Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological characteristics of sustainability science: a systematic review

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability science has emerged as a research program and a scientific trend that directs all efforts to promote transition of societies toward sustainability. The style of research proposed to tackle unsustainability issues should be characterized by the application of a systems approach, as well as transdisciplinarity, participation, generation of social learning and a problem-solving perspective. However, whether such traits are being actually implemented has not been determined. Furthermore, a mature science is expected to have coherent research typologies, besides a scientific community and shared theoretical assumptions and methodological prescriptions; such types or research on sustainability science is still unknown. This systematic review aimed at analyzing research papers on sustainability carried out in 2013. Three aspects were studied: the scientific community, the theoretical assumptions on the concept of sustainability and the methodological design. Results suggest that the scientific community comes from disciplines different to sustainability, the researchers tend not to define the concept of sustainability and among those who do, and there is a lack of shared assumptions. The present analysis also showed that research on sustainability has not implemented the methodological characteristics mentioned and coherent method typologies were not found. These aspects hinder sustainability science evolution and maturity, given the difficulty to construct theories and consolidate a scientific community that develops coherent methods on such grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even though the use of the term ‘sustainability science’ is relatively recent, the study of human–nature interactions is not. Human ecology already studied interactions between humans and their environments since 1920s (Hawley 1986).

References

  • Bettencourt, L., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. PNAS, 108(49), 19540–19545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, S., Kersten, W., & Knemeyer, M. (2013). Where Do We Go From Here? Progressing Sustainability Implementation Efforts Across Supply Chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. R., Deletic, A., & Wong, T. H. F. (2015). How to catalyze collaboration. Nature, 525, 315–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, t. (2012). Manual cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones. http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269.

  • Chalmers, A. (1999). ¿Qué es esa cosa llamada ciencia?. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. PNAS, 100(14), 8059–8061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claro, D. P., Laban Neto, S. A., & de Oliveira Claro, P. B. (2013). Sustainability drivers in food retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. USA: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernandez-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4ta ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., et al. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, L. (2008). Desarrollo sostenible (2nd ed.). Madrid: Pirámide.

  • Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Tacoa, F., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014). Sustainability science: The changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 9, 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kataria, A., Kataria, A., & Garg, R. (2013). Effective internal communication: a way Towards Sustainability. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 6(2), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (2006). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Mexico DF: Fondo de cultura económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olayide, O. E., Popoola, L., Olaniyan, O., Dapilah, F., & Abudulai Issahaku, R. Y. (2013). Assessing the transition from survival to sustainability: case of wechiau community hippo sanctuary in upper west region of Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(10), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, C. (2013). The Impact of Organisational Alignment on the Effectiveness of Firms Sustainability Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Zapata, W., & Rios-Osorio, L. (2013). Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 4(1), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (2012). Sustaining sustainability: Creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized world. In M. Weinstein & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability science: The emerging paradigm and the urban environment (pp. 21–58). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135, 507–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viaggi, D., Raggi, M., & Gomez y Paloma, S. (2013). Modelling and interpreting the impact of policy and price scenarios on farm-household sustainability: Farming systems vs. result-driven clustering. Environmental Modelling & Software, 43, 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Alfredo Salas-Zapata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salas-Zapata, W.A., Ríos-Osorio, L.A. & Cardona-Arias, J.A. Methodological characteristics of sustainability science: a systematic review. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 1127–1140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9801-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9801-z

Keywords

Navigation