Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dimensional changes of periodontal soft tissues after intrasulcular incision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In maxillofacial surgery, intrasulcular incisions are often used. This prospective case series was established to evaluate the detrimental effects of intrasulcular incisions on periodontal structures. In 35 patients, measurements of probing depth and crown length before and 10 months postoperatively were performed to calculate changes of attachment level and gingival recession. In a subgroup, surgically treated sites were compared with untreated control sites. A nonparametric test was applied for longitudinal and split-mouth comparisons. Overall, intrasulcular incisions did not induce significant attachment loss. The frequency of sites losing ≥2 mm of attachment was 5.0%, 2.6%, and 4.7% at mesial, buccal, and distal sites, respectively. Intrasulcular incisions caused only a slight increase in gingival recession by 0.4 ± 0.5, 0.2 ± 0.3, and 0.3 ± 0.4 mm at mesial, buccal, and distal sites, respectively. Within the limitations of the study design, it can be concluded that intrasulcular incisions without additional vertical incisions do not impose a serious risk for attachment loss and/or gingival recession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chindia M, Valderhaug J (1995) Periodontal status following trapezoidal and semilunar flaps in apicectomy. East Afr Med J 72(9):564–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowling E, Maze G, Kaldahl W (1994) Postsurgical timing of restorative therapy: a review. J Prosthodont 3(3):172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramper B, Kaminski E, Osetek E, Heuer M (1984) A comparative study of the wound healing of three types of flap design used in periapical surgery. J Endod 10(1):17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang N, Tonetti M (2003) Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent 1(1):7–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luebke R (1974) Surgical endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 18(2):379–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Machtei E, Dunford R, Hausmann E, Grossi S, Powell J, Cummins D et al (1997) Longitudinal study of prognostic factors in established periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontol 24(2):102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nieri M, Muzzi L, Cattabriga M, Rotundo R, Cairo F, Pini Prato G (2002) The prognostic value of several periodontal factors measured as radiographic bone level variation: a 10-year retrospective multilevel analysis of treated and maintained periodontal patients. J Periodontol 73(12):1485–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oates T, West J, Jones J, Kaiser D, Cochran D (2002) Long-term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implants. Implant Dent 11(3):272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Persson G, Attstrom R, Lang N, Page R (2003) Perceived risk of deteriorating periodontal conditions. J Clin Periodontol 30(11):982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M (2002) Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):178–194 (discussion 195–196)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Small P, Tarnow D (2000) Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(4):527–532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suarez-Cunqueiro M, Gutwald R, Reichman J, Otero-Cepeda X, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(4):403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velvart P, Peters C (2005) Soft tissue management in endodontic surgery. J Endod 31(1):4–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner J (2003) Comparison of papilla healing following sulcular full-thickness flap and papilla base flap in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 36(10):653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner J (2004) Comparison of long-term papilla healing following sulcular full thickness flap and papilla base flap in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 37(10):687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner J (2004) Papilla healing following sulcular full thickness flap in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98(3):365–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Velvart P (2002) Papilla base incision: a new approach to recession-free healing of the interdental papilla after endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 35(5):453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wennstrom J (1983) Regeneration of gingiva following surgical excision. A clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 10(3):287–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Deschner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deschner, J., Wolff, S., Hedderich, J. et al. Dimensional changes of periodontal soft tissues after intrasulcular incision. Clin Oral Invest 13, 401–408 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0251-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0251-y

Keywords

Navigation