Abstract
Purpose
Prosthetic infections, although relatively uncommon in hernia surgery, are a source of considerable morbidity and cost. The aims of this experimental study were to assess the influence of the morphological properties of the mesh on bacterial adherence in vitro. The morphological properties assessed were the polymer type, filament type, filament diameter, mesh weight, mean pore size, and the addition of silver chlorhexidine and titanium coatings. In addition, the study assessed the effect on bacterial adherence of adding a commonly used suture to the mesh and compared adherence rates to self-gripping mesh that does not require suture fixation.
Methods
Eight commercially sourced flat hernia meshes with different material characteristics were included in the study. These were Prolene® (Ethicon®), DualMesh® (Gore®), DualMesh® Plus (Gore®), Parietex™ ProGrip (Covidien™), TiMesh® Light (GfE Medical), Bard® Soft Mesh (Bard®), Vypro® (Ethicon®), and Omyra® (Braun®). Individual meshes were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus with a bacterial inoculum of 102 bacteria. To assess the effect of suture material on bacterial adhesion, a sterile piece of commonly used monofilament suture material (2.0 Prolene®, ZB370 Ethicon®) was sutured to selected meshes (chosen to represent different commonly used polymers and/or the presence of an antibacterial coating). Inoculated meshes were incubated for 18 h in tryptone soy broth and then analysed using scanning electron microscopy. A previously validated method for enumeration of bacteria using automated stage movement electron microscopy was used for direct bacterial counting. The final fraction of the bacteria adherent to the mesh was compared between the meshes and for each morphological variable. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the bacterial counts. Tukey’s test was used to determine the difference between the different biomaterials in the event the ANOVA was significant.
Results
Properties that significantly increased the mean bacterial adherence were the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene polymer (P < 0.001); multifilament meshes (P < 0.001); increased filament diameter (P < 0.001); increased mesh weight (P < 0.001); and smaller mean pore size (P < 0.001). In contrast, mesh coating with antibacterial silver chlorhexidine significantly reduced bacterial adhesion (S. epidermidis mean bacterial count 140.7 ± 19.1 SE with DualMesh® vs. 2.3 ± 1.2 SE with DualMesh® Plus, P < 0.001; S. aureus mean bacterial count 371.7 ± 22.7 SE with DualMesh® vs. 19.3 ± 4.7 SE with DualMesh® Plus, P = 0.002). The addition of 2.0 Prolene suture material significantly increased the mean number of adherent bacteria independent of the mesh polymer or mesh coating (P = 0.04 to <0.001).
Conclusion
The present study demonstrates the significant influence of the prosthetic load on bacterial adherence. In patients at increased risk of infection, low prosthetic load materials, i.e., lightweight meshes with large pores, may be beneficial. Furthermore self-fixing meshes, which avoid increasing the prosthetic load and antibacterial impregnated meshes, may have an advantage in this setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Frey DM, Wildisen A, Hamel CT, Zuber M, Oertli D, Metzger J (2007) Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein’s operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 94(1):36–41. doi:10.1002/bjs.5580
McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17(11):1778–1780. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8851-5
Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13(5):545–554
Yerdel MA, Akin EB, Dolalan S, Turkcapar AG, Pehlivan M, Gecim IE, Kuterdem E (2001) Effect of single-dose prophylactic ampicillin and sulbactam on wound infection after tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: the randomized, double-blind, prospective trial. Ann Surg 233(1):26–33
Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1045–1051
An YH, Friedman RJ (1998) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 43(3):338–348. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<338:AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-B
Morra M, Cassinelli C (1997) Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 9(1):55–74
Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF (2004) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria–material interactions. Eur Cell Mater 8:37–57 (pii: vol008a05)
Kumar S (1999) Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 86(11):1482
Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11(1):3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01014.x
Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN (2012) Prosthetic mesh materials used in hernia surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(2):159–179. doi:10.1586/erd.11.65
Aydinuraz K, Agalar C, Agalar F, Ceken S, Duruyurek N, Vural T (2009) In vitro S. epidermidis and S. aureus adherence to composite and lightweight polypropylene grafts. J Surg Res 157(1):e79–e86. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.008
Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Foster M, Burns JM, Kuwada TS, Heniford BT (2006) In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Hernia 10(2):120–124. doi:10.1007/s10029-005-0056-0
Nyame TT, Lemon KP, Kolter R, Liao EC (2011) High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1061–1068. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b65af
Duarte PM, Reis AF, de Freitas PM, Ota-Tsuzuki C (2009) Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. J Periodontol 80(11):1824–1832. doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090273
Henry-Stanley MJ, Shepherd MM, Wells CL, Hess DJ (2010) Selected factors affecting Staphylococcus aureus within silastic catheters. J Surg Res 161(2):202–208. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.07.025
van Heerden J, Turner M, Hoffmann D, Moolman J (2009) Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(5):610–617. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.044
Sanders DL, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2012) Design and validation of a novel quantitative method for rapid bacterial enumeration using programmed stage movement scanning electron microscopy. J Microbiol Methods 91(3):544–550. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2012.09.027
Banche G, Roana J, Mandras N, Amasio M, Gallesio C, Allizond V, Angeretti A, Tullio V, Cuffini AM (2007) Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(8):1503–1507. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066
Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP, Lewis BD, Brown KR, Towne JB (2006) Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? J Am Coll Surg 203(4):481–489. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026
Masini BD, Stinner DJ, Waterman SM, Wenke JC (2011) Bacterial adherence to suture materials. J Surg Educ 68(2):101–104. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.015
Champault G, Torcivia A, Paolino L, Chaddad W, Lacaine F, Barrat C (2011) A self-adhering mesh for inguinal hernia repair: preliminary results of a prospective, multicenter study. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0843-8
Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13(2):137–142. doi:10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4
Garcia Urena MA, Hidalgo M, Feliu X, Velasco MA, Revuelta S, Gutierrez R, Utrera A, Porrero JL, Marin M, Zaragoza C (2011) Multicentric observational study of pain after the use of a self-gripping lightweight mesh. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0811-3
Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I, Joachim A, Sandberg S, Koch T, Rulicke T (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. J Am Coll Surg 208(6):1107–1114. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.046
Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2012) An experimental study exploring the relationship between the size of bacterial inoculum and bacterial adherence to prosthetic mesh. Surg Endosc
Collins CH (2004) Collins and Lyne’s microbiological methods. In: Collins CH, et al., 8th edn. Arnold, London
Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An experimental study exploring the relationship between the size of bacterial inoculum and bacterial adherence to prosthetic mesh. Surg Endosc 27(3):978–985. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2545-4
An YH, Friedman RJ (2000) Handbook of bacterial adhesion: principles, methods, and applications. Humana, Totowa
Gottenbos B, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC, Nieuwenhuis P (2002) Pathogenesis and prevention of biomaterial centered infections. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13(8):717–722 (pii: 5094771)
Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2010) In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes. Ann Surg 251(1):133–137. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b61d9a
Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2008) Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br J Surg 95(8):1051–1059. doi:10.1002/bjs.6154
Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res 63(6):765–771. doi:10.1002/jbm.10449
Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B, Gruenbeck M, Bachleitner-Hofmann B, Mittlboeck M, Bergmann M (2010) Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg 34(7):1702–1709. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0543-z
Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Kalbaugh CL, Jones Y, Lokey JS (2009) Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh. Am Surg 75(9):762–767 (discussion 767–768)
Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D (1981) Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection. Ann Surg 194(1):35–41
Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schule S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Miserez M, Smeds S (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex ProGrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y
Haddad FS, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP, Duncan CP (2000) The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol 82(6):807–812
Lucke M, Schmidmaier G, Sadoni S, Wildemann B, Schiller R, Haas NP, Raschke M (2003) Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. Bone 32(5):521–531
Troy MG, Dong QS, Dobrin PB, Hecht D (1996) Do topical antibiotics provide improved prophylaxis against bacterial growth in the presence of polypropylene mesh? Am J Surg 171(4):391–393. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89616-X
Law NW (1990) A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. Acta Chir Scand 156(11–12):759–762
Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RK, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM (1993) Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176(1):18–24
Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Bujan J (2000) Ultrastructural alterations of polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses implanted in abdominal wall provoked by infection: clinical and experimental study. World J Surg 24(5):528–531 (discussion 532)
Bellon JM, Garcia-Carranza A, Garcia-Honduvilla N, Carrera-San Martin A, Bujan J (2004) Tissue integration and biomechanical behaviour of contaminated experimental polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants. Br J Surg 91(4):489–494. doi:10.1002/bjs.4451
Taylor SG, O’Dwyer PJ (1999) Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 86(4):562–565. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01072.x
Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133(4):378–382
Kinnari TJ, Esteban J, Martin-de-Hijas NZ, Sanchez-Munoz O, Sanchez-Salcedo S, Colilla M, Vallet-Regi M, Gomez-Barrena E (2009) Influence of surface porosity and pH on bacterial adherence to hydroxyapatite and biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Med Microbiol 58(Pt 1):132–137. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.002758-0
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanders, D., Lambie, J., Bond, P. et al. An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Hernia 17, 779–789 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1124-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1124-5