Abstract
The number of scientific publications containing the words “sustainability” or “sustainable” has increased tremendously over the last years, but their origins in Germany are not equally distributed in space. The aim of the paper is to find out why sustainability research occurs strongly in some places and not in others. Four potential external influences on the choice of a scientist’s research topic are considered: 1) the interaction with the regional economy, 2) the attitude of the regional population, 3) path dependence in science as well as 4) the organizational circumstances provided by the university. In a mixed-method approach, regression analyses are complemented by qualitative interviews with scientists. The results show that the decision to conduct research on sustainability is in most cases based on a more private level. However, the perceived attitude towards sustainability in the broader public and in the researcher’s local surrounding also seem to be important.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and ‘lock-in’ by historical events. Econ J 99:116–131
Arundel A, Geuna A (2004) Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Econ Innov New Technol 13:559–580
Binder J, Schwengler B (2006) Neuer Gebietszuschnitt der Arbeitsmarktregionen im Raum Berlin und Brandenburg. Kritische Überprüfung der bisher gültigen Arbeitsmarktregionen und Vorschläge für einen Neuzuschnitt. IAB-Forschungsbericht Nr. 4/2006. IAB, Nürnberg
Blankenberg A‑K, Buenstorf G (2016) Regional co-evolution of firm population, innovation and public research? Evidence from the West German laser industry. Res Policy 45:857–868
Boschma R, Frenken K (2011) Technological relatedness and regional branching. In: Bathelt H, Feldmann MP, Kogler DF (eds) Beyond territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation. Routledge, London, pp 64–81
Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M (2013) The Emergence of New Industries at the Regional Level in Spain: A Proximity Approach Based on Product Relatedness. Econ Geo 89(1):29–51
Boucher G, Conway C, van der Meer E (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Reg Stud 37:887–897
Brenner T, Duschl M (2015) Causal dynamic effects in regional systems of technological activities: a SVAR approach. Ann Reg Sci 55:103–130
Brenner T, Capasso M, Duschl M, Frenken K, Treibich T (2017) Causal relations between knowledge-intensive business services and regional employment growth. Reg Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1265104
Broekel T, Binder M (2007) The regional dimension of knowledge transfers – a behavioral approach. Ind Innov 14:151–175
Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations, New York City
Bruneel J, D’Este P, Salter A (2010) Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Res Policy 39:858–868
Caniëls M, van den Bosch H (2011) The role of higher education institutions in building regional innovation systems. Pap Reg Sci 90:271–287
Chatterton P, Goddard J (2000) The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. Eur J Educ 35:475–496
Coad A, Cowling M, Siepel J (2012) Growth processes of high-growth firms in the UK. Nesta Working Paper 12/10.
Cooke P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G (1997) Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Res Policy 26:475–491
Creswell J (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.
David P (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75:332–337
D’Este P, Iammarino S (2010) The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Pap Reg Sci 89:335–350
D’Este P, Patel P (2007) University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res Policy 36:1295–1313
D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Transf 36:316–339
Deyle H, Grupp H (2005) Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: a methodological patent study of German districts. Res Policy 34:221–234
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123
Ferrer-Balas D, Adachi S, Banas S, Davidson CI, Hoshikoshi A, Mishra A, Motodoa Y, Onga M, Ostwald M (2008) An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. Int J Sustain High Educ 9:295–316
Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Transit 1:24–40
Grant A (2008) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol 93:48–58
Gunasekara C (2006) The generative and developmental roles of universities in regional innovation systems. Sci Public Policy 33:137–150
Gustin BH (1973) Charisma, recognition, and the motivation of scientists. Am J Sociol 78:1119–1134
Henning M, Stam E, Wenting R (2013) Path dependence research in regional economic development: cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Reg Stud 47:1348–1362
Hidalgo C, Klinger B, Barabasi A-L, Hausmann R (2007) The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science 317(5837):482–487
Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970
Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2:221–231
Kline SJ, Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N (eds) The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 275
Lam A (2011) What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Res Policy 40:1354–1368
Lozano R (2006) Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. J Clean Prod 14:787–796
Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6:395–437
Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Lassen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54:123–143
Moneta A, Entner D, Hoyer P, Coad A (2013) Causal inference by independent component analysis: theory and application. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 75:705–730
de Rassenfosse G, Williams R (2015) Rules of engagement: measuring connectivity in national systems of higher education. High Educ 70:941–956
Rheinberg F (2011) Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H (eds) Motivation und Handeln, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 365–388
Ruef A, Markard J (2010) What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 22(3):317–313
Sarabia-Altamirano G (2016) University-industry linkage and their interaction channels from the perspective of the academy, the industry and the public policies. Ciencia UAT 10:13–22
Sedlacek S (2013) The role of universities in fostering sustainable development at the regional level. J Clean Prod 48:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.029
Stephens JC et al (2008) Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(3):317–338
Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Manage Sci 50:835–853
Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Strambach S, Halkier H (2013) Reconceptualizing change. Path dependency, path plasticity and knowledge combination. Z Wirtschgeogr 57:1–14
Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34:689–709
Trencher GP, Yarima M, Kharrazi A (2013) Co-creating sustainability: cross-sector university collaborations for driving sustainable urban transformations. J Clean Prod 50:40–55
Trippl M, Sinozic T, Lawton Smith H (2012) The “third mission” of universities and the region: comparing the UK, Sweden and Austria. Paper to be presented at the 52nd European Congress of the RSAI, Bratislava, 21.–25. August 2012.
Uyarra E (2010) Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. Eur Plan Stud 18:1227–1246
Velazquez L, Munguia N, Sanchez M (2005) Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: an appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 6:383–391
Wilcox RR (2005) Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Witzel A (2000) Das problemzentrierte Interview. Forum Qual Sozialforsch 1:Art. 22
Zilahy G, Melanen M, Phillips VD, Sheffy J, Korhonen J (2009) The roles of academia in regional Sustainability initiatives. J Clean Prod 17:1053–1162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Additional data will be supplied by the author on request.
Appendix
Appendix
The universities (official university code in brackets) that are considered in the analyses are U Kassel (1), U Duisburg-Essen (8), U Paderborn (12), U Siegen (13), U Wuppertal (14), Fernuniversität Hagen (15), Charite—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (18), Europa-U Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) (19), Humboldt-Universität Berlin (20), U Rostock (26), U Greifswald (27), U Halle (30), U Magdeburg (31), U Leipzig (36), TU Dresden (37), TU Chemnitz (38), TU Bergakademie Freiberg (39), U Jena (49), U Bamberg (50), U Bayreuth (51), U Oldenburg (52), U Osnabrück (53), U Passau (54), Kath. U Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (55), Bauhaus-U Weimar (58), TU Ilmenau (59), U Erfurt (62), Jacobs University Bremen (Priv. H) (66), Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg (80), U der Bundeswehr München (81), Deutsche Hochschule der Polizei, Münster (91), Universität Vechta (96), U Lüneburg (99), U Kiel (100), U Lübeck (101), U Hamburg (102), U Göttingen (103), TU Hamburg-Harburg (104), U Bremen (105), U Bochum (108), U Bonn (109), U Düsseldorf (110), U Köln (111), U Münster (112), U Dortmund (113), U Bielefeld (114), Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln (115), U Frankfurt a.M. (116), U Gießen (117), U Marburg (118), U Trier (120), TU Kaiserslautern (121), U Mainz (122), Deutsche Universität für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer (123), U Freiburg i.Br. (124), U Heidelberg (125), U Konstanz (126), U Tübingen (127), U Koblenz-Landau (129), U Erlangen-Nürnberg (131), U München (132), U Würzburg (133), U Regensburg (134), U Augsburg (135), U des Saarlandes Saarbrücken (136), FU Berlin (138), TU Braunschweig (143), TU Clausthal (144), U Hannover (145), Zeppelin Universität Friedrichshafen (Priv. H) (146), TH Aachen (148), Priv. wiss. H Witten-Herdecke (149), TU Darmstadt (153), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)—Bereich Hochschule (158), U Stuttgart (159), TU München (163), TU Berlin (169), ESCP Europe Wirtschaftshochschule Berlin (Priv. H) (170), Medizinische H Hannover (173), Tierärztliche H Hannover (174), U Hohenheim (180), U Mannheim (181), U Ulm (182), U Potsdam (350), and Steinbeis-H Berlin (Priv. H) (796).
The complete results of the VAR analyses are given in the Table 8, 9, 10 and 11.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brenner, T., Pflitsch, G. The raise of publications on sustainability—a case study in Germany. Rev Reg Res 37, 189–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-017-0119-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-017-0119-6