Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tissue response following papilla-sparing and sulcular incisions in oral surgery—an experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study is to compare tissue reduction following papilla-sparing and sulcular incisions in oral surgical indications.

Material and methods

Five beagle dogs were used. Three months after tooth extraction of P2–M1, notches were prepared at the height of the interproximal gingiva into M2 and P1. Papilla-sparing and sulcular incisions were randomly performed, full-thickness flaps elevated and flaps repositioned. Three months postoperatively, tissue reduction was assessed using a digital calliper, mean values were calculated per group and analysed using a Wilcoxon matched-pair rank test.

Results

Papilla-sparing incisions revealed significantly less (p < 0.05) tissue reduction than sulcular incision techniques.

Conclusion

Papilla-sparing incisions seem to induce less tissue response following flap surgery compared to sulcular incisions in oral surgical indications. Nevertheless, tissue reduction was seen in both groups.

Clinical relevance

For surgical approaches without the necessity of direct access to the root surface (i.e., implantology, oral surgery), papilla-sparing incisions may be superior compared to sulcular incisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenberg DL (1972) Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 43:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tavtigian R (1970) The height of the facial radicular alveolar crest following apically positioned flap operations. J Periodontol 41(7):412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Staffileno H (1974) Significant differences and advantages between the full thickness and split thickness flaps. J Periodontol 45(6):421–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeifer J (1965) The reaction of alveolar bone to flap procedures in man. Periodontics 3:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donnenfeld OW, Marks R, Glickman I (1964) The apically repositioned flap—a clinical study. J Periodontol 35:381

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bragger U, Pasqualli L, Kornman KS (1988) Remodelling of interdental alveolar bone after periodontal flap procedure assessed by means of computer-assisted densitometer image analysis (CADIA). J Clin Periodontol 15(558–564)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M (2008) Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: a volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 35(4):356–363. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fickl S, Kebschull M, Schupbach P, Zuhr O, Schlagenhauf U, Hurzeler MB (2011) Bone loss after full-thickness and partial-thickness flap elevation. J Clin Periodontol 38(2):157–162. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01658.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Binderman I, Adut M, Zohar R, Bahar H, Faibish D, Yaffe A (2001) Alveolar bone resorption following coronal versus apical approach in a mucoperiosteal flap surgery procedure in the rat mandible. J Periodontol 72(10):1348–1353. doi:10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez-Roman G (2001) Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16(1):61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yaffe A, Fine N, Binderman I (1994) Regional accelerated phenomenon in the mandible following mucoperiosteal flap surgery. J Periodontol 65(1):79–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner JP (2003) Comparison of papilla healing following sulcular full-thickness flap and papilla base flap in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 36(10):653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner JP (2004) Comparison of long-term papilla healing following sulcular full thickness flap and papilla base flap in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 37(10):687–693. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00852.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deschner J, Wolff S, Hedderich J, Kreusch T, Jepsen S (2009) Dimensional changes of periodontal soft tissues after intrasulcular incision. Clin Oral Investig 13(4):401–408. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0251-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Costich ER, Ramfjord SP (1968) Healing after partial denudation of the alveolar process. J Periodontol 39(3):127–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeifer JS (1965) The reaction of alveolar bone to flap procedures in man. Periodontics 20:135–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carnevale G, Sterrantino SF, Di Febo G (1983) Soft and hard tissue wound healing following tooth preparation to the alveolar crest. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 3(6):36–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine HL, Stahl SS (1972) Repair following periodontal flap surgery with the retention of gingival fibers. J Periodontol 43(2):99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by a research grant funded by the German Society of Periodontology (DGParo) and Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Fickl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fickl, S., Fischer, K.R., Negri, B. et al. Tissue response following papilla-sparing and sulcular incisions in oral surgery—an experimental study. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1313–1317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1069-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1069-1

Keywords

Navigation