Abstract
Objective
To determine the means and the reference intervals of the quantitative morphometric parameters of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in normal hips with high-resolution computed tomography (CT).
Methods
We prospectively included 94 adult individuals who underwent CT for thoracic, abdominal or urologic pathologies. Patients with a clinical history of hip pathology and/or with osteoarthritis on CT were excluded. We calculated means and 95 % reference intervals for imaging signs of cam-type (alpha angle at 90° and 45° and femoral head–neck offset) and pincer-type impingement (acetabular version angle, lateral centre-edge angle and acetabular index).
Results
The 95 % reference interval limits were all far beyond the abnormal thresholds found in the literature for cam-type and to a lesser extent for pincer-type FAI. The upper limits of the reference intervals for the alpha angles (at 90°/45°) were 68°/83° (men) and 69°/84° (women), compared to thresholds from the literature (50°, 55° or 60°). Reference intervals were similar between genders for cam-type parameters, and slightly differed for pincer-type.
Conclusion
The 95 % reference intervals of morphometric measurements of FAI in asymptomatic hips were beyond the abnormal thresholds, which was especially true for cam-type FAI. Our results suggest the need for redefining the current morphometric parameters used in the diagnosis of FAI.
Key Points
• 95 % reference intervals limits of FAI morphotype were beyond currently defined thresholds.
• Reference intervals of pincer-type morphotype measurements were close to current definitions.
• Reference intervals of cam-type morphotype measurements were far beyond the current definitions.
• Current morphometric definitions of cam-type morphotype should be used with care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CT:
-
computed tomography
- FAI:
-
femoroacetabular impingement
- ICC:
-
intraclass correlation coefficients
- MPR:
-
multiplanar reformatting
- MRI:
-
magnetic resonance imaging
- OA:
-
osteoarthritis
- PACS:
-
picture archiving and storage system
References
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120
Ito K, Leunig M, Ganz R (2004) Histopathologic features of the acetabular labrum in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:262–271
Wagner S, Hofstetter W, Chiquet M, Mainil-Varlet P, Stauffer E, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2003) Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. Osteoarthr Cartil 11:508–518
Byrd JWT (2014) Femoroacetabular impingement in athletes: current concepts. Am J Sports Med 42:737–751
Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis–what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–1552
Kassarjian A, Brisson M, Palmer WE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol 63:29–35
Matsuda DK, Carlisle JC, Arthurs SC, Wierks CH, Philippon MJ (2011) Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 27:252–269
Ng VY, Arora N, Best TM, Pan X, Ellis TJ (2010) Efficacy of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 38:2337–2345
Parvizi J, Leunig M, Ganz R (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:561–570
Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 23:1286–1292
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE et al (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47–66
James SLJ, Ali K, Malara F, Young D, O'Donnell J, Connell DA (2006) MRI findings of femoroacetabular impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1412–1419
Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:556–560
Pfirrmann CWA, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785
Ecker TM, Tannast M, Puls M, Siebenrock KA, Murphy SB (2007) Pathomorphologic alterations predict presence or absence of hip osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:46–52
Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A (2010) Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1162–1169
Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE (2010) Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2436–2444
Kang ACL, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J (2010) Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 38:1160–1165
Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CWA (2012) How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? Radiology 264:514–521
Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1747–1770
Pollard TCB, Villar RN, Norton MR et al (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop 81:134–141
Chakraverty JK, Sullivan C, Gan C, Narayanaswamy S, Kamath S (2013) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: CT findings of features resembling femoroacetabular impingement in a young population without symptoms. Am J Roentgenol 200:389–395
Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesæter I, Eastwood DM, Engesæter LB, Rosendahl K (2011) Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology 260:494–502
Reichenbach S, Jüni P, Werlen S et al (2010) Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study. Arthr Care Res (Hoboken) 62:1319–1327
Kapron AL, Anderson AE, Aoki SK, Phillips LG, Petron DJ, Toth R, Peters CL (2011) Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:e111(1-e1110)
Omoumi P, Thiery C, Michoux N, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC (2014) Anatomic features associated with femoroacetabular impingement are equally common in hips of old and young asymptomatic individuals without CT signs of osteoarthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10083
Horowitz GL, Altaie S, Boyd JC et al (2008) Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline–third edition CLSI document C28-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
Collins JA, Ward JP, Youm T (2013) Is prophylactic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement indicated? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546513499227
de Bruin F, Reijnierse M, Farhang-Razi V, Bloem JL (2013) Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population. Eur Radiol 23:3131–3139
Altman DG (1990) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaulé PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:660–665
Harris-Hayes M, Royer NK (2011) Relationship of acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement to hip osteoarthritis: a focused review. PM R 3:1055–1067.e1
Werner CM, Ramseier LE, Ruckstuhl T et al (2012) Normal values of Wiberg’s lateral center-edge angle and Lequesne’s acetabular index-a coxometric update. Skelet Radiol 41:1273–1278
Palmer WE (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement: caution is warranted in making imaging-based assumptions and diagnoses. Radiology 257:4–7
Acknowledgements
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Patrick Omoumi. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. We received approval from the institutional ethical committee of our institution: Commission d'Éthique Biomédicale Hospitalo-Facultaire, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc - Université Catholique de Louvain. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, observational, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lepage-Saucier, M., Thiéry, C., Larbi, A. et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips. Eur Radiol 24, 1707–1714 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3171-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3171-4