Abstract
Background
The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is a disease-specific shoulder questionnaire to measure quality of life in patients with shoulder instability. The aim of the present study was to translate the WOSI into Dutch and assess its principal measurement properties.
Methods
The WOSI was translated into Dutch according to guidelines in the literature. Fifty-two shoulder instability patients completed the questionnaire twice within 2 weeks. We assessed internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), test–retest reliability [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)], standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and reliable change index. The Bland–Altman analysis was applied to assess test–retest agreement and floor and ceiling effects were calculated.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 for the total WOSI score (range 0.88–0.95 for the 4 domains). ICC for the total WOSI score was 0.91 (range 0.79–0.90 for domains), SEM was 130.6 for the total WOSI score resulting in a SDC of 362.0, which is 17.3 % of the maximum obtainable score of 2100. Bland–Altman analysis showed no systematic differences or consistent bias between the two assessments. We observed no relevant floor and ceiling effects.
Conclusion
The results of the present study suggest the Dutch version of the WOSI is a reliable tool for clinical assessment and scientific evaluation. It shows high values for Cronbach’s alpha and ICC implying excellent internal consistency and good test–retest reliability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van der Heijden GJ. Shoulder disorders: a state-of-the-art review. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 1999;13:287–309.
Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:764–72.
Kuhn JE. A new classification system for shoulder instability. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:341–6.
Hayes K, Callanan M, Walton J, Paxinos A, Murrell GA. Shoulder instability: management and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32:497–509.
Simmen BR, Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Herren DB, Pap G, Aeschlimann A, Goldhahn J. A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:113–8.
Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S217–32.
Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–41.
Wright RW, Baumgarten KM. Shoulder outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:436–44.
Rouleau DM, Faber K, MacDermid JC. Systematic review of patient-administered shoulder functional scores on instability. J Should Elb Surg. 2010;19:1121–8.
Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Hofstaetter SG, Wurnig C, Huber W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:787–96.
Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Griffin SH, Rosa F, Properzi G, Padua L, Padua R, Carnelli F, Calvisi V, Santilli V. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of an Italian version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:559–67.
Hatta T, Shinozaki N, Omi R, Sano H, Yamamoto N, Ando A, Sugaya H, Aizawa T, Kuriyami S, Itoy E. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) in the Japanese population. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:732–6.
Salomonsson B, Ahlstrom S, Dalen N, Lillkrona U. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a Swedish translation. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:233–8.
Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S, Flury MP, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers. Orthopade. 2010;39:711–8.
van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, Terwee CB, Dijksman LM, Kleinjan G, Willems WJ. Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2396–403.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter L, de Vet H. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49.
Acquadro C, Jambon B, Ellis D, Marquis P. Language and translation issues. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven; 1996.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter L, de Vet H. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter L, de Vet H. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.
Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:187–99.
Weir JP. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–40.
Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek AL. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:571–8.
de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.
Wiertsema SH, Rietberg MB, Hekman KM, Schothorst M, Steultjens MP, Dekker J. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. J Should Elb Surg. 2013;22:165–70.
de Witte PB, Henseler JF, Nagels J, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG. The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1611–9.
Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Tveita EK, Keller A, Juel NG, Brox JI. Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:68.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Oxford: Medical Publication; 2008.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sharon Griffin for her permission to translate the original WOSI, Arthur de Gast for his participation in the translation process and Caroline Terwee for her assistance in interpreting COSMIN correctly.
Conflict of interest
The authors, their immediate family, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Wiertsema, S.H., de Witte, P.B., Rietberg, M.B. et al. Measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). J Orthop Sci 19, 242–249 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0517-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0517-8