Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of assessment instrument on ADHD diagnosis

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared four instruments commonly used to screen for and diagnose Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children. The Bergen Child Study included a DSM-IV ADHD symptom list and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as screen in Phase one. Phase two included the parent Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA), whereas Phase three comprised in-depth clinical assessment, including the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (K-SADS). We compared ADHD as diagnosed by the four instruments in the children with normal intellectual functioning participating in all three phases (N = 234). The DSM-IV ADHD symptom list showed moderate agreement with all other instruments (κ = 0.53–0.57), whereas there was fair agreement between the K-SADS-DAWBA (κ = 0.31) and between SDQ–DAWBA (κ = 0.33). The DAWBA diagnosed fewer children with ADHD than did the other instruments. Implications for use of the instruments are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Screen positive” was defined as scoring above the 90th percentile on either parent or teacher SDQ, or above the 98th percentile on other measures in the questionnaire, or moderate impact by any informant on the SDQ.

References

  1. Moller HJ (2005) Problems associated with the classification and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry 6(1):45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101(2):213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Reyes Los A, Kazdin AE (2005) Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychol Bull 131(4):483–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh M, Weisz JR (2001) Why are we here at the clinic? Parent-child (dis)agreement on referral problems at outpatient treatment entry. J Consult Clin Psychol 69(6):1018–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mash EJ, Hunsley J (2005) Evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders: issues and challenges. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 34(3):362–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faraone SV et al (2003) The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry 2(2):104–113

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J et al (2011) Health behaviors and obesity among US children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by gender and medication use. Prev Med 52(3–4):218–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelham WE Jr, Fabiano GA, Massetti GM (2005) Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 34(3):449–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(5):581–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodman R et al (2000) Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry: J Mental Sci 177:534–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker A et al (2004) Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II11–II16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman R, Scott S (1999) Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 27(1):17–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klasen H et al (2000) Comparing the German versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the child behavior checklist. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9(4):271–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ullebo AK et al (2011) Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20(9):451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swanson JM et al (2001) Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40(2):168–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ford T, Goodman R, Meltzer H (2003) The British child and adolescent mental health survey 1999: the prevalence of DSM-IV disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42(10):1203–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman R et al (2000) The development and well-being assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41(5):645–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aebi M et al. (2012) The use of the development and well-being assessment in clinical practice: a randomized trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 21(10):559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ford T et al (2013) Can standardized diagnostic assessment be a useful adjunct to clinical assessment in child mental health services? A randomized controlled trial of disclosure of the development and well-being assessment to practitioners. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48(4):583–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Angold A et al (2012) Psychiatric diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents: a comparative study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(5):506–517

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufman J et al (1997) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(7):980–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ambrosini PJ (2000) Historical development and present status of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39(1):49–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim YS et al (2004) The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version-Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K). Yonsei Med J 45(1):81–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Posserud MB, Lundervold AJ, Gillberg C (2006) Autistic features in a total population of 7–9-year-old children assessed by the ASSQ (Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(2):167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heiervang E et al (2007) Psychiatric disorders in Norwegian 8- to 10-year-olds: an epidemiological survey of prevalence, risk factors, and service use. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46(4):438–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ullebo AK et al (2012) Prevalence of the ADHD phenotype in 7- to 9-year-old children: effects of informant, gender and non-participation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47(5):763–769

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Posserud M-B, Lundervold AJ, Gillberg C (2009) Validation of the autism spectrum screening questionnaire in a total population sample. J Autism Dev Disord 39(1):126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kopp S, Kelly KB, Gillberg C (2010) Girls with social and/or attention deficits: a descriptive study of 100 clinic attenders. J Atten Disord 14(2):167–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Halmoy A et al (2009) Occupational outcome in adult ADHD: impact of symptom profile, comorbid psychiatric problems, and treatment: a cross-sectional study of 414 clinically diagnosed adult ADHD patients. J Atten Disord 13(2):175–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Graetz BW et al (2006) Gender comparisons of service use among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Emot Behav Disord 14(1):2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heiervang E, Goodman A, Goodman R (2008) The Nordic advantage in child mental health: separating health differences from reporting style in a cross-cultural comparison of psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(6):678–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gillberg C (2010) The ESSENCE in child psychiatry: early symptomatic syndromes eliciting neurodevelopmental clinical examinations. Res Dev Disabil 31(6):1543–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Foreman D, Morton S, Ford T (2009) Exploring the clinical utility of the development and well-being assessment (DAWBA) in the detection of hyperkinetic disorders and associated diagnoses in clinical practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(4):460–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Bergen Child Study research group that has worked together for many years, and whose joint effort has made the study possible. We are grateful to the support of the Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Health, for hosting the study for all these years. Thanks to Anna Spyrou for proof-reading the final manuscript. We also thank the Bergen City Council for collaborating to the study and allowing us to perform the study through the schools. But above all, we thank all the teachers, parents and children in Bergen, for participating in study. The present study was funded by the Western Regional Health Authorities, and the Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Health, Uni Research.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maj-Britt Posserud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Posserud, MB., Ullebø, A.K., Plessen, K.J. et al. Influence of assessment instrument on ADHD diagnosis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23, 197–205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0442-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0442-6

Keywords

Navigation