Abstract
In this paper, we assessed the quantum mechanical level of theory for prediction of linear and nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of push-pull organic molecules. The electric dipole moment (μ), mean polarizability (〈α〉) and total static first hyperpolarizability (βt) were calculated for a set of benzene, styrene, biphenyl and stilbene derivatives using HF, MP2 and DFT (31 different functionals) levels and over 71 distinct basis sets. In addition, we propose two new basis sets, NLO-V and aNLO-V, for NLO properties calculations. As the main outcomes it is shown that long-range corrected DFT functionals such as M062X, ωB97, cam-B3LYP, LC-BLYP and LC-ωPBE work satisfactorily for NLO properties when appropriate basis sets such as those proposed here (NLO-V or aNLO-V) are used. For most molecules with β ranging from 0 to 190 esu, the average absolute deviation was 13.2 esu for NLO-V basis sets, compared to 27.2 esu for the standard 6-31 G(2d) basis set. Therefore, we conclude that the new basis sets proposed here (NLO-V and aNLO-V), together with the cam-B3LYP functional, make an affordable calculation scheme to predict NLO properties of large organic molecules.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng LT, Tam W, Marder SR, Stiegman AE, Rikken G, Spangler CW (1991) J Phys Chem 95:10643–10652
Cheng LT, Tam W, Stevenson SH, Meredith GR, Rikken G, Marder SR (1991) J Phys Chem 95:10631–10642
Delaire JA, Nakatani K (2000) Chem Rev 100:1817–1845
Hurst GJB, Dupuis M, Clementi E (1988) J Chem Phys 89:385–395
Kanis DR, Ratner MA, Marks TJ (1994) Chem Rev 94:195–242
Marder SR, Beratan DN, Cheng LT (1991) Sci 252:103–106
Miller TM, Bederson B (1988) Adv Atom Mol Phys 25:37–60
Ward JF, Miller CK (1979) Phys Rev A 19:826–833
Sekino H, Bartlett RJ (1993) J Chem Phys 98:3022–3037
Spackman MA (1989) J Phys Chem 93:7594–7603
Paschoal D, Costa MF, Junqueira GMA, Dos Santos HF (2009) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 913:200–206
Maroulis G (1996) J Phys Chem 100:13466–13473
Maroulis G (1998) J Chem Phys 108:5432–5448
Maroulis G (2003) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 633:177–197
Maroulis G (2003) J Chem Phys 118:2673–2687
Maroulis G (2007) Chem Phys Lett 442:265–269
Maroulis G (2010) Int J Quantum Chem 111:807–818
Maroulis G, Makris C, Xenides D, Karamanis P (2000) Mol Phys 98:481–491
Maroulis G, Menadakis M (2010) Chem Phys Lett 494:144–149
Haskopoulos A, Maroulis G (2010) J Phys Chem A 114:8730–8741
Maroulis G (2008) J Chem Phys 129:044314
Maroulis G, Karamanis P, Pouchan C (2007) J Chem Phys 126:154316
Rappoport D, Furche F (2010) J Chem Phys 133:134105
Suponitsky KY, Tafur S, Masunov AE (2008) J Chem Phys 129:044109
Boese AD, Martin JML (2004) J Chem Phys 121:3405–3416
Paschoal D, Costa MF, Junqueira GMA, Dos Santos HF (2010) J Comput Methods Sci Eng 10:239–256
Albert IDL, Marks TJ, Ratner MA (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:6575–6582
Marder SR, Perry JW, Bourhill G, Gorman CB, Tiemann BG, Mansour K (1993) Sci 261:186–189
Meyers F, Marder SR, Pierce BM, Bredas JL (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:10703–10714
Sim F, Chin S, Dupuis M, Rice JE (1993) J Phys Chem 97:1158–1163
Atalay Y, Avci D, Basoglu A (2008) Struct Chem 19:239–246
Buckingham AD, Orr BJ (1967) Q Rev 21:195–212
McLean AD, Yoshimine M (1967) J Chem Phys 47:1927–1935
Tsunekawa T, Yamaguchi K (1992) J Phys Chem 96:10268–10275
Frisch MJ et al (2009) Gaussian 2009 (Revision B.04). Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh
Frisch MJ, Head-Gordon M, Pople JA (1990) Chem Phys Lett 166:275–280
Frisch MJ, Head-Gordon M, Pople JA (1990) Chem Phys Lett 166:281–289
Head-Gordon M, Head-Gordon T (1994) Chem Phys Lett 220:122–128
Head-Gordon M, Pople JA, Frisch MJ (1988) Chem Phys Lett 153:503–506
Saebo S, Almlof J (1989) Chem Phys Lett 154:83–89
Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M (1980) Can J Phys 58:1200–1211
Adamo C, Barone V (1998) J Chem Phys 108:664–675
Lee CT, Yang WT, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868
Perdew JP, Chevary JA, Vosko SH, Jackson KA, Pederson MR, Singh DJ, Fiolhais C (1992) Phys Rev B 46:6671–6687
Handy NC, Cohen AJ (2001) Mol Phys 99:403–412
Becke AD (1988) Phys Rev A 38:3098–3100
Hamprecht FA, Cohen AJ, Tozer DJ, Handy NC (1998) J Chem Phys 109:6264–6271
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2006) J Chem Phys 125:194101
Van Voorhis T, Scuseria GE (1998) J Chem Phys 109:400–410
Boese AD, Handy NC (2002) J Chem Phys 116:9559–9569
Becke AD (1996) J Chem Phys 104:1040–1046
Rey J, Savin A (1998) Int J Quantum Chem 69:581–590
Wilson PJ, Bradley TJ, Tozer DJ (2001) J Chem Phys 115:9233–9242
Tao JM, Perdew JP, Staroverov VN, Scuseria GE (2003) Phys Rev Lett 91:1–4
Cohen AJ, Handy NC (2001) Mol Phys 99:607–615
Becke AD (1997) J Chem Phys 107:8554–8560
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ (1994) J Phys Chem 98:11623–11627
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Theor Chem Acc 120:215–241
Asawaroengchai C, Rosenblatt GM (1980) (1980) J Chem Phys 72:2664–2669
Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC (2004) Chem Phys Lett 393:51–57
Vydrov OA, Scuseria GE (2006) J Chem Phys 125:234109
Iikura H, Tsuneda T, Yanai T, Hirao K (2001) J Chem Phys 115:3540–3544
Grimme S (2006) J Chem Phys 124:034108
Feller D (1996) J Comput Chem 17:1571–1586
Schafer A, Horn H, Ahlrichs R (1992) J Chem Phys 97:2571–2577
Young DC (2001) Computational chemistry—a practical guide for applying techniques to real-world problems. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 233–234
Champagne B (1996) Chem Phys Lett 261:57–65
Bartkowiak W, Misiaszek T (2000) Chem Phys 261:353–357
Hansch C, Leo A, Taft RW (1991) Chem Rev 91:165–195
Koga T, Saito M, Hoffmeyer RE, Thakkar AJ (1994) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 306:249–260
Thakkar AJ, Koga T, Saito M, Hoffmeyer RE (1993) Int J Quantum Chem 48:343–354
Neto AC, Muniz EP, Centoducatte R, Jorge FE (2005) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 718:219–224
Sadlej AJ (1988) Collect Czech Chem Commun 53:1995–2016
Sadlej AJ (1991) Theor Chim Acta 79:123–140
NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101. http://cccbdb.nist.gov. Accessed 13 July 2011.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Brazilian agencies CNPq, CAPES, and FAPEMIG for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 844 kb)
Table S1 includes the electric dipole of polarizability (α, a.u.) for all atoms at Hartree-Fock level. Tables S2, S3, S4 and S5 include the calculated values for electric dipole moment (μ), average polarizability (〈α〉) and total static first hyperpolarizability (βt) at LEVEL OF THEORY/6-31 G(d) for para-nitroaniline, 4-amino-β-nitrostyrene, 4-amino-4′-nitrobiphenyl and 4-amino-4′-nitrostilbene. Tables S6, S7, S8 and S9 include the calculated values for electric dipole moment (μ), average polarizability (〈α〉) and total static first hyperpolarizability (βt) at cam-B3LYP/BASIS SET for para-nitroaniline, 4-amino-β-nitrostyrene, 4-amino-4′-nitrobiphenyl and 4-amino-4′-nitrostilbene. Tables S10 to S15 include the calculated values for para-disubstituted benzenes, 4-β-disubstituted styrenes, 4-4′-disubstituted biphenyls, 4-4′-disubstituted stilbenes, 4-β-disubstituted α-phenylpolyenes oligomers and disubstituted α,ω-diphenylpolyenes oligomers, respectively, at cam-B3LYP/NLO-V, cam-B3LYP/6-31 G(2d) and cam-B3LYP/Def2-SVP levels. Table S16 include the NLO-V basis set for H, B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S and Cl atoms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paschoal, D., Dos Santos, H.F. Assessing the quantum mechanical level of theory for prediction of linear and nonlinear optical properties of push-pull organic molecules. J Mol Model 19, 2079–2090 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1644-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1644-4