Abstract
Sustainability science has emerged as a research program and a scientific trend that directs all efforts to promote transition of societies toward sustainability. The style of research proposed to tackle unsustainability issues should be characterized by the application of a systems approach, as well as transdisciplinarity, participation, generation of social learning and a problem-solving perspective. However, whether such traits are being actually implemented has not been determined. Furthermore, a mature science is expected to have coherent research typologies, besides a scientific community and shared theoretical assumptions and methodological prescriptions; such types or research on sustainability science is still unknown. This systematic review aimed at analyzing research papers on sustainability carried out in 2013. Three aspects were studied: the scientific community, the theoretical assumptions on the concept of sustainability and the methodological design. Results suggest that the scientific community comes from disciplines different to sustainability, the researchers tend not to define the concept of sustainability and among those who do, and there is a lack of shared assumptions. The present analysis also showed that research on sustainability has not implemented the methodological characteristics mentioned and coherent method typologies were not found. These aspects hinder sustainability science evolution and maturity, given the difficulty to construct theories and consolidate a scientific community that develops coherent methods on such grounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Even though the use of the term ‘sustainability science’ is relatively recent, the study of human–nature interactions is not. Human ecology already studied interactions between humans and their environments since 1920s (Hawley 1986).
References
Bettencourt, L., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. PNAS, 108(49), 19540–19545.
Brockhaus, S., Kersten, W., & Knemeyer, M. (2013). Where Do We Go From Here? Progressing Sustainability Implementation Efforts Across Supply Chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 167–182.
Brown, R. R., Deletic, A., & Wong, T. H. F. (2015). How to catalyze collaboration. Nature, 525, 315–317.
Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, t. (2012). Manual cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones. http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269.
Chalmers, A. (1999). ¿Qué es esa cosa llamada ciencia?. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. PNAS, 100(14), 8059–8061.
Claro, D. P., Laban Neto, S. A., & de Oliveira Claro, P. B. (2013). Sustainability drivers in food retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 365–371.
Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875–1885.
Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernandez-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4ta ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana.
Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., et al. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 69–82.
Jiménez, L. (2008). Desarrollo sostenible (2nd ed.). Madrid: Pirámide.
Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.
Kajikawa, Y., Tacoa, F., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014). Sustainability science: The changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 9, 431–438.
Kataria, A., Kataria, A., & Garg, R. (2013). Effective internal communication: a way Towards Sustainability. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 6(2), 46–52.
Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.
Kuhn, T. (2006). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Mexico DF: Fondo de cultura económica.
Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(1), 36–41.
Olayide, O. E., Popoola, L., Olaniyan, O., Dapilah, F., & Abudulai Issahaku, R. Y. (2013). Assessing the transition from survival to sustainability: case of wechiau community hippo sanctuary in upper west region of Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(10), 47–56.
Parisi, C. (2013). The Impact of Organisational Alignment on the Effectiveness of Firms Sustainability Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 71–97.
Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2(1), 77–84.
Salas-Zapata, W., & Rios-Osorio, L. (2013). Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 4(1), 101–111.
Sterman, J. (2012). Sustaining sustainability: Creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized world. In M. Weinstein & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability science: The emerging paradigm and the urban environment (pp. 21–58). New York: Springer.
Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135, 507–511.
Viaggi, D., Raggi, M., & Gomez y Paloma, S. (2013). Modelling and interpreting the impact of policy and price scenarios on farm-household sustainability: Farming systems vs. result-driven clustering. Environmental Modelling & Software, 43, 96–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salas-Zapata, W.A., Ríos-Osorio, L.A. & Cardona-Arias, J.A. Methodological characteristics of sustainability science: a systematic review. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 1127–1140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9801-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9801-z