Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increasing Red Maple Leaf Litter Alters Decomposition Rates and Nitrogen Cycling in Historically Oak-Dominated Forests of the Eastern U.S.

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Without canopy-opening fire disturbances, shade-tolerant, fire-sensitive species like red maple (Acer rubrum L.) proliferate in many historically oak-dominated forests of the eastern U.S. Here, we evaluate potential implications of increased red maple dominance in upland oak forests of Kentucky on rates of leaf litter decomposition and nitrogen (N) cycling. Over 5 years, we evaluated mass loss of leaf litter and changes in total N and carbon (C) within six leaf litter treatments comprised of scarlet oak, chestnut oak, and red maple, and three mixed treatments of increasing red maple contribution to the leaf litter pool (25, 50, and 75% red maple). Over a 1.5-year period, we conducted a plot-level leaf litter manipulation study using the same treatments plus a control and assessed changes in net nitrification, ammonification, and N mineralization within leaf litter and upper (0–5 cm depth) mineral soil horizons. Red maple leaf litter contained more “fast” decomposing material and initially lost mass faster than either oak species. All litter treatments immobilized N during initial stages of decomposition, but the degree of immobilization decreased with decreasing red maple contribution. The leaf litter plot-level experiment confirmed slower N mineralization rates for red maple only plots compared to chestnut oak plots. As red maple increases, initial leaf litter decomposition rates will increase, leading to lower fuel loads and more N immobilization from the surrounding environment. These changes may reduce forest flammability and resource availability and promote red maple expansion and thereby the “mesophication” of eastern forests of the U.S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA. 1990. Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68:2201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams MD. 1992. Fire and the development of oak forests. BioScience 42:346–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams MD. 1998. The red maple paradox. BioScience 48:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams MD. 2005. Prescribing fire in eastern oak forests: is time running out? North J Appl For 22:190–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander HD, Arthur MA. 2010. Implications of a predicted shift from upland oaks to red maple on forest hydrology and nutrient availability. Can J For Res 40:716–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur MA, Alexander HD, Dey DC, Schweitzer CJ, Loftis DL. 2012. Refining the oak-fire hypothesis for management of oak-dominated forests of the eastern United States. J For 110:257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur MA, Paratley RD, Blankenship BA. 1998. Single and repeated fires affect survival and regeneration of woody and herbaceous species in an oak-pine forest. J Torrey Bot Soc 125:225–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton IW, Hyatt LA, Howe KM, Gurevitch J, Lerdau MT. 2005. Invasive species accelerate decomposition and litter nitrogen loss in a mixed deciduous forest. Ecol Appl 15:1263–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball BA, Hunter MD, Kominoski JS, Swan CM, Bradford MA. 2008. Consequences of non-random species loss for decomposition dynamics: experimental evidence for additive and non-additive effects. J Ecol 96:303–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair JM, Crossley DA Jr. 1988. Litter decomposition, nitrogen dynamics and litter microarthropods in a Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forest 8 years following clearcutting. J Appl Ecol 25:683–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair JM. 1988. Nutrient release from decomposing foliar litter of three tree species with spicial reference to calcium, magnesium and potassium dynamics. Plant Soil 110:49–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship BA, Arthur MA. 1999. Prescribed fire affects eastern white pine recruitment and survival on eastern Kentucky ridgetops. South J Appl For 23:144–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship BA, Arthur MA. 2006. Stand structure over 9 years in burned and fire-excluded oak stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Kentucky. For Ecol Manag 225:134–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boberg JB, Finlay RD, Stenlid J, Ekblad A, Lindahl BD. 2014. Nitrogen and carbon reallocation in fungal mycelia during decomposition of boreal forest litter. PLoS One 9:e92897.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54:677–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF. 2000. Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81:2359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SK, Newman GS. 2010. Biodiversity at the plant–soil interface: microbial abundance and community structure respond to litter mixing. Oecologia 162:763–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JH, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N et al. 2008. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, Denef K, Paul E. 2013. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Change Biol 19:988–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer W, Folman LB, Summerbell RC, Boddy L. 2005. Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:795–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney MT, Fernandez IJ, Simmons JA, Briggs RD. 1996. Red Maple and White Pine litter quality: initial changes with decomposition. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin/38/. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  • Finzi AC, Van Breemen N, Canham CD. 1998. Canopy tree–soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Canham CD. 1998. Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on net N mineralization in a southern New England forest. For Ecol Manag 105:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH. 2002. Species control variation in litter decomposition in a pine forest exposed to elevated CO2. Glob Change Biol 8:1217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster S, Conner G. 2001. Kentucky Climate Center. Department of Geography and Geology, Western Kentucky University.

  • Fox VL, Buehler CP, Byers CM, Drake SE. 2010. Forest composition, leaf litter, and songbird communities in oak-vs. maple-dominated forests in the eastern United States. For Ecol Manag 259:2426–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goins SM, Chapman JI, McEwan RW. 2013. Composition shifts, disturbance, and canopy-accession strategy in an oldgrowth forest of Southwestern Ohio, USA. Nat Areas J 33:384–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green SR, Arthur MA, Blankenship BA. 2010. Oak and red maple seedling survival and growth following periodic prescribed fire on xeric ridgetops on the Cumberland Plateau. For Ecol Manag 259:2256–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RA. 1993. Soil survey of Powell and Wolfe counties, Kentucky. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US9522838. Accessed 13 June 2014.

  • Hickman JE, Ashton IW, Howe KM, Lerdau MT. 2013. The native–invasive balance: implications for nutrient cycling in ecosystems. Oecologia 173:319–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer C, Trumbore S, Fröberg M, Cisneros Dozal LM, Zhang D, Xu X, Santos GM, Hanson PJ. 2010. Recent (<4 year old) leaf litter is not a major source of microbial carbon in a temperate forest mineral soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1028–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreye JK, Varner JM, Hiers JK, Mola J. 2013. Toward a mechanism for eastern North American forest mesophication: differential litter drying across 17 species. Ecol Appl 23:1976–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuddes-Fischer LM, Arthur MA. 2002. Response of understory vegetation and tree regeneration to a single prescribed fire in oak-pine forests. Nat Areas J 22:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer CG. 1984. Development of the red maple understory in northeastern oak forests. For Sci 30:3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan RW, Dyer JM, Pederson N. 2011. Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America. Ecography 34:244–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea WJ. 2000. The influence of acorn crops on annual variation in rodent and bird populations. Ecology 81:228–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD. 2008. The demise of fire and “mesophication” of forests in the eastern United States. BioScience 58:123–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC et al. 2007. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry DA, Oren R, Hart SC. 2008. Forest ecosystems. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CE. 2010. Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Abrams MD. 2002. Floristics and avian community structure: implications for regional changes in eastern forest composition. For Sci 48:267–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM. 2004. Leaf litter composition and community structure: translating regional species changes into local dynamics. Ecology 85:2519–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubino M, Dungait JAJ, Evershed RP, Bertolini T, De Angelis P, D’Onofrio A, Lagomarsino A, Lubritto C, Merola A, Terrasi F et al. 2010. Carbon input belowground is the major C flux contributing to leaf litter mass loss: evidences from a<sup>13</sup>C labelled-leaf litter experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1009–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rustad LE, Cronan CS. 1988. Element loss and retention during litter decay in a red spruce stand in Maine. Can J For Res 18:947–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SJ, Young LB, Miller GE. 1977. Evaluation of soil nitrogen mineralization potentials under modified field conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:74–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn CS, Arthur MA. 2003. Spatial variability in soil nutrient availability in an oak-pine forest: potential effects of tree species. Can J For Res 33:2321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wider RK, Lang GE. 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Joint Fire Science Program (01-3-3-14, 04-2-1-06) and would not have been possible without the field and laboratory help of Millie Hamilton, Jessi Lyons, Jamison Paul, Gretchen Carmean, Autumn Foushee, Michael Mahala, Stephen Bell, Amy Herberg, Adam Sovkoplas, Elizabeth Carlisle, and many others. We are also grateful to our collaborators at the U.S. Forest Service who assisted with field set-up and data collection, and to Megan Poulette, Matt Weand, and Ryan McEwan who provided insightful comments and suggestions throughout this study. This study (#14-09-011) is connected with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Alexander.

Additional information

Author Contributions

HDA designed the study, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript and MAA contributed to research design, assisted in data interpretation, and critically reviewed manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexander, H.D., Arthur, M.A. Increasing Red Maple Leaf Litter Alters Decomposition Rates and Nitrogen Cycling in Historically Oak-Dominated Forests of the Eastern U.S.. Ecosystems 17, 1371–1383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9802-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9802-4

Keywords

Navigation