Skip to main content
Log in

A “self adhering” prosthesis for hernia repair: experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic reinforcement is now routine in the management of inguinal and incisional hernia, and it significantly reduces the risk of recurrence. After surgery, chronic pain is often attributed to the characteristics of the mesh and to the method of fixation in the wound, with a potential risk of nerve or muscle injuries.

Aim

To evaluate the properties of a new “self adhering” prosthesis in an experimental animal study.

Materials and methods

The self adhering prosthesis, a lightweight (40 mg/m2) polypropylene mesh coated with a synthetic glue on one side, was implanted laparoscopically in pigs. Removal of the prosthesis was performed at one day, one week and one month post operatively. A macroscopic and microscopic evaluation was performed. The results, using a quantitative score, were compared to those of a control group using the same polypropylene mesh without glue, but fixed by staples.

Results

The operative time was significantly lower in the self adhering group: 23 min (15–32) versus 31 min (21–40) (P = 0.01). The average time interval from the introduction of the mesh into the preperitoneal space until the appearance of the first tough adhesion was 3 min (2–4). In the control group, the mesh handling time was 8.3 min (5–14) (P = 0.01). At the time of implantation, the score was at a maximum value in all cases for the self adhering prostheses, especially concerning handling and adhesiveness. Upon removal, this score was noted to be good or very good in 90–100% of the cases. There was a good integration in the muscle confirmed histologically, and there was no shrinkage, no mobilisation and no migration. At one month, the thickness of the fibrosis at the limits of the meshes was significantly higher for the self adhering prostheses (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

In this experimental study, the self adhering prosthesis demonstrated its adhesive properties and its ability to be well tolerated, with a good macroscopic and microscopic integration into the abdominal wound. This should allow us to perform a clinical prospective study in an open and laparoscopic approach with the double objective of reducing post operative pain induced by mechanical fixation and decreasing the cost of these procedures by reducing the operative time and by eliminating staple fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldridge AJ, Nehra D (2001) EU Hernia Trialist Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 88:471–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Israelson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L (2006) Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 10:258–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwab R, Willms A, Kröger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Walder N, Mittermayr R, Ohlinger W, Heinze A, Redl H (2007) Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair. Surg Endosc 21:1781–1785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Pisanelli MC, Bartoli A, Di Zitti L, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Stefanoni M, Patriti A (2008) Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case–control study. Surg Endosc 22(3):668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silen W (2002) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 89:123–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aasvang EK, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2006) Pain and functional impairment 6 years after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 10:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Olmi S, Scarini A, Erba L, Guaglio M, Croce E (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142:40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245(2):222–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Champault.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Champault, G., Polliand, C., Dufour, F. et al. A “self adhering” prosthesis for hernia repair: experimental study. Hernia 13, 49–52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0419-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0419-4

Keywords

Navigation