Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: J. Solid State Electrochem. (2011) 15: 2095–2100DOI: 10.1007/s10008-011-1398-4
The authors regret an error made in this review (p. 2096).
The main proponents of the bridge-bonded formate pathway being dominant are the Osawa group (see Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1159 and references therein), whereas the Behm group (references as per the review) propose the dominant pathway is via adsorbed formic acid with the formate pathway contributing <25% of total current.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1398-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rees, N.V., Compton, R.G. Erratum to: Sustainable energy: a review of formic acid electrochemical fuel cells. J Solid State Electrochem 16, 419 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1614-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1614-2