Skip to main content
Log in

Inguinal hernia: Challenging the traditional indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: It is generally accepted that most inguinal hernias should be operated on electively in order to avoid the high morbidity and mortality associated with incarceration and small bowel obstruction. The present study reassesses the indication for surgery in asymptomatic inguinal hernia patients. Methods: We analyzed profiles, separately, for elective and emergency inguinal herniorrhaphies and compared the morbidity and mortality rates. Results: Two hundred randomly selected elective hernia repairs were compared with 67 incarcerated cases. Postoperative complications were more common following emergency (23.9%) than elective repair (10.5%); however, in both groups, minor complications predominated. The mortality rate in the incarcerated group (6%) was clearly linked with a high preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. A bowel resection rate of 4.5% was found in the incarcerated cases, which was not correlated with mortality. Conclusions: Patients with asymptomatic inguinal hernia and unfavorable medical conditions should be recommended an elective repair, preferably under local anesthesia, to avoid the high mortality associated with an emergency operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akcakaya A, Alimoglu O, Hevenk T, Bas G, Sahin M (2000) Mechanical intestinal obstruction caused by abdominal wall hernias. Ulus Travma Derg 6:260–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Broll R, Weisser C, Muhlschlegel M (1987) Inguinal hernia in old age. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 112:641–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulah B, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Kulacoglu IH, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Emergency hernia repairs in elderly patients. Am J Surg 182:455–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis DC, Moran CG, Vellacott KD (1989) Inguinal hernia repair in the elderly. J R Coll Surg Edinb 34:101–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Millat B (1997) Treatment of inguinal hernia: indications. Rev Prat 47:268–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Post S (1997) Against the principle surgical indications in inguinal hernia. Chirurg 68:1256–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 25:835–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forte A, D’Urso A, Palumbo P, Lo Storto G, Gallinaro L, Bezzi M, Beltrami V (2003) Inguinal hernioplasty: the gold standard of hernia repair. Hernia 7:35–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurt N, Oncel M, Ozkan Z, Bingul S (2003) Risk and outcome of bowel resection in patients with incarcerated groin hernias: retrospective study. World J Surg 27:741–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harouna Y, Yaya H, Abdou I, Bazira L (2000) Prognosis of strangulated inguinal hernia in the adult: influence of intestinal necrosis. Apropos of 34 cases. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 93:317–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oishi SN, Page CP, Schwesinger WH (1991) Complicated presentations of groin hernias. Am J Surg 162:568–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nehme AE (1983) Groin hernias in elderly patients. Management and prognosis. Am J Surg 146:257–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberod A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg 163:823–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the post-repair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. The MRC laparoscopic groin hernia trial group, O’Dwyer PJ (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomized comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Report of a working party convened by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (1993) Clinical guidelines on the management of groin hernia in adults. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England

  17. Tingwald GR, Cooperman M (1982) Inguinal and femoral hernia repair in geriatric patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154:704–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (2001) One thousand consecutive inguinal hernia repairs under unmonitored local anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:1373–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gianetta E, de Cian F, Cuneo S, Friedman D, Vitale B, Marinari G, Baschieri G, Camerini G (1997) Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg 84:983–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berliner SD, Spier N (1998) Elective herniorrhaphy in the aged. Hernia 2:85–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Ohana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohana, G., Manevwitch, I., Weil, R. et al. Inguinal hernia: Challenging the traditional indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients. Hernia 8, 117–120 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0184-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0184-3

Keywords

Navigation