromise between model complexity and costs (Stevenazzi et al. 2017); however, time-series analysis is indispensable to support groundwater model calibration (Bakker and Schaars 2019). In particular, time-series analysis of groundwater levels allows one to detect trends (Patle et al. 2015), and thereby identify the causes of water level variations through the investigation of input-output connections (Obergfell et al. 2013); for these reasons, this approach can be adopted to plan effective groundwater management strategies, thus bringing valuable information to planners and decision-makers (Best et al. 2021). Also, as modelling should make maximum use of existing data, by assimilating its information content (Lotti et al. 2021), data-driven methods could support the construction of a three-dimensional (3D) numerical model.
Different time-series analysis techniques have been applied to interpret groundwater systems processes. Statistical tests such as the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator have been widely applied to detect long-term trends from groundwater level series, for evaluating their significance and magnitude (Tabari et al. 2012; Singh et al. 2015; Meggiorin et al. 2021). Furthermore, statistical tests have been sometimes combined with geospatial approaches in a geographical information system (GIS) environment to identify those areas of groundwater-level rise or drawdown, determined by the existence of a trend (Chaudhuri and Ale 2014; de Brito Neto et al. 2016; Anand et al. 2020). On the other hand, clustering techniques have been mainly adopted for groundwater quality, but recently different studies have applied these techniques to groundwater level time series (Pathak and Dodamani 2019; Rinderer et al. 2019; Naranjo-Fernández et al. 2020; Sottani et al. 2020).
The present study aimed at proposing, for the city of Milan (Lombardy, Northern Italy), a data-driven approach to support decision making for urban underground infrastructure in relation to groundwater aspects. In this way, the stakeholders could properly manage the future underground development of the city in a more targeted way, also considering hydrogeologic features. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that groundwater/underground infrastructure interactions have been managed through the support of data-driven methods. A set of statistical techniques has been applied to groundwater-level time series of the shallow aquifer in Milan, with two main purposes: (1) to identify different spatial zones with local hydrogeologic peculiarities, possibly acting as future groundwater management territorial units, and to investigate the potential features influencing groundwater levels (i.e. geology, precipitation, withdrawals, land use); and (2) to elaborate targeted guidelines for underground infrastructure management, mainly focusing on the constructions of new public car parks. Underground car parks have been mainly considered, as their interference with the groundwater has been only partially investigated. Nonetheless, this procedure could be applied to every category of underground infrastructure.
The data-driven analysis proposed in this study has been fine-tuned for the Milan metropolitan area; notwithstanding, it could be applied to other urban areas worldwide that have subsurface infrastructure development and a complex shallow aquifer system that requires an integrated urban groundwater management strategy.
Hydrogeological conceptual model of the study area
The study area (182 km2) is the city of Milan (Fig. 1). It hosts 1.4 million people (Istat 2011) and it is characterized by intense industrial and agricultural development (Bonomi 2009). The land use in the western and southern areas is still mainly agricultural, while the remaining areas of the city are mainly urbanized. A wide hydrographic network characterizes the area (Fig. 1b): among the main rivers, Olona and Seveso are culverted within the city, while the Naviglio Grande and Naviglio Pavese are man-made surface channels mainly used for irrigation. Milan is located in the middle of the Po Plain (Fig. 1a), in proximity to the lowland springs belt and lies on a sedimentary aquifer system whose hydrogeologic structure has been deeply studied in past years (Regione Lombardia and ENI 2002). A recent classification (Regione Lombardia 2016) has identified three main hydro structures: a shallow hydro structure (ISS), an intermediate hydro structure (ISI) and a deep hydro structure (ISP). In the study area, ISS has a medium thickness of 50 m, with a bottom surface ranging from 100 m above sea level (asl; to the north) down to around 50 m asl (to the south). It hosts a shallow aquifer—Fig. 2; Fig. S1 of the electronic supplementary material (ESM—not exploited for drinking needs. This shallow aquifer is the focus of this study and is mainly composed of sands and gravels. The same lithology, but with an increasing presence of silty and clayey layers, characterizes the ISI. Finally, because of a limited amount of data, the ISP has an uncertain lithological composition.
Groundwater has been extensively exploited for industrial use since the early 1960s; around 1975 there was a water-table depth of more than 30 m in the northern sector. Subsequently, since the early 1990s, the dismantling of the biggest factories, mainly located in the northern sector of the town, led the water table to rise once again (i.e., with a maximum rise of about 10–15 m in the northern area), causing flooding episodes for some nonwaterproofed underground structures (Cavallin and Bonomi 1997; Beretta et al. 2004; Gattinoni and Scesi 2017; Colombo et al. 2018), including car parks and the oldest, shallower subway lines (Fig. 1b). Thus, the most recent subway lines (Fig. 1b), also due to their greater depth, were designed with waterproof systems. Public car parks were built in sequential phases starting from the middle of the 1980s. Now, 126 underground public car parks are listed in the territory (Fig. 1b; Table S1 of the ESM). The information (i.e., bottom elevation (m asl), period of construction, location) on subway lines, and public and private car parks is stored in a 3D geodatabase (Sartirana et al. 2020), allowing for proper management of the underground infrastructure in the framework of groundwater management (Fig. 2).
Moreover, the number of low-enthalpy geothermal systems in the shallow aquifer increased in the last decades due to regional laws in the scope of European goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Particularly, open-loop groundwater heat pumps (GWHPs) serve large building systems, mainly in the downtown area (Previati and Crosta 2021a) (Fig. 1b). The average depth of GWHP filters ranges between 17 and 34 m (Regione Lombardia 2021a). In some cases, GWHPs discharge exploited water to surface-water bodies to limit the groundwater rise.
The adoption of the Plan of Government for the Territory (PGT) (Milan Metropolitan City 2019) in 2019 will favour further subsurface occupation by developing new subway line sections and reducing soil consumption with consequent changes in the subsurface. Hence, the need for coordinated management among the stakeholders arises, supported by evidence from shallow-aquifer studies.
Materials and methods
The methodology proposed in this study is composed of 7 steps: (1) dataset pre-processing, (2) groundwater time-series trend analysis, including the Mann-Kendall test, Sen’s slope estimator and a time-series reversal points assessment, (3) correlation analysis, through autocorrelation function (ACF) and cross-correlation function (CCF) with precipitation data; (4) groundwater time-series clustering, applying hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA); (5) water-table reconstruction and groundwater volume calculation under specific groundwater conditions identified at point 2; based on the outcomes of points 1-5, the subsequent steps were (6) identification of groundwater management areas (MAs); and (7) definition of guidelines for underground infrastructure management. A graphical representation of the adopted workflow is given in Fig. 3.
Data-driven time-series analysis
Available data and preprocessing
Groundwater level data were provided by Metropolitana Milanese Spa, the local water supplier. The original dataset spans from 1950 to 2019, but data are scattered over ca. 300 monitoring wells (MWs) changing over time due to the monitoring network evolution (Fig. 1b). Excluding MWs not having a useful data resolution, a subset of the most consistent time series was identified for the time-series analysis, consisting of 95 MWs (Fig.1b) monitored over the 2005–2019 time’s span.
Two measures per year are available (March and September; with 30 observations in total). Once the final dataset had been defined, it was checked for possible errors or outliers (Azzellino et al. 2019). Outlier analysis was performed through the nonparametric interquartile range test, since the Shapiro-Wilk test highlighted that the data distribution was not normal. Errors were corrected manually only if clearly identifiable in the original data (i.e. ground level values), after verifying that they could offer insights into some hydrogeologic process that should not be neglected (Peterson et al. 2018).
As for precipitation, the data of Paderno Dugnano rain gauge (located just northward of the city of Milan) were considered, monitored by the regional environmental protection agency (ARPA Lombardia 2021).
Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator
The Mann-Kendall test (Mann 1945; Kendall 1948) is a rank-based, nonparametric test widely used for trend detection (i.e. upward or downward trend) in hydrological variables since it is nonparametric and robust to extreme data (Singh et al. 2015; Anand et al. 2020; Meggiorin et al. 2021). The null hypothesis (H0) is the absence of a trend, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) is the presence of a significant trend. A confidence level of 95% was used as the threshold value.
The Sen’s slope estimator (Sen 1968) was applied to estimate the magnitude of the analysed trend. It is a nonparametric unbiased estimator of trends, more robust to outliers than a linear regression estimator (Hirsch et al. 1982). A positive value of Sen’s slope indicates an increasing trend, whereas a negative one indicates a decreasing trend.
Time-series reversal points
The reversal points analysis for the time series aimed at identifying when an upward (or downward) trend has been reversed. This could be useful in groundwater management, as it allows one to precisely comprehend the dynamics of the water table in a given period.
The Pettitt test (Pettitt 1979) is a widely applied statistical tool to detect an abrupt change in a dataset. Despite its common use, it seems not so adaptable when trying to identify a pure reversal point (i.e. a shift from an upward trend to a downward trend), at least in small datasets (Frollini et al. 2021).
Therefore, reversal points were identified here as the time-series point determining a change in the sign of the difference between successive couples of data, previously smoothed through a loess function to avoid noise effect. This analysis was performed in the R environment, using the imputeTS package (Moritz and Bartz-Beielstein 2017), ts function (Becker et al. 1988) and stl function (Cleveland et al. 1990).
In this way, only the most recurrent groundwater-level minimum and maximum conditions among the different MWs have been investigated. An additional description of their subsequent application is given in section “Water table reconstruction and groundwater volumes calculation”. Further details on the adopted approach and the R script are available in the ESM.
Autocorrelation and cross-correlation
Autocorrelation is the correlation of a time series with itself at different time lags. It indicates whether the past values of a time-series influence the current state. Here, autocorrelation analysis was performed for all the MWs through the R Package statistics (R Core Team 2021) to investigate at the study scale the “memory effect” of the groundwater system, which can be considered as the requested amount of time to get rid of the dependency from a previous condition (Tamburini and Menichetti 2020).
The cross-correlation is a measure of similarity between two time series as a function of the displacement of one with respect to the other. To evaluate a possible delayed dependency at different time lags of groundwater levels (output series) on rainfall data (input series), a cross-correlation analysis between these variables was conducted. Thus, rainfall data were aggregated at a 6-month time step (cumulative rainfall periods: October–March/April–September) to keep equal data length while correlating the two variables and to avoid spurious conclusions that would arise from not using equal data records (Kumar et al. 2009).
Groundwater time-series clustering
Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed, considering groundwater level measurements at different times as different variables, using the Ward hierarchical method (Ward Jr 1963).
The squared Euclidean distance was adopted as a measure of similarity between samples (Triki et al. 2014; Bloomfield et al. 2015) to compare the groundwater levels of different MWs at individual seasons, without associating the groundwater levels of different seasons, which could have happened when applying other distances typical of the time-series analysis.
In order to analyse both spatial and temporal patterns over a time-series, not only the initial groundwater measurements, but also seasonal differences between couples of successive observations have been considered. In both cases, to guarantee an equal weight for each considered variable in the calculation of the Euclidean distance matrix, HCA was carried out on standardized data (i.e. autoscaling; mean = 0 and variance = 1; Judd 1980). The HCA dataset, therefore, resulted in 95 rows (i.e. monitoring wells) and 59 variables (columns, i.e. groundwater level measures for March–September from 2005 to 2019 and seasonal variations between successive groundwater measures).
The HCA requires continuous data and no missing values. Therefore, missing data were filled, considering trend similarity among neighbouring MWs. First, a GIS analysis was carried out to identify the MWs nearest to those containing missing values. Missing values were then filled by calculating the average difference between the time series containing missing values and the most similar neighbouring MW; this average was calculated for the previous and the following observations surrounding the missing values, and then applied (summing/subtracting) to the date of the missing value. In this way, possible relevant peaks in the groundwater time series were conserved, avoiding any smoothing effect that could result from the time-series interpolation or other filling methods.
Water-table reconstruction and groundwater volumes calculation
Potentiometric maps for the shallow aquifer have been reconstructed, for the identified global minimum and maximum conditions (see section ‘Groundwater minimum and maximum’), and for the last measure of the time series (September 2019, Sep19). Further piezometric levels, available for each specific period both inside and outside the study area (i.e. control points), have been employed to properly reconstruct the potentiometric maps.
As in the study area the presence of a spatial piezometric trend (NW–SE) has been detected (Bonomi et al. 1998; Beretta et al. 2004), groundwater heads in MWs have been interpolated using universal kriging (Isaaks and Srivastava 1989; Goovaerts 1997; Kitanidis 1997; Webster and Oliver 2001). Subsequently, the volume of water in the shallow aquifer, determined from the difference between the potentiometric heads in maps of the different groundwater conditions, has been calculated and the content of mobile water contained in that portion of the subsurface has been estimated considering the effective porosity (ne). Reckoning the quantities of both occupied volumes and mobile water could in fact be deemed as a proper way of assessing the impact of groundwater on different resources, including manmade ones (Bonomi et al. 2010). To do so, geological information on the subsurface was required. The parametrisation of the hydrogeologic properties, such as hydraulic conductivity, has been readapted from a previous work of the research group on the same study area (Bonomi et al. 2010). Classes of effective porosity have been then extracted from the hydraulic conductivity values of the subsurface volumes derived from comparison of the water tables. This step was performed through the use of conversion conductivity–effective porosity tables, previously entered in a reference database (Bonomi et al. 2010, 2014).
Decision management
On the basis of the results that emerged in previous steps, different spatial units (management areas, MAs) have been aggregated as a result of their hydrogeologic features (Chaudhuri and Ale 2013) in the context of a more targeted groundwater management strategy. Moreover, a deeper analysis associated with underground infrastructure, with a focus on public car parks, was elaborated through a GIS methodology previously applied by Sartirana et al. 2020, to evaluate the interaction between public car parks and the water table. This analysis was carried out on the identified groundwater-level minimum and maximum conditions and for Sep19. Based on these results, public car parks have been grouped into three categories with respect to groundwater flooding for each period: not submerged, possibly critical, submerged. A public car park was defined as “not submerged” or “submerged” if the water table was respectively below or above the bottom of the car park structure. The category “possibly critical” included all the public car parks showing a difference between the reference plan and the water table of less than 1 m. Engineering aspects, such as the possible uplift risks generated by buoyancy as a result of the aquifer pressure, are beyond the aims of this work. The identified possibility of submersion for each car park, therefore, facilitated a list of targeted management proposals, including suggested guidelines for the construction of new public car parks, based on the detected hydrogeologic evidence.
Results
Data-driven time-series analysis
Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator
Trend analysis through the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator showed a general increasing trend in the groundwater levels. Results are visible in Fig. 4. Particularly, at 95% confidence level, 86 out of 95 MWs showed an increasing trend throughout the considered period, with a medium slope ranging from 0.20 to 0.60 in the northern sector, from 0.10 to 0.20 in the central portion of the domain, and from 0.00 to 0.10 in the southern area. Only 9 out of 95 MWs did not show significant trends, all located in the westernmost portion of the study area, except for one in the southernmost section.
Groundwater minimum and maximum
Through the adopted approach developed in R, the global groundwater minimum and maximum conditions have been identified. Results are visible in Fig. 5; moreover, for a subset of selected MWs, the identified reversal points are visible, together with their groundwater trends in Fig. 6. The complete list of the identified reversal points for all the MWs is available in Table S2 of the ESM. As observable in Fig. 5, among the considered groundwater level time-series, September 2007 (Sep07) has been mainly identified as the global minimum condition; however, Sep07 is not identifiable as the historical global minimum, which took place at the end of the 1970s, as a consequence of intense industrial exploitation of groundwater (Bonomi 1999). Instead, March 2015 (Mar15) has been detected as the global maximum. As a general description for the study area, Sep07 comes at the end of a decreasing phase that began in December 2002, as described in a previous work about the same area (Sartirana et al. 2020). A rising phase, steeper in the northern sector, as confirmed by the Sen’s slope estimator (Fig. 4), has been detected from Sep07 up to Mar15, while a subsequent declining phase took place from Mar15 up to Sep19 (final measurement of the dataset). Some MWs, mostly located in the peripheral areas, showed their groundwater minimum condition earlier than Sep07 (i.e. Mar07); in contrast, in the northernmost areas, the groundwater minimum was sometimes detected later than Sep07 (i.e. Mar08). Moreover, a higher number of reversal points has been identified for the MWs located in the peripheral sectors (eastern and western sides) and in the southern areas, with respect to the MWs placed in the northern and central parts of the domain (Fig. 6). Local minimum and maximum conditions have been also identified (Table S2 of the ESM): respectively, September 2012 and September 2011. However, these local situations have not been further investigated, thus reconstructing the piezometric surfaces of the water table was only for Sep07, Mar15, and Sep19.
Autocorrelation and cross-correlation with rain data
Autocorrelation analysis was performed on the MWs considering 10 lags. For each MW, the number of significantly autocorrelated lags was determined and this is represented in Fig. 7. Results (Fig. 7a) show that autocorrelation can be significant for up to 6 lags in the northern sector, which correspond to a 3-year time span. In the central part of the area, significant autocorrelation was detected for a maximum of 4 lags (i.e. 2 years), while a more heterogeneous situation is visible in the southernmost part. A westernmost group of MWs shows no degree of correlation. Correlation of groundwater time series with rain data has been evaluated up to lag -2 (possible response time: 1 year), as these lags have been considered as the most environmentally significant; results are shown in Fig. 8.
At lag 0 (i.e. no temporal shift), the MWs located in the most peripheral areas showed a significant correlation with rain data, indicating a direct and fast response of piezometric level to precipitation (Fig. 8a) mainly in the western and the southernmost sectors, which showed a shorter autocorrelation and therefore a lower memory of the groundwater system. A significant but lower correlation was detected in the eastern sector of the domain. Thus, in these areas, groundwater levels respond rapidly to local precipitation events. At lag –1 (response time: 6 months) a more pronounced correlation between rain data and groundwater levels has been noticed in the northern and the central sectors of the domain (Fig. 8b), thus indicating a less rapid response of groundwater levels to rainfall; whereas, a reduced significant correlation has been identified in the western and southern sectors, that showed a significant correlation at lag 0. Finally, at lag –2 (response time: 1 year), a significant correlation with rain data was identified for 74 out of 95 MWs (Fig. 8c), thus showing a widespread dependency of groundwater-level time series on rain data.
Hierarchical cluster analysis
According to the dendrogram in Fig. 9c, the possible solutions are at k = 2, 3, 4 and 8, where k is the number of clusters. MWs have been grouped into eight clusters (C1–C8; Fig. 9a,c), as this allowed a more detailed exploration and interpretation of the study area’s environmental variability (Rinderer et al. 2019). Two clusters (C1 and C4) contain most of the MWs (23 out of 95 are contained in C1, while 34 out of 95 are included in C4); two clusters (C2 and C3) both contain 12 MWs, while the remaining four clusters (C5–C8) contain at most four MWs, thus describing more specific situations. The MWs of C1 are mainly located in the southern sector, while a few are close to the downtown area. These MWs are characterized by a relatively stable groundwater level, with hydraulic head variations of 2–3 m. This characteristic is due to the local geology for the southern MWs, showing groundwater heads close to the ground level, with a constrained possibility of oscillation; close to the downtown area, the nonconsumptive employment of groundwater exerted by GWHPs could contribute to maintaining groundwater levels as relatively stable. Cluster C2 includes 12 MWs located in a transition belt between the northern and the central sector. As illustrated in Fig. 9b, the main differences between C3 and C4 are the average groundwater level of the cluster and the range of hydraulic head variations (i.e. within ~5 m), while the cluster trends are rather similar. Despite this similarity, MWs in C3 are characterized by a steeper rising (around 8–10 m) phase in the period between Sep07 and Mar15 (groundwater minimum and maximum conditions respectively). C4 contains 34 MWs, distributed in the central portion of the domain: the average trend of this group is similar to C1, even if a less oscillating declining phase has been observed between Mar05 and Sep07; also for this cluster, stable groundwater levels could depend on the use of GWHPs. Three MWs located in the northern part of the domain are included in C5: a groundwater level peak for Sep08 was the main driver determining a medium groundwater level trend that differs from C3 and C8, whose MWs are similarly sited northward. C6 and C7 contain four and three MWs respectively: both these clusters group MWs located in the westernmost part of the study area; the average groundwater level of these clusters shows a high fluctuating trend, with no evident rising or declining phases. This may prove a rapid response of the water table to local conditions, as identified also from the results of the autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions. Four MWs, located in the northernmost area of the domain, are grouped in C8: the average trend of this cluster is comparable in its first part to the trend of C3, while the declining period from Mar15 is more oscillating than the linear declining phase of C3; thus, this second part of the trend is more comparable to C5 trend. The average hydraulic head variation is around 7–8 m.
Water table and groundwater volumes calculation
Groundwater potentiometric maps of the shallow aquifer for the identified groundwater level minimum and maximum conditions (Sep07, Mar15) and for Sep19 are shown in Fig. 10a–c and their raster differences are displayed in Fig. 10d,e. As observable in Fig. 10d, in the northern portion of the domain, characterized by a steeper rising trend (Fig. 4) and a wide unsaturated zone (Fig. 2), hydraulic heads (m asl) differed by more than 10 m between the minimum and maximum conditions, while in the NW this difference was limited to around 4 m. Moving south, the difference values oscillated between 3 and 5 m close to the downtown area; in the south and west, the differences in hydraulic heads were between zero and 2 m, confirming a reduced/not significant rising trend. In these areas, despite Sep07 being identified as the groundwater level minimum, in a few locations, the hydraulic head of Sep07 was higher than Mar15, which could be due to the irrigation activities generating a groundwater maximum at the end of the summer season. Moreover, as the unsaturated zone of the southern part of the shallow aquifer is thinner than in the northern part (Fig. 2), groundwater level oscillations are limited, and the groundwater minimum and maximum conditions are less evident. On the other hand, the eastern side of the domain shows different behaviour, with a global groundwater maximum higher than the global minimum. As regards the Mar15–Sep19 investigation (Fig. 10e), hydraulic head differences appeared limited with respect to the Mar15–Sep07 analysis (Fig. 10d). In the north, the hydraulic head differences did not exceed 6 m, with 3 m as the maximum difference observable near the downtown area, while a similarly limited oscillation was detected for the southern sector, if compared to the Mar15–Sep07 analysis. With respect to the western portion, hydraulic heads of Sep19 were generally higher than in Mar15, despite Sep19 coming at the end of a declining trend period. In terms of subsurface volumes impacted by these groundwater oscillations, the rising trend between Sep07 and Mar15 determined an occupation of 704.94 × 106 m3. In contrast, the declining phase that took place from Mar15 onward determined a reduction of 289.62 × 106 m3 of groundwater in the shallow aquifer. As for the mobile water included in these volumes, eight classes of effective porosity have been introduced for the calculation, deriving their values from the hydraulic conductivity values of the lithologies in these subsurface portions. A detailed description of these classes (ne) has been provided in Table 1.
Effective porosity values ranging from 0.18–0.19 have been attributed to fine grain-size materials (hydraulic conductivity (K) ranging from 38 to 70 m/s), while higher values have been assigned respectively to medium-grain (0.20–0.22, with K from 71 to 160 m/s) and coarse materials (0.23–0.25, with K from 161 to 262 m/s).
Based on this classification, for the Sep07–Mar15 period there has been an estimated increase of 149.53 × 106 m3 of mobile water, while for the Mar15–Sep19 period, a decrease of 62.69 × 106 m3.
Discussion
As planned by the local authorities (Milan Metropolitan City 2019), in the framework of a general urban transformation, urban underground development is occurring for the city of Milan. This implies an integrated management scheme, taking groundwater aspects into account. Thus, a data-driven methodology was adopted in this study to identify groundwater management areas (MAs) and elaborate management proposals for the underground infrastructure. In particular, greater attention has been paid to public car parks. To do so, a set of statistical and geospatial techniques, which are scientifically appropriate, has been adopted to assess spatial-temporal patterns of groundwater levels (Chaudhuri and Ale 2014).
Improved conceptual model
The obtained results showed a general spatial agreement, identifying different hydrogeologic features among various domain sectors. The northern sector showed the highest trend magnitude (Fig. 4): in this area, the greater unsaturated thickness (Fig. 2) allows the water table to oscillate widely. This hydrogeologic condition facilitated the groundwater rebound that started at the beginning of the 1990s, triggered by both the industrial decommissioning and a gradual decrease in the resident population (Bonomi 1999; De Caro et al. 2020). In the same sector, the autocorrelation coefficient turned out to be significant at up to six lags, implying a long-term memory of the system and a significant dependency from previous measures (Dinpashoh et al. 2014; Neto et al. 2016). The downtown sector showed a lower trend magnitude than the northern sector. This lower trend can depend on a possible anthropogenic influence associated with extensive use of GWHPs and a significant presence of underground infrastructure controlling groundwater levels. These areas showed a delayed response to precipitation events, with a significant correlation at lag –1 (response time: 6 months): this could be due to (1) the greatest depth of the water table (Fig. 2), mainly in the north, which determines a delayed groundwater response, and (2) a reduced infiltration rate dependent on an urbanized land use, visible for both sectors (Fig. 4). These factors contributed also to a delayed identification of reversal points, as occurred for the groundwater minimum: in the north this condition was in part identified in Mar08 (Fig. 5b), and not in Sep07 as for the majority of the time series (Fig. 5a).
In the south, depending on its hydraulic gradient, the water table is close to the ground level (Fig. 2), which limits the rising trend. Moreover, as for the western sector, a decrease in grain size from coarse (i.e. gravel and sand) to fine sediments (i.e. silt and clay), moving from N to S, determines a change in the aquifer transmissivity, which leads to the formation of the lowland springs, forcing groundwater both close to the ground level and to outflow, thus constraining water-table oscillations (De Luca et al. 2014). Furthermore, in the west, the presence of clay lenses determines the formation of local perched aquifers, with a medium depth ranging from 6–8 m below the ground level (Bonomi et al. 2009). Western time series are also marked by the presence of seasonal fluctuations (Fig. 9b), with a groundwater level minimum in March and a maximum in September. Land use could influence this cyclical condition. This area is mainly agricultural (Fig. 4), with maize and rice as primary cultures (Bernini et al. 2019; Pulighe and Lupia 2019): as the irrigation period goes from April to September, a groundwater level maximum is expected at the end of this season, with a water-table response generally delayed by less than 1 month compared to the beginning of the flooding activities (Lasagna et al. 2020). All these factors could explain the reduced significant autocorrelation in the south and the almost complete absence of autocorrelation in the west, highlighting a lack of system memory in these areas and a rapid response to external drivers. The significant cross-correlation with rain data at lag 0, providing insights into a rapid aquifer recharge by rainfall (Lasagna et al. 2020), is in line with these outcomes. This aspect also appeared from reversal points analysis, as in these areas the identified groundwater level minimum and maximum condition partly occurred in advance from Sep07 (groundwater minimum) and Mar15 (groundwater maximum) (Fig. 5).
The widespread correlation at lag –2 (response time: 1 year) could be attributed, in particular for these peripheral sectors of the domain, to a sort of periodicity of groundwater time-series, mainly attributable to the agricultural activities that led to a cyclical hydraulic maximum at the end of the summer season.
In contrast, different hydrogeologic settings could explain the discrepancy in correlation results between western and eastern sectors (Fig. 7a), as land use distribution is mostly similar. In the east, the paleochannel of the Lambro River (Fig. 1), with coarse materials and a higher transmissivity, determines a difference from the geological system of the lowland springs and the local perched aquifers previously described for the western sector, influencing correlation results.
These findings highlighted that the degree of autocorrelation influences the slope magnitude of groundwater level trends. In addition, the thickness of the unsaturated zone was revealed to be a contributory factor to MWs autocorrelation (Bloomfield and Marchant 2013). As regards cross-correlation with rain data, results pinpointed that lag times between the groundwater level responses to precipitation events are related to the lithological conditions and the thickness of the unsaturated zone (Kotchoni et al. 2019). Moreover, land use distribution could be considered as an additional factor influencing the infiltration rate (Scanlon et al. 2005).
The final grouping of groundwater time series in eight clusters is consistent with the results previously described. Northern time series are grouped into C3, C5 and C8: these time series both show the highest trend magnitude and the highest degree of autocorrelation; moreover, their correlation with rain data is uniformly delayed (lag –1). In addition, their water table rising, of between 8 and 10 m, was the greatest detected. This trend proves the anthropogenic impact (Bloomfield et al. 2015), representing the ending phase of the groundwater rebound, triggered by the industrial decommissioning that started at the beginning of the 1990s (Bonomi 1999). The same explanation provided for the northern clusters could be provided even for C2, grouping MWs located at the transition belt between the northern clusters and C4. This latter cluster groups all the groundwater time series located in the downtown belt, showing both a dampened magnitude of trend and degree of autocorrelation compared to the northern MWs. C1 includes all the southern MWs, with a part of them stretching up to the downtown area; this spatial distribution could depend both on a structural and anthropogenic factor. The structural factor is due to the constrained possibility of oscillations of the water table in this part of domain; the anthropogenic influence could be attributed to the groundwater exploitation for heat exchange; GWHPs active in the downtown area, mainly inducing a thermal stress, could be considered as nonconsumptive (García-Gil et al. 2016), as by using a system of catch and return wells, the water withdrawn is usually returned to the shallow aquifer. C6 and C7 group all the MWs located in the western area; as discussed previously, the fluctuating but constrained groundwater level trend of these MWs could be related both to the presence of lowland springs and local perched aquifers and to the land use, with irrigation activities conducted during the summer season. Thus, also cluster analysis emphasized that, even within the same aquifer, and in a rather limited domain, significant differences in groundwater behaviour could be identified.
The outcomes of the data-driven approach have also been confirmed by the spatial analysis, applied to reconstruct the potentiometric maps of different groundwater conditions and to calculate the subsurface volumes influenced by these groundwater oscillations. In the north, where the highest trend magnitude (Fig. 4) and degree of correlation were detected (Fig. 7), the major groundwater hydraulic head variations have also been identified using GIS. Subsequently, a progressive dampening in water-table oscillations has been registered moving both southward and westward, where a reduction in trend magnitude (Fig. 4) and degree of correlation (Fig. 7) was observed, while a more rapid correlation with rainfall data was identified (Fig. 8a). Moreover, the content of mobile water included in these subsurface volumes has been estimated. This information could be useful for stakeholders, as in groundwater rising phases part of this amount of water could represent a flooding threat to underground structures; for this reason, this water could be locally withdrawn to secure the infrastructure at risk, exploiting this resource for other needs (i.e. street washing, recreational uses).
Considerations on the data-driven approach
This agreement among the obtained results allowed this study to focus on the effectiveness of a data-driven approach. Groundwater-level time series have been analysed, applying different statistical techniques—each one was employed to investigate a specific hydrogeologic aspect; however, in the end, the final outcomes obtained always showed spatially coherent regions of groundwater behaviour. Thus, time-series analysis provided a deep insight into the main hydrogeologic features of the shallow groundwater system, highlighting fundamental properties that affect groundwater level dynamics (Bloomfield et al. 2015); applying them to support groundwater system conceptualization could guarantee both time- and cost-effective assistance to groundwater models (Obergfell et al. 2013), providing useful complementary information. Besides, even if for many groundwater questions an answer could be obtained only by structuring a spatial groundwater model (Anderson et al. 2015), time-series analysis can still have a relevant role (Bakker and Schaars 2019)—for example, in data preprocessing and target definition.
In particular, through the approach developed in R to identify groundwater conditions, the highest number of reversal points was identified for the western and southern time series (Table S2 of the ESM), which proved the absence of a clear significant trend, evidencing a more fluctuating behaviour if compared to the most visible rising and declining phases detectable in the northern and central sectors. This outcome is consistent with the hydrogeologic framework described through the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator. Thus, the adopted approach turned out to be reliable in identifying the main groundwater conditions typical of the considered shallow aquifer, also identifying local situations.
As regards cross-correlation, combining groundwater-level time series and precipitation data provided a better understanding of at least one natural forcing on groundwater trends (Kumar et al. 2009). The adoption of just one meteorological station was a direct consequence of a lack of data and fragmentation, which is still a limiting factor as regards the potential use of Open Data information (Janssen et al. 2012). However, as the study area is a limited domain, located in the middle of an alluvial plain, a rather homogeneous rainfall trend over the area is presumable, considering that only one weather station was believed to have obtained reliable results. Depending on data availability, future perspectives could consider using a higher number of meteorological stations to strengthen this analysis.
Finally, grouping groundwater time series through cluster analysis techniques, focusing on groundwater levels, constitutes an emerging research field (Naranjo-Fernández et al. 2020). In particular, its application represents an element of novelty for the study area: in fact, statistical techniques in this domain have been mostly applied for groundwater chemicals (Alberti et al. 2016; Azzellino et al. 2019; Pollicino et al. 2019) and thermal issues (Previati and Crosta 2021b), but not for quantitative analysis. Additionally, the adopted approach allowed for the accurate pinpointing of the potential features influencing groundwater levels (i.e. geology, precipitation, withdrawals, land use), thus evidencing more defined local groundwater conditions. Moreover, their application in an urban planning framework is supposed to guarantee better policy outcomes. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that data-driven analysis of groundwater levels have been adopted in supporting underground infrastructure management, and this approach could help stakeholders in effectively designing the already planned urban underground development that will take place in the next years for the city of Milan, considering also groundwater aspects.
Decision management
In view of the previous results, which showed a similar spatial zoning, four management areas (MAs) have been identified (Fig. 11). Each area showed distinct local hydrogeologic behaviour, thus all need different management policies regarding urban groundwater management and urban planning. In order to elaborate effective guidelines for the management and construction of new public car parks, an already defined spatial methodology has been previously adopted to evaluate how their interference with the water table in terms of flooding (not submerged, possibly critical, submerged) has varied over time. The methodology has been fine-tuned with respect to a previous work (Sartirana et al. 2020), introducing a threshold value that allows one to identify potentially submerged infrastructures (i.e. possibly critical structures). Given the total number of 126 car parks, 35 car parks are located in MA1; 54 and 30 car parks are respectively sited in MA2 and MA3, while only 7 are in MA4. The results of the spatial relationship between public car parks and the water table have been summed up in Table 2 and are visible in Fig. 11. The MA for each public car park is found in Table S1 of the ESM.
Thus, car park submersion mainly occurred in MA2, followed by MA3. This depends also on the depth of these structures—in the downtown area (MA2), car parks can reach up to six floors (i.e. 20 m of depth); in contrast, in the northern sector (MA1) car parks have a medium depth of two–three floors (i.e. 8–11 m of depth), while one floor (i.e. 5 m) is typical in the western sector (MA4). Finally, car parks located in MA3 range from one to two floors in the southernmost part, and up to five floors in the northernmost part, at the border with MA2 (Sartirana et al. 2020). Thus, MA3 also presented recurring impacted car parks, due to both the number of floors and the proximity of the water table to the ground level (Fig. 2). Finally, MA1 did not show any impact for Sep07 (Fig. 11a) and Sep19 (Fig. 11c), while some parks results were noted as being possibly critical with respect to flooding in Mar15 (Fig. 11b), as a consequence of the steep water-table rise occurring in the northern sector. Even if the unsaturated thickness is high (Fig. 2), adopting proper management measures would be recommended. As for MA4, the worst condition has been detected in Sep19, because of the seasonal water-table fluctuations in this sector (Fig. 9b), determining a local groundwater level maximum for the end of the summer. As a consequence of these results, a list of suggested guidelines regarding the construction of new public car parks has been elaborated. These guidelines, together with the hydrogeologic features and the possibility of submersion for each MA, are summarized in Table 3.
In the past, some underground structures have been designed without waterproofing, neglecting the possibility of a groundwater rebound. Consequently, in the last decades, there have been flooding episodes in some public car parks (Sartirana et al. 2020). For this reason, a general guideline on the adoption of waterproofing techniques for new underground infrastructure has been proposed, acting as a reminder for the administrators. Based on local hydrogeologic conditions, a suggested number of floors has been provided for new public car parks for MA1, MA3, and MA4. A maximum of two floors has been indicated only for MA1, aiming to avoid possible interactions with the water table. A similar proposal has not been developed for MA2, as the majority of the economic activities are located in the city centre. This supposes a high demand for new infrastructure due to socio-economic needs (Bobylev 2009), and considers that the already-in-place structures are developed as multistorey, specific guidelines have been elaborated considering an interaction with the water table. In particular, pumping systems, including the adoption of GWHPs, could be favoured to control the water-table rise, regulating the withdrawals based on regular monitoring of the interaction between groundwater and the underground infrastructure. Moreover, in order to assess the impact of the underground infrastructure on groundwater (Attard et al. 2017), local 3D numerical models should be developed. In this way, a sustainable and integrated management scheme will be developed, balancing the needs of both a secure groundwater resource and underground infrastructure.
Conclusions and future perspectives
This work aimed at proposing a data-driven approach to support decision-based management for urban planning of new underground infrastructure, focusing on public car parks. To facilitate this, a time-series analysis of groundwater-level time series of the shallow aquifer beneath the city of Milan has been conducted, as interaction with groundwater has been observed in the last decades, resulting in the adoption of targeted management strategies in the urban planning framework becoming necessary. In particular, this study has allowed this paper to:
-
1.
Define a workflow of different statistical and geospatial techniques that allows one to evaluate the spatio-temporal patterns of the groundwater levels for the studied shallow aquifer, proving the effectiveness of a data-driven approach.
-
2.
Identify portions of the study area showing different groundwater conditions, mainly attributable to local hydrogeologic settings. Indeed, even in spatially limited domains, a thorough monitoring network could guarantee a broad insight into groundwater processes. Thus, different groundwater management strategies should be adopted according to specific hydrogeologic situations.
-
3.
Provide decision-makers a (site-specific) methodology to adequately design and handle the planned underground development of the city of Milan, also considering groundwater aspects. In particular, as a main outcome of this study, four areas of groundwater/underground-infrastructure integrated management options have been identified, whereby different guidelines for managing and designing new underground public car parks are recommended for adoption.
In order to properly design urban groundwater management strategy, this approach could be complementary to groundwater numerical modelling. Indeed, analysing groundwater-level time series could allow one to improve the definition of the conceptual model, and to identify local hydrogeologic conditions to be further studied through the development of a specific numerical model. Future perspectives will consider the realization of different groundwater scenarios, simulating possible climate change effects, to evaluate the dynamics of the interferences between groundwater and the underground structures, thus updating when required the suggested guidelines. The adopted methodology could be extended worldwide to other urban areas that have a well-structured groundwater monitoring network, are impacted by an existing interaction between groundwater and the underground infrastructure, and may face future underground development.
Change history
25 August 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
References
Alberti L, Azzellino A, Colombo L, Lombi S (2016) Use of cluster analysis to identify tetrachloroethylene pollution hotspots for the transport numerical model implementation in urban functional area of Milan, Italy. Int Multidiscip Sci GeoConference SGEM 1:723–729
Anand B, Karunanidhi D, Subramani T, Srinivasamoorthy K, Suresh M (2020) Long-term trend detection and spatiotemporal analysis of groundwater levels using GIS techniques in Lower Bhavani River basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Dev Sustain 22(4):2779–2800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00318-3
Anderson MP, Woessner WW, Hunt RJ (2015) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic, San Diego
Attard G, Winiarski T, Rossier Y, Eisenlohr L (2015) Review: Impact of underground structures on the flow of urban groundwater. Hydrogeol J 24(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1317-3
Attard G, Rossier Y, Winiarski T, Eisenlohr L (2017) Urban underground development confronted by the challenges of groundwater resources: guidelines dedicated to the construction of underground structures in urban aquifers. Land Use Policy 64:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.015
Azzellino A, Colombo L, Lombi S, Marchesi V, Piana A, Merri A, Alberti L (2019) Groundwater diffuse pollution in functional urban areas: the need to define anthropogenic diffuse pollution background levels. Sci Total Environ 656:1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.416
Bakker M, Schaars F (2019) Solving groundwater flow problems with time series analysis: you may not even need another model. Groundwater 57(6):826–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12927
Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR (1988) The New S Language. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA
Beretta GP, Avanzini M, Pagotto A (2004) Managing groundwater rise: experimental results and modelling of water pumping from a quarry lake in Milan urban area (Italy). Environ Geol 45(5):600–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0918-7
Bernini A, Toure AL, Casagrandi R (2019) The time varying network of urban space uses in Milan. Appl Netw Sci 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0245-x
Best KB, Miro ME, Kirpes RM, Kaynar N, Najera Chesler A (2021) Data-driven decision support tools for assessing the vulnerability of community water systems to groundwater contamination in Los Angeles County. Environ Sci Policy 124(July):393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.015
Bloomfield JP, Marchant BP (2013) Analysis of groundwater drought building on the standardised precipitation index approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):4769–4787. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4769-2013
Bloomfield JP, Marchant BP, Bricker SH, Morgan RB (2015) Regional analysis of groundwater droughts using hydrograph classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(10):4327–4344. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4327-2015
Bobylev N (2009) Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s master plan: a case of urban underground space use. Land Use Policy 26(4):1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003
Bobylev N (2016) Transitions to a high density urban underground space. Procedia Eng 165:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.750
Bonomi T (1999) Groundwater level evolution in the Milan area: natural and human issues. IAHS-AISH Publ 259:195–202
Bonomi T (2009) Database development and 3D modeling of textural variations in heterogeneous, unconsolidated aquifer media: application to the Milan plain. Comput Geosci 35(1):134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.006
Bonomi T, Cavallin A, De Amicis M, Rizzi S, Tizzone R, Trefiletti P (1998) Evoluzione della dinamica piezometrica nell’area milanese in funzione di alcuni aspetti socio-economici [Evolution of the piezometric dynamics in the Milan area as a function of some socio-economic aspects]. In: Atti della Giornata Mondiale dell’Acqua “Acque Sotterranee: Risorsa Invisibile, Rome, Italy, 23 March 1998, pp 9–17
Bonomi T, Fumagalli L, Dotti N (2009) Fenomeno di inquinamento da solventi in acque sotterranee sfruttate ad uso potabile nel nord-ovest della provincia di Milano [Phenomenon of solvent pollution in groundwater exploited for drinking use in the north-west of Milan province]. Geol Appl 12:43–59
Bonomi T, Del Rosso F, Fumagalli L, Canepa P (2010) Assessment of groundwater availability in the Milan Province aquifers. Mem Descr della Cart Geol d’Italia 90:31–40
Bonomi T, Fumagalli L, Rotiroti M, Bellani A, Cavallin A (2014) The hydrogeological well database TANGRAM©: a tool for data processing to support groundwater assessment. Acque Sotter - Ital J Groundw 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7343/as-072-14-0098
Cavallin A, Bonomi T (1997) Application of a hydrogeological model to analyze and manage groundwater processes in the urban environment: a case study in the Milan area, Italy. In: Groundwater in the urban environment, vol I: problems, processes and management. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 91–96
Chae GT, Yun ST, Kim DS, Kim KH, Joo Y (2010) Time-series analysis of three years of groundwater level data (Seoul, South Korea) to characterize urban groundwater recharge. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 43(1):117–127. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/07-056
Chaudhuri S, Ale S (2013) Characterization of groundwater resources in the Trinity and Woodbine aquifers in Texas. Sci Total Environ 452–453:333–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.081
Chaudhuri S, Ale S (2014) Long-term (1930-2010) trends in groundwater levels in Texas: influences of soils, landcover and water use. Sci Total Environ 490:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.013
Cleveland RB, Cleveland WS, McRae JE, Terpenning I (1990) STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition. J Off Stat 6(1):3–73
Colombo L, Gattinoni P, Scesi L (2018) Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow for hazard assessment along the underground infrastructures in Milan (northern Italy). Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 79(May):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.05.007
de Brito Neto RT, Santos CAG, Mulligan K, Barbato L (2016) Spatial and temporal water-level variations in the Texas portion of the Ogallala Aquifer. Nat Hazards 80(1):351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1971-8
De Caro M, Crosta GB, Previati A (2020) Modelling the interference of underground structures with groundwater flow and remedial solutions in Milan. Eng Geol 272(May):105652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105652
De Luca DA, Destefanis E, Forno MG, Lasagna M, Masciocco L (2014) The genesis and the hydrogeological features of the Turin Po Plain Fontanili, typical lowland springs in northern Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0527-y
Dinpashoh Y, Mirabbasi R, Jhajharia D, Abianeh HZ, Mostafaeipour A (2014) Effect of short-term and long-term persistence on identification of temporal trends. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):617–625. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000819
Ducci D, Sellerino M (2015) Groundwater mass balance in urbanized areas estimated by a groundwater flow model based on a 3D hydrostratigraphical model: the case study of the eastern Plain of Naples (Italy). Water Resour Manag 29(12):4319–4333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1062-3
Filimonau V, Barth JAC (2016) From global to local and vice versa: on the importance of the ‘globalization’ agenda in continental groundwater research and policy-making. Environ Manage 58(3):491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0722-2
Frollini E, Preziosi E, Calace N, Guerra M, Guyennon N, Marcaccio M, Menichetti S, Romano E, Ghergo S (2021) Groundwater quality trend and trend reversal assessment in the European Water Framework Directive context: an example with nitrates in Italy. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11998-0
García-Gil A, Vázquez-Suñe E, Schneider EG, Sánchez-Navarro JÁ, Mateo-Lázaro J (2015) Relaxation factor for geothermal use development: criteria for a more fair and sustainable geothermal use of shallow energy resources. Geothermics 56:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.04.003
García-Gil A, Epting J, Ayora C, Garrido E, Vázquez-Suñé E, Huggenberger P, Gimenez AC (2016) A reactive transport model for the quantification of risks induced by groundwater heat pump systems in urban aquifers. J Hydrol 542:719–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.042
Gattinoni P, Scesi L (2017) The groundwater rise in the urban area of Milan (Italy) and its interactions with underground structures and infrastructures. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 62:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.001
George DJ (1992) Rising groundwater: a problem of development in some urban areas of the Middle East. In: Geohazards. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 171–182
Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford University Press, New York
Hayashi T, Tokunaga T, Aichi M, Shimada J, Taniguchi M (2009) Effects of human activities and urbanization on groundwater environments: an example from the aquifer system of Tokyo and the surrounding area. Sci Total Environ 407(9):3165–3172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.012
Hernández MA, González N, Chilton J (1997) Impact of rising piezometric levels on Greater Buenos Aires due to partial changing of water services infrastructure. In: Groundwater in the urban environment. Proceedings of the XXVII IAH Congress on Groundwater in the Urban Environment, Nottingham UK, 21–27 September 1997
Hirsch RM, Slack JR, Smith RA (1982) Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour Res 18(1):107–121
Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford Univ Press, New York
Istat (2011) L’italia del censimento: struttura demografica e processo di rilevazione, Lombardia [Italy in the census: demographic structure and survey process, Lombardy]. https://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/01/Lombardia_completo.pdf. Accessed May 2022
Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag 29(4):258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Judd AG (1980) The use of cluster analysis in the derivation of geotechnical classifications. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 17(4):193–211
Kendall MG (1948) Rank correlation methods. Hafner, Royal Oak, MI
Kitanidis PK (1997) Introduction to geostatistics: applications in hydrogeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Kotchoni DOV, Vouillamoz JM, Lawson FMA, Adjomayi P, Boukari M, Taylor RG (2019) Relationships between rainfall and groundwater recharge in seasonally humid Benin: a comparative analysis of long-term hydrographs in sedimentary and crystalline aquifers. Hydrogeol J 27(2):447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1806-2
Koziatek O, Dragićević S (2017) iCity 3D: A geosimulation method and tool for three-dimensional modeling of vertical urban development. Landsc Urban Plan 167(June):356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.021
Kumar S, Merwade V, Kam J, Thurner K (2009) Streamflow trends in Indiana: effects of long-term persistence, precipitation and subsurface drains. J Hydrol 374(1–2):171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.012
Lamé A (2013) Modélisation hydrogéologique des aquifères de Paris et impacts des aménagements du sous-sol sur les écoulements souterrains [Hydrogeological modeling of the Paris aquifers and impacts of subsoil development on underground flows]. BRGM/RP-62549-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France
Lasagna M, Mancini S, De Luca DA (2020) Groundwater hydrodynamic behaviours based on water table levels to identify natural and anthropic controlling factors in the Piedmont Plain (Italy). Sci Total Environ 716:137051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137051
Li F, Feng P, Zhang W, Zhang T (2013a) An integrated groundwater management mode based on control indexes of groundwater quantity and level. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3273–3292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0346-8
Li H-Q, Parriaux A, Thalmann P, Li X-Z (2013b) An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: deep city method, part 1—concept, process and application. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 38:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.010
Li H, Li X, Parriaux A, Thalmann P (2013c) An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: deep city method, part 2—case study for resource supply and project valuation. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 38:569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.009
ARPA Lombardia (2021) Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente [Regional environmental monitoring agency]. https://www.arpalombardia.it/. Accessed 13 April 2021
Lotti F, Borsi I, Guastaldi E, Barbagli A, Basile P, Favaro L, Mallia A, Xuereb R, Schembri M, Mamo JA, Sapiano M (2021) Numerically enhanced conceptual modelling (NECoM) applied to the Malta Mean Sea Level Aquifer. Hydrogeol J 29(4):1517–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02330-2
Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econom J Econom Soc :245–259
Meggiorin M, Passadore G, Bertoldo S, Sottani A, Rinaldo A (2021) Technical report assessing the long-term sustainability of the groundwater resources in the Bacchiglione basin (Veneto, Italy) with the Mann-Kendall test: suggestions for higher reliability. pp 35–48. https://doi.org/10.7343/as-2021-499
Milan Metropolitan City (2019) Documento di piano Milano 2030 Visione, Costruzione, Strategie, Spazi [Milan 2030 plan document vision, construction, strategies, spaces]. Milan Metropolitan City, Milan, Italy
Moritz S, Bartz-Beielstein T (2017) imputeTS: time series missing value imputation in R. R J 9(1):207–218. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2017-009
Mudd GM, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Wendelborn A (2004) A review of urban groundwater in Melbourne: Considerations for WSUD. In: WSUD 2004: cities as catchments. Proceedings of International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design. Engineers Australia, Canberra, Australia, 428 pp
Naranjo-Fernández N, Guardiola-Albert C, Aguilera H, Serrano-Hidalgo C, Montero-González E (2020) Clustering groundwater level time series of the exploited Almonte-Marismas aquifer in southwest Spain. Water (Switzerland) 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/W12041063
Neto DC, Chang HK, van Genuchten MT (2016)A mathematical view of water table fluctuations in a shallow aquifer in Brazil. Groundwater 54(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12329
Obergfell C, Bakker M, Zaadnoordijk WJ, Maas K (2013) Deriving hydrogeological parameters through time series analysis of groundwater head fluctuations around well fields. Hydrogeol J 21(5):987–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-0973-4
Parriaux A, Blunier P, Maire P, Tacher L (2007) The DEEP CITY Project: a global concept for a sustainable urban underground management. 11th ACUUS Int. Conf. ‘Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers’, Athens, Greece, September 2007, pp 255–260
Pathak AA, Dodamani BM (2019) Trend analysis of groundwater levels and assessment of regional groundwater drought: Ghataprabha River Basin, India. Nat Resour Res 28(3):631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9417-0
Patle GT, Singh DK, Sarangi A, Rai A, Khanna M, Sahoo RN (2015) Time series analysis of groundwater levels and projection of future trend. J Geol Soc India 85(2):232–242
Peterson TJ, Western AW, Cheng X (2018) The good, the bad and the outliers: automated detection of errors and outliers from groundwater hydrographs. Hydrogeol J 26(2):371–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1660-7
Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. J R Stat Soc Ser C Applied Stat 28(2):126–135
Pollicino LC, Masetti M, Stevenazzi S, Colombo L, Alberti L (2019) Spatial statistical assessment of groundwater PCE (tetrachloroethylene) diffuse contamination in urban areas. Water (Switzerland) 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061211
Pollicino LC, Colombo L, Alberti L, Masetti M (2021) PCE point source apportionment using a GIS-based statistical technique combined with stochastic modelling. Sci Total Environ 750:142366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142366
Previati A, Crosta GB (2021a) Regional-scale assessment of the thermal potential in a shallow alluvial aquifer system in the Po plain (northern Italy). Geothermics 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101999
Previati A, Crosta GB (2021b) Characterization of the subsurface urban heat island and its sources in the Milan city area, Italy. Hydrogeol J 29(7):2487–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02387-z
Pulighe G, Lupia F (2019) Multitemporal geospatial evaluation of urban agriculture and (non)-sustainable food self-provisioning in Milan, Italy. Sustain 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071846
R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org
Regione Lombardia (2016) Piano di Tutela ed Uso delle Acque (PTUA) [Water Protection and Use Plan (PTUA)]. Regione Lombardia, Milan, Italy
Regione Lombardia (2021a) Open Data Regione Lombardia. https://dati.lombardia.it/. Accessed 15 July 2021
Regione Lombardia (2021b) Geoportal of the Lombardy Region, Italy. http://www.geoportale.regione.lombardia.it/. Accessed 1 June 2021
Regione Lombardia & ENI Divisione AGIP (2002) Geologia degli acquiferi Padani della Regione Lombardia [Geology of the Padan aquifers of the Lombardy Region]. Regione Lombardia & ENI Divisione AGIP, Milan, Italy
Rinderer M, van Meerveld HJ, McGlynn BL (2019) From points to patterns: using groundwater time series clustering to investigate subsurface hydrological connectivity and runoff source area dynamics. Water Resour Res 55(7):5784–5806. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023886
Sartirana D, Rotiroti M, Zanotti C, Bonomi T, Fumagalli L, De Amicis M (2020) A 3D geodatabase for urban underground infrastructures: implementation and application to groundwater management in Milan metropolitan area. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100609
Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Stonestrom DA, Prudic DE, Dennehy KF (2005) Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob Chang Biol 11(10):1577–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01026.x
Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1379–1389
Singh A, Shekhar C, Jeyaseelan SAT (2015) Spatio-temporal analysis of groundwater resources in Jalandhar district of Punjab state, India. Sustain Water Resour Manag 1(3):293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0022-7
Sottani A, Meggiorin M, Ribeiro L, Rinaldo A (2020) Comparison of two methods for optimizing existing groundwater monitoring networks: application to the Bacchiglione Basin, Italy. 22nd EGU General Assembly, held online, 4–8 May, 2020, id. 8759
Sterling R, Admiraal H, Bobylev N, Parker H, Godard J-P, Vähäaho I, Rogers CDF, Shi X, Hanamura T (2012) Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas. Proc Inst Civ Eng Des Plan 165(4):241–254
Stevenazzi S, Masetti M, Beretta GP (2017) Groundwater vulnerability assessment: from overlay methods to statistical methods in the Lombardy Plain area. Acque Sotter - Ital J Groundw 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7343/as-2017-276
Tabari H, Nikbakht J, Shifteh Some’e B (2012) Investigation of groundwater level fluctuations in the north of Iran. Environ Earth Sci 66(1):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1229-z
Tamburini A, Menichetti M (2020) Groundwater circulation in fractured and karstic aquifers of the Umbria-Marche Apennine. Water (Switzerland) 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/W12041039
Triki I, Trabelsi N, Hentati I, Zairi M (2014) Groundwater levels time series sensitivity to pluviometry and air temperature: a geostatistical approach to Sfax region, Tunisia. Environ Monit Assess 186(3):1593–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3477-8
Un-Habitat (2012) State of the world’s cities 2008/9: harmonious cities. Routledge, New York
Vähäaho I (2016) An introduction to the development for urban underground space in Helsinki. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 55:324–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.001
Vázquez-Suñé E, Sánchez-Vila X, Carrera J, Marizza M, Arandes R (1997) Rising groundwater levels in Barcelona: evolution and effects on urban structures. In: Groundwater in the urban environment. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 267–271
Vázquez-Suñé E, Sánchez-Vila X, Carrera J (2005) Introductory review of specific factors influencing urban groundwater, an emerging branch of hydrogeology, with reference to Barcelona, Spain. Hydrogeol J 13(3):522–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0360-2
Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):236–244
Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Cross-correlation, co-regionalization, and co-kriging. In: Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Wilkinson W (1985) Rising groundwater levels in London and possible effects on engineering structures. IAHS-AISH Publ. 154, IAHS, Wallingford, UK, pp 145–157
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Metropolitana Milanese S.p.A for providing piezometric data for groundwater-level time-series reconstructions. The authors would like to thank the associate editor, Hamid Kardam Moghaddam and another anonymous reviewer for their comments, which helped to improve this article.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research did not receive external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 952 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sartirana, D., Rotiroti, M., Bonomi, T. et al. Data-driven decision management of urban underground infrastructure through groundwater-level time-series cluster analysis: the case of Milan (Italy). Hydrogeol J 30, 1157–1177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02494-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02494-5