Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of radiological femoroacetabular impingement in Japanese hip joints: detailed investigation with computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been highlighted as a new etiology for osteoarthritis of the hip, and its prevalence has been reported in the past decade. In the present study, we performed a detailed investigation of the anatomical parameters related to FAI and calculated the prevalence of FAI-related findings in asymptomatic Japanese hip joints using computed tomography.

Methods

We evaluated high-resolution reconstructed multislice computed tomography images in patients who had undergone computed tomography imaging in our institution for conditions unrelated to hip disorders. The examined parameters were as follows: center-edge (CE) angle; acetabular index; acetabular anteversion (five slices in the axial plane); and asphericity angle of the femoral head (AAFH) (six slices in multiple radial planes). The AAFH in the oblique axial slice through the center of the femoral neck is the so-called α-angle. We then examined the accurate prevalence of FAI-related findings in Japan.

Results

We investigated a total of 103 hips. The mean age of the subjects was 59.4 years. The mean CE angle was 31.1° and the mean acetabular index was 7.0°. The mean acetabular anteversion was 20.3° at the level of the hip center, and decreased as the slice level neared the superior margin of the femoral head. The mean AAFH ranged from 40.6° to 49.2° in the radial planes. The AAFH was largest at 60° rotated slice from the oblique axial slice through the center of the femoral neck. The prevalence of FAI-related findings in these Japanese hip joints was assessed as follows. An AAFH of >50° in any slice was detected in 51.5 % of the hips, and acetabular anteversion was negative for all images in 16.5 % of the hips, meaning that a total of 56.3 % of the images met the criteria for radiological FAI.

Conclusions

With consideration of our results, we emphasize that “anatomical or radiological FAI” is not uncommon in Japanese hips. Therefore, the diagnosis of FAI should be performed with the clinical findings taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:93–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganz R, Parvisi J, Beck M, Leuning M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis: what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1540–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung KA, Restrepo C, Hellman M, AbdelSalam H, Morrison W, Parvizi J. The prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in asymptomatic adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1303–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wegener DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ochoa LM, Dawson L, Patzkowski JC, Hsu JR. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in young population with hip complaints is high. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2710–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IØ, Estwood DM, Engesaeter LB, Rosendahl K. Prevalance of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology. 2011;260(2):494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori R, Yasunaga Y, Yamamoto T, Nakashiro J, Fujii J, Terayama H, Ohshima S, Ochi M. Are cam and pincer deformities as common as dysplasia on Japanese patients with hip pain? Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(2):172–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukushima K, Uchiyama K, Takahira N, Moriyama M, Yamamoto T, Itoman M, Takaso M. Prevalence of radiographic findings of femoroacetabular impingement in the Japanese population. J OrthopSurg Res. 2014;11(9):25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goergen TG, Resnick D. Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centering. Br J Radiol. 1975;48(568):259–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beaule PE, Zaragonza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(6):1286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakraverty JK, Sullivan C, Gan C, Narayanaswamy S, Kamath S. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: CT findings of features resembling femoroacetabular impingement in a young population without symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perreira AC, Hunter JC, Laird T, Jamali AA. Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):552–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang AC, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J. Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(6):1160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lepage-Saucier M, Thiery C, Larbi A, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Omoumi P. Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabulum and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83(Suppl 58):33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tönnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Berlin: Springer; 1987. p. 120.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE. Prevalance of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(14):2436–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ergen FB, Vudali S, Sanverdi E, Dolgun A, Aydingöz Ü. CT assessment of asymptomatic hip joints for the background of femoroacetabular impingement morphology. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):271–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Scumid MR, Treiber K, Holder J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ergen FB, Vudali S, Sanverdi E, Dolgun A, Aydingös Ü. CT assessment of asymptomatic hip joints for the background of femoroacetabular impingement morphology. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):271–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241(241):190–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeyama A, Naito M, Shiramizu Kei, Kiyama T. Prevalance of femoroacetabular impingement in Asian patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Int Orthop. 2009;33(5):1229–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leapge-Saucier M, Thiery C, Larbi A, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Omoumi P. Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1707–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Stake CE, Finchi NA, Dunne KF, Domb BG. Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(9):2149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy SB, Tannast M, Kim YJ, Buly R, Millis MB. Debridement of adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jäger M, Wild A, Westhoff B, Krauspe R. Femoroacetabular impingement caused by a femoral osseous head-neck bump deformity: clinical, radiological, and experimental results. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(3):256–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Arden NK, Carr AJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Thomas GE, Weinans H, Glyn-Jones S. Cam impingement of the hip: a risk for hip osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(10):630–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Roze RH, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Waarsing JH. Pincer deformity does not lead to osteoarthritis of the hip whereas acetabular dysplasia does: acetabular coverage and development of osteoarthritis in a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(10):1514–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hartofilakidis G, Bardakos NV, Badis GC, Geirgiades G. An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):580–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):162–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Paliobeis CP, Villar RN. The presence of dysplasia in femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2011;21(2):141–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Mimura.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mimura, T., Kawasaki, T., Itakura, S. et al. Prevalence of radiological femoroacetabular impingement in Japanese hip joints: detailed investigation with computed tomography. J Orthop Sci 20, 649–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0733-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0733-5

Keywords

Navigation