Skip to main content
Log in

The time profile of groin hernia recurrences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

If the pathogeneses of the development of a recurrence varies following the different methods of hernia repair, the time required to develop a recurrence could be expected to vary. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors affecting the time interval between the primary repair and the reoperation.

Methods

Data from the Swedish Hernia Register were used. Each year of the 5-year follow-up period was treated as a separate subgroup and merged together into one large group. For each risk factor, we performed a Cox proportional hazard analysis, testing for interactions between the year and the risk factor, with reoperation as the endpoint.

Results

Altogether, 142,578 repairs were recorded, of which 7.7% were performed on women. The mean age of the cohort was 59 years. The overall recurrence rate in the 5-year period was 4.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence following surgery for recurrent hernia occurred relatively early (P < 0.05).Recurrence also appeared early if postoperative complications were registered (P < 0.05). Recurrence after suture repair or laparoscopic repair appeared relatively early compared to recurrence following open mesh repair (P < 0.05). In a separate analysis, a relatively higher risk for early recurrence was seen for all sutured repairs compared to all mesh repairs (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The pathogenesis behind the development of recurrence probably differs depending on the technique applied during the hernia repair. The higher proportion of early recurrences following laparoscopic repair, suture repair and recurrent repair may be explained by the high proportion of technical failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 94:506–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:130–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Christensen IJ, Kehlet H (2007) Risk of recurrence 5 years or more after primary Lichtenstein mesh and sutured inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 94:1038–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen PL, Mertens PR, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2004) The biology of hernia formation. Surgery 136(1):1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordin P, Haapaniemi S, Kald A, Nilsson E (2003) Influence of suture material and surgical technique on risk of reoperation after non-mesh open hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1004–1008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamäki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P (2007) Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 245(4):656–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campanelli G, Pettinari D, Nicolosi FM, Cavalli M, Avesani EC (2006) Inguinal hernia recurrence: classification and approach. Hernia 10:159–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engström P, Gunnarsson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberöd A (1998) Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery. A three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10:309–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liem MSL, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJMV; Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237(1):136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nixon SJ, Jawaid H (2009) Recurrence after inguinal hernia repair at ten years by open darn, open mesh and TEP—no advantage with mesh. Surgeon 7(2):71–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swedish Hernia Register (2008) Home page at: http://www.svensktbrackregister.se. Accessed 1 Oct 2008

  14. Klinge U, Krones CJ (2005) Can we be sure that the meshes do improve the recurrence rates? Hernia 9:1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sevonius D, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Sandblom G (2009) Repeated groin hernia recurrences. Ann Surg 249:516–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikkelsen T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2002) Risk of femoral hernia after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 89:486–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Junge K, Peiper C, Schachtrupp R, Rosch R, Kürten D, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2003) Breaking strength and tissue elasticity after Shouldice repair. Hernia 7:17–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Magnusson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnusson, N., Nordin, P., Hedberg, M. et al. The time profile of groin hernia recurrences. Hernia 14, 341–344 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0648-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0648-1

Keywords

Navigation