Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and microbiological effects of a single application of sodium hypochlorite gel during subgingival re-instrumentation: a triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and microbiological effects of a single subgingival administration of sodium hypochlorite gel (NaOCl) and compare it with 1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel and a placebo gel following mechanical re-instrumentation during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT).

Materials and methods

Sixty-two patients who had been treated for stage III–IV periodontitis and enrolled in SPT were included in the study based on following criteria: (1) active periodontal therapy completed at least 6 months before enrollment in the study, (2) presence of at least 4 non-adjacent sites with probing pocket depths (PPDs) ≥ 4 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP), or presence of 5–8 mm PPDs with or without BOP. All sites presenting PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up timepoints were subgingivally re-instrumented with ultrasounds. Selected patients were randomly assigned into three groups and treated additionally with a single subgingival administration of NaOCl gel (group A); 1% CHX gel (group B); and placebo gel (group C). Main outcome variable was pocket closure at 12 months. Secondary outcome variables were changes in mean PPD, BOP, and clinical attachment level (CAL) along with changes in the numbers of the following five keystone bacterial pathogens: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.a.), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.g.), Prevotella intermedia (P.i.), Tannerella forsythia (T.f.), and Treponema denticola (T.d.).

Results

At 12 months, pocket closure was obtained in 77.5% in the NaOCl treated sites. The reduction in PPD was higher with CHX than with NaOCl, although a statistically significant adjunctive effect for NaOCl (P = 0.028) was only observed in comparison with placebo only. Mean CAL improved in all groups and at all timepoints, compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). However, after 6 months, CAL gain was statistically significantly higher in the NaOCl treated group than following application of CHX (P = 0.0026).

Conclusion

In SPT patients, a single adjunctive use of a NaOCl gel may provide benefits in controlling inflammation and residual pockets.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry of Clinical Trials (ISRCTN11387188).

Clinical relevance

A baseline single application of NaOCl gel in conjunction with mechanical debridement may achieve substantial pocket closure in patients enrolled in SPT; treatment time, cost, and applicability considerations should be taken into account when selecting this therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joseph S, Curtis MA (2021) Microbial transitions from health to disease. Periodontol 2000 86(1):201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jakubovics NS, Goodman SD, Mashburn-Warren L, Stafford GP, Cieplik F (2021) The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontol 2000 86(1):32–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sedghi L, DiMassa V, Harrington A, Lynch SV, Kapila YL (2021) The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontol 2000 87(1):107–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12393

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Darveau RP, Curtis MA (2021) Oral biofilms revisited: a novel host tissue of bacteriological origin. Periodontol 2000 86(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ (2021) Polymicrobial communities in periodontal disease: Their quasi-organismal nature and dialogue with the host. Periodontol 2000 86(1):210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonetti MS, Lang NP, Cortellini P et al (2012) Effects of a single topical doxycycline administration adjunctive to mechanical debridement in patients with persistent/recurrent periodontitis but acceptable oral hygiene during supportive periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 39(5):475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tonetti MS, Muller-Campanile V, Lang NP (1998) Changes in the prevalence of residual pockets and tooth loss in treated periodontal patients during a supportive maintenance care program. J Clin Periodontol 25(12):1008–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE et al (2008) Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 35(8):685–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindhe J, Westfelt E, Nyman S, Socransky SS, Haffajee AD (1984) Long-term effect of surgical/non-surgical treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 11(7):448–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manresa C Sanz-Miralles EC Twigg J Bravo M (2018) Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) for maintaining the dentition in adults treated for periodontitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1(1):CD009376

  11. Armitage GC, Xenoudi P (2016) Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontol 2000 71(1):164–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fardal Ø, Johannessen AC, Linden GJ (2004) Tooth loss during maintenance following periodontal treatment in a periodontal practice in Norway. J Clin Periodontol 31(7):550–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farooqi OA, Wehler CJ, Gibson G, Jurasic MM, Jones JA (2015) Appropriate recall interval for periodontal maintenance: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract 15(4):171–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. De Wet LM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA (2018) Supportive periodontal treatment: Pocket depth changes and tooth loss. Int J Dent Hyg 16(2):210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Graetz C, Plaumann A, Schlattmann P et al (2017) Long-term tooth retention in chronic periodontitis—results after 18 years of a conservative periodontal treatment regimen in a university setting. J Clin Periodontol 44(2):169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nibali L, Sun C, Akcalı A, Meng X, Tu YK, Donos N (2017) A retrospective study on periodontal disease progression in private practice. J Clin Periodontol 44(3):290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomasi C, Wennström JL (2017) Is the use of differences in the magnitude of CAL gain appropriate for making conclusions on the efficacy of non-surgical therapeutic means? J Clin Periodontol 44(6):601–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loos BG, Needleman I (2020) Endpoints of active periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 47:61–71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE et al (2018) Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol 89(Suppl 1):S74–S84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M et al (2020) Treatment of stage I-III periodontitis-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol 47(Suppl 22):4–60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bastendorf KD, Strafela-Bastendorf N, Lussi A (2021) Mechanical removal of the biofilm: is the curette still the gold standard? Monogr Oral Sci 29:105–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanz I, Alonso B, Carasol M, Herrera D, Sanz M (2012) Nonsurgical treatment of periodontitis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12(3 Suppl):76–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersilka GJ (2011) Subgingival air-polishing in the treatment of periodontal biofilm infections. Periodontol 2000 55(1):124–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng E, Byun R, Spahr A, Divnic-Resnik T (2018) The efficacy of air polishing devices in supportive periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int 49(6):453–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenkins WM, Said SH, Radvar M, Kinane DF (2000) Effect of subgingival scaling during supportive therapy. J Clin Periodontol 27(8):590–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harks I, Koch R, Eickholz P et al (2015) Is progression of periodontitis relevantly influenced by systemic antibiotics? A clinical randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol 42(9):832–842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodson JM (2000) Antimicrobial strategies for treatment of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 1994(5):142–168

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanes PJ, Purvis JP (2003) Local anti-infective therapy: pharmacological agents. A Syst Rev Ann Periodontol 8(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Perinetti G, Paolantonio M, Cordella C, D’Ercole S, Serra E, Piccolomini R (2004) Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival administration of two active gels on persistent pockets of chronic periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontol 31(4):273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasaj A, Chiriachide A, Willershausen B (2007) The adjunctive use of a controlled-release chlorhexidine chip following treatment with a new ultrasonic device in supportive periodontal therapy: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Int J Dent Hyg 5(4):225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dannewitz B, Lippert K, Lang NP, Tonetti MS, Eickholz P (2009) Supportive periodontal therapy of furcation sites: non-surgical instrumentation with or without topical doxycycline. J Clin Periodontol 36(6):514–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McColl E, Patel K, Dahlen G et al (2006) Supportive periodontal therapy using mechanical instrumentation or 2% minocycline gel: a 12month randomized, controlled, single masked pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 33(2):141–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvi GE, Mombelli A, Mayfield L et al (2002) Local antimicrobial therapy after initial periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 29(6):540–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Eickholz P, Kim TS, Bürklin T et al (2002) Non-surgical periodontal therapy with adjunctive topical doxycycline: a double-blind randomized controlled multicenter study. J Clin Periodontol 29(2):108–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jentsch HFR, Roccuzzo M, Pilloni A, Kasaj A, Fimmers R, Jepsen S (2021) Flapless application of enamel matrix derivative in periodontal retreatment: a multicentre randomized feasibility trial. J Clin Periodontol 48(5):659–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jurczyk K, Nietzsche S, Ender C, Sculean A, Eick S (2016) In-vitro activity of sodium-hypochlorite gel on bacteria associated with periodontitis. Clin Oral Investig 20(8):2165–2173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Slots J (2002) Selection of antimicrobial agents in periodontal therapy. J Periodontal Res 37(5):389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kalkwarf KL, Tussing GJ, Davis MJ (1982) Histologic evaluation of gingival curettage facilitated by sodium hypochlorite solution. J Periodontol 53(2):63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilbert P, Moore LE (2005) Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet. J Appl Microbiol 99(4):703–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Conrads G, Klomp T, Deng D, Wenzler JS, Braun A, Abdelbary MMH (2021) The Antimicrobial susceptibility of porphyromonas gingivalis: genetic repertoire, global phenotype, and review of the literature. Antibiot (Basel) 10(12):1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. RaheemLateef Al-Awsi G, Al-Hadeithi ZSM, AbdalkareemJasim S, Alkhudhairy MK, Ghasemian A (2022) Virulence traits and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance among Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans from Iraq: Low rate of highly virulent JP2 genotype. Microb Pathog 164:105438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. del Carpio-Perochena A, Bramante CM, de Andrade FB et al (2015) Antibacterial and dissolution ability of sodium hypochlorite in different pHs on multi-species biofilms. Clin Oral Investig 19(8):2067–2073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Iorio-Siciliano V, Ramaglia L, Isola G, Blasi A, Salvi GE, Sculean A (2021) Changes in clinical parameters following adjunctive local sodium hypochlorite gel in minimally invasive nonsurgical therapy (MINST) of periodontal pockets: a 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 25(9):5331–5340

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Megally A, Zekeridou A, Cancela J, Giannopoulou C, Mombelli A (2020) Short ultrasonic debridement with adjunctive low-concentrated hypochlorite/amino acid gel during periodontal maintenance: randomized clinical trial of 12 months. Clin Oral Investig 24(1):201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Stratul SI et al (2020) Anti-infective therapy of peri-implant mucositis with adjunctive delivery of a sodium hypochlorite gel: a 6-month randomized triple-blind controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 24(6):1971–1979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roos-Jansåker AM, Almhöjd US, Jansson H (2017) Treatment of peri-implantitis: clinical outcome of chloramine as an adjunctive to non-surgical therapy, a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(1):43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gottardi W, Nagl M (2010) N-chlorotaurine, a natural antiseptic with outstanding tolerability. J Antimicrob Chemother 65(3):399–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gottardi W, Debabov D, Nagl M (2013) N-chloramines, a promising class of well-tolerated topical anti-infectives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(3):1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rodrigues IF, Machion L, Casati MZ et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of the use of locally delivered chlorhexidine in periodontal maintenance therapy. J Periodontol 78(4):624–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tonetti MS, Pini-Prato G, Cortellini P (1995) Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following GTR in infrabony defects A preliminary retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 22(3):229–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T et al (2018) A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions—introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol 45(Suppl 20):S1–S8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE (1972) The plaque control record. J Periodontol 43(1):38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Miller SC (1950) Textbook of Periodontia. Blakiston Co, Philadelphia, p 91

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rusu D, Stratul SI, Sarbu C et al (2017) Evaluation of a hydrophobic gel adhering to the gingiva in comparison with a standard water-soluble 1% chlorhexidine gel after scaling and root planing in patients with moderate chronic periodontitis A randomized clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg 15(1):53–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. R Core Team: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna p201 2017

  56. Tomasi C, Koutouzis T, Wennström JL (2008) Locally delivered doxycycline as an adjunct to mechanical debridement at retreatment of periodontal pockets. J Periodontol 79(3):431–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Dibart S, Smith C, Kent RL Jr, Socransky SS (1997) The effect of SRP on the clinical and microbiological parameters of periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 24(5):324–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sanz-Sánchez I, Montero E, Citterio F, Romano F, Molina A, Aimetti M (2020) Efficacy of access flap procedures compared to subgingival debridement in the treatment of periodontitis A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 47(Suppl 22):282–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lang NP, Tonetti MS (2003) Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent 1(1):7–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schätzle M, Löe H, Lang NP, Bürgin W, Anerud A, Boysen H (2004) The clinical course of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 31(12):1122–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lang NP, Adler R, Joss A, Nyman S (1990) Absence of bleeding on probing An indicator of periodontal stability. J Clin Periodontol 17(10):714–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kolakovic M, Held U, Schmidlin PR, Sahrmann P (2014) An estimate of pocket closure and avoided needs of surgery after scaling and root planing with systemic antibiotics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 14:159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Schmidlin PR, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Mueller HD, Sculean A, Lussi A, Miron RJ (2017) Effects of air polishing and an amino acid buffered hypochlorite solution to dentin surfaces and periodontal ligament cell survival, attachment, and spreading. Clin Oral Investig 21(5):1589–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fujise O, Miura M, Hamachi T, Maeda K (2006) Risk of Porphyromonas gingivalis recolonization during the early period of periodontal maintenance in initially severe periodontitis sites. J Periodontol 77(8):1333–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Viorelia Radulescu, Stefan-Ioan Stratul; methodology: Darian Rusu, Giorgios Kardaras; formal analysis and investigation: Viorelia Radulescu; writing—original draft preparation: Marius Ion Boariu, Vincenzo Iorio Siciliano, Octavia Vela; writing—review and editing: Alexandra Roman, Petra Surlin, Andreea Cristiana Didilescu; supervision: Stefan-Ioan Stratul, Anton Sculean, Holger Jentsch, Luca Ramaglia.Viorelia Radulescu and Darian Rusu have equally contributed and can be both considered as first authors. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Ion Boariu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara (approval no.1/21.01.2018).

Informed consent

All study participants provided written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radulescu, V., Boariu, M.I., Rusu, D. et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of a single application of sodium hypochlorite gel during subgingival re-instrumentation: a triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 26, 6639–6652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04618-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04618-3

Keywords

Navigation