Skip to main content
Log in

BAER Soil Burn Severity Maps Do Not Measure Fire Effects to Vegetation: A Comment on Odion and Hanson (2006)

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We comment on a recent Ecosystem paper by Odion and Hanson (Ecosystems 9:1177–1189, 2006), in which the authors claim that high severity fire is rare in the Sierra Nevada under current conditions. Odion and Hanson’s results are predicated on BAER soil burn severity maps, which are based primarily on fire effects to soil, not vegetation. Odion and Hanson, and we fear others as well, are misinformed as to the nature of the BAER severity mapping process, and proper applications of BAER soil burn severity maps. By comparing the BAER soil burn severity maps to a true vegetation burn severity measure (RdNBR) calibrated by field data, we show that the area in the high soil burn severity class for the three fires analyzed by Odion and Hanson is substantially less than the area of stand-replacing fire, and that BAER maps—especially hand-derived maps such as those from two of the three fires—also greatly underestimate the heterogeneity in vegetation burn severity on burned landscapes. We also show that, contrary to Odion and Hanson’s claims, Fire Return Interval Departure (FRID) is strongly correlated with fire severity in conifer stands within the perimeter of the McNally Fire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee JK. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington (DC): Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbe T, Finco MV, Quayle B, Lannom K, Sohlberg R, Parsons A. 2001. Field measurements for the training and validation of burn severity maps from spaceborne, remotely sensed imagery. Final project report, Joint Fire Sciences Program 2001–2

  • Bond WJ, van Wilgen BW. 1996. Fire and plants. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio A, Conover C, Keifer M, Lineback P. 2002. Fire management and GIS: a framework for identifying and prioritizing fire planning needs. Assoc Fire Ecol Misc Pub No. 1:102–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cissel JH, Swanson FJ, Weisberg PJ. 1999. Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecol Appl 9:1217–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvidge CD. 1990. Visible and near infrared reflectance characteristics of dry plant materials. Int J Rem Sens 11:1775–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRCC. 2005. Interagency fire regime condition class guidebook. Version 1.2. Available at: http://www.frcc.gov

  • Hann WJ, Strohm DJ. 2003. Fire regime condition class and associated data for fire and fuels planning: methods and applications. In: Omi PN, Joyce LA, Eds. Fire, fuel treatments and ecological restoration: conference proceedings. Proceedings RMRS-P-29. Fort Collins (CO): USDA-Forest Service. pp 397–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick P, Lachowski H, Griffith R, Parsons A. 2002. Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation (BAER): use of remote sensing and GIS. Assoc Fire Ecol Misc Pub No. 1:147–52

    Google Scholar 

  • James A, Bryant L, Schroder E, Loadholt S. 2000. Manter Fire soils report. 6 p, on file with the Sequoia National Forest, Porterville, CA, USA

  • Keifer M, Caprio A, Lineback P, Folger K. 2000. Incorporating a GIS model of ecological need into fire management planning. In: Neuenschwander LF, Ryan KC, Eds. Proceedings—crossing the millennium integrating spatial technologies and ecological principals for a new age in fire management. Moscow (ID): University of Idaho

  • Key CH, Benson NC. 2005. Landscape assessment (LA). Sampling and analysis methods. In: Lutes DC, Keane RE, Caratti JF, et al. Eds. FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system. General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-164. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokaly RF, Rockwell BW, Hiare SL, King TVV. 2007. Characterization of post-fire surface cover, soils, and burn severity at the Cerro Grande Fire, New Mexico, using hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing. Rem Sens Environ 106:305–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Thode AE. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Rem Sens Env (in press)

  • Morrison P, Swanson FJ. 1990. Fire history and pattern in a Cascade Range landscape. USDA-Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-254. Portland (OR): Pacific Northwest Research Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Odion DC, Hanson CT. 2006. Fire severity in conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecosystems 9:1177–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons A. 2002. Burn severity mapping. McNally Fire BAER Team, GIS and remote sensing information. 5 p, on file with the Sequoia National Forest, Porterville, CA, USA

  • Parsons A. 2003. Draft Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation (BAER) soil burn severity definitions and mapping guidelines. Salt Lake City (UT): USDA-Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons A, Orlemann A. 2002. BAER burn severity mapping methods and definitions. McNally Fire, Sequioa National Forest, July–August 2002. 3 page report on file with the Sequoia National Forest, Porterville, CA, USA

  • FRCC. 2005. Interagency fire regime condition class guidebook, version 1.2. Available at: http://www.frcc.gov

  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL. 1998. Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal variability in the American Southwest. J Climatol 11: 3128–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Beaty RM. 2005. Climatic influences on fire regimes in the northern Sierra Nevada mountains, Lake Tahoe Basin, Nevada, USA. J Biogeogr 32: 425–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thode AE. 2005. Quantifying the fire regime attributes of severity and spatial complexity using field and imagery data. PhD Dissertation. Davis (CA): University of California

  • USFS. 1995. Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation handbook. Forest Service Handbook 2509.13, Amendment No. 2509.13-95-7. Washington (DC): USDA-Forest Service

  • USFS. 2004. Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Record of Decision. Publication R5-MB-046. Vallejo (CA): USDA-Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region

  • Van Wagtendonk JW, Fites-Kaufman J. 2006. Sierra Nevada bioregion. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaufman J, Thode AE, Eds. Fire in California’s ecosystems. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp 264–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper benefited from conversations with and/or reviews by the following USFS-BAER team leaders and members: S. Anderson, T. Bettinger, T. Ellsworth, A. Gallegos, F. Linton, T. Kaplan-Henry, C. Kennedy, A. Orlemann, and B. Rust. Thanks also to the following for review and advice: B. Bahro, T. Caprio, J. Clark, J. Keeley, M. Keifer, E. Knapp, J. Moghaddas, and B. Schwind. We also gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh D. Safford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Safford, H.D., Miller, J., Schmidt, D. et al. BAER Soil Burn Severity Maps Do Not Measure Fire Effects to Vegetation: A Comment on Odion and Hanson (2006). Ecosystems 11, 1–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9094-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9094-z

Keywords

Navigation